All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] page_alloc.c: inline __rmqueue()
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:51:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171010025151.GD1798@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a46edcf-88f8-e4f4-8b15-3c02620308e4@intel.com>

On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 01:23:34PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 10/08/2017 10:44 PM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > On a 2 sockets Intel-Skylake machine:
> >       base          %change       head
> >      77342            +6.3%      82203        will-it-scale.per_process_ops
> 
> What's the unit here?  That seems ridiculously low for page_fault1.
> It's usually in the millions.

per_process_ops = processes/nr_process

since nr_process here is nr_cpu, so on the 2 sockets machine with 104
CPUs, processes are 8043568(base) and 8549112(head), which are in the
millions as you correctly pointed out.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] page_alloc.c: inline __rmqueue()
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:51:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171010025151.GD1798@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a46edcf-88f8-e4f4-8b15-3c02620308e4@intel.com>

On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 01:23:34PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 10/08/2017 10:44 PM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > On a 2 sockets Intel-Skylake machine:
> >       base          %change       head
> >      77342            +6.3%      82203        will-it-scale.per_process_ops
> 
> What's the unit here?  That seems ridiculously low for page_fault1.
> It's usually in the millions.

per_process_ops = processes/nr_process

since nr_process here is nr_cpu, so on the 2 sockets machine with 104
CPUs, processes are 8043568(base) and 8549112(head), which are in the
millions as you correctly pointed out.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-10  2:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-09  5:44 [PATCH] page_alloc.c: inline __rmqueue() Aaron Lu
2017-10-09  5:44 ` Aaron Lu
2017-10-09  7:37 ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-10-09  7:37   ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-10-09  7:53   ` Aaron Lu
2017-10-09  7:53     ` Aaron Lu
2017-10-09 20:23 ` Dave Hansen
2017-10-09 20:23   ` Dave Hansen
2017-10-10  2:51   ` Aaron Lu [this message]
2017-10-10  2:51     ` Aaron Lu
2017-10-10  2:56     ` [PATCH v2] mm/page_alloc.c: " Aaron Lu
2017-10-10  2:56       ` Aaron Lu
2017-10-10  5:19       ` Dave Hansen
2017-10-10  5:19         ` Dave Hansen
2017-10-10  5:43         ` Aaron Lu
2017-10-10  5:43           ` Aaron Lu
2017-10-10 21:45           ` Andrew Morton
2017-10-10 21:45             ` Andrew Morton
2017-10-10 22:27             ` Andi Kleen
2017-10-10 22:27               ` Andi Kleen
2017-10-11  2:34             ` Aaron Lu
2017-10-11  2:34               ` Aaron Lu
2017-10-13  6:31               ` [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: make sure __rmqueue() etc. always inline Aaron Lu
2017-10-13  6:31                 ` Aaron Lu
2017-10-17 11:32                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-10-17 11:32                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-10-18  1:53                   ` Lu, Aaron
2017-10-18  6:28                     ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-10-18  6:28                       ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-10-18  8:57                       ` Aaron Lu
2017-10-18  8:57                         ` Aaron Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171010025151.GD1798@intel.com \
    --to=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=kemi.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.