From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] mtd: nand: omap2: Remove omap_nand_platform_data
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 11:40:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171010114047.202d7d44@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171006103543.gnb2hxq7msallyzl@lenoch>
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 12:35:43 +0200
Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> As driver is now configured using DT, omap_nand_platform_data structure
> is no longer needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org>
> ---
> Resend to linux-mtd as other part this patch was depending on
> was merged months ago via linux-omap tree...
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 40 +++++++---------------------
> include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h | 17 ------------
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
> index 54540c8fa1a2..b1fc070c8279 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
> @@ -1588,8 +1588,7 @@ static bool is_elm_present(struct omap_nand_info *info,
> return true;
> }
>
> -static bool omap2_nand_ecc_check(struct omap_nand_info *info,
> - struct omap_nand_platform_data *pdata)
> +static bool omap2_nand_ecc_check(struct omap_nand_info *info)
> {
> bool ecc_needs_bch, ecc_needs_omap_bch, ecc_needs_elm;
>
> @@ -1804,7 +1803,6 @@ static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops omap_sw_ooblayout_ops = {
> static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct omap_nand_info *info;
> - struct omap_nand_platform_data *pdata = NULL;
> struct mtd_info *mtd;
> struct nand_chip *nand_chip;
> int err;
> @@ -1814,6 +1812,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int min_oobbytes = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
> int oobbytes_per_step;
>
> + if (!dev->of_node)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
Is this really needed? I expect omap_get_dt_info() to return an error
when dev->of_node is NULL.
> info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct omap_nand_info),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!info)
> @@ -1821,29 +1822,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> info->pdev = pdev;
>
> - if (dev->of_node) {
> - if (omap_get_dt_info(dev, info))
> - return -EINVAL;
> - } else {
> - pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> - if (!pdata) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "platform data missing\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - info->gpmc_cs = pdata->cs;
> - info->reg = pdata->reg;
> - info->ecc_opt = pdata->ecc_opt;
> - if (pdata->dev_ready)
> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "pdata->dev_ready is deprecated\n");
> -
> - info->xfer_type = pdata->xfer_type;
> - info->devsize = pdata->devsize;
> - info->elm_of_node = pdata->elm_of_node;
> - info->flash_bbt = pdata->flash_bbt;
> - }
> + if (omap_get_dt_info(dev, info))
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, info);
This removal seems unrelated to the change you're describing in the
commit log. I'm not saying we should keep this platform_set_drvdata()
if it's useless, but it should be done in a separate patch.
> info->ops = gpmc_omap_get_nand_ops(&info->reg, info->gpmc_cs);
> if (!info->ops) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get GPMC->NAND interface\n");
> @@ -2002,7 +1983,7 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto return_error;
> }
>
> - if (!omap2_nand_ecc_check(info, pdata)) {
> + if (!omap2_nand_ecc_check(info)) {
> err = -EINVAL;
> goto return_error;
> }
> @@ -2167,10 +2148,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (err)
> goto return_error;
>
> - if (dev->of_node)
> - mtd_device_register(mtd, NULL, 0);
> - else
> - mtd_device_register(mtd, pdata->parts, pdata->nr_parts);
> + err = mtd_device_register(mtd, NULL, 0);
> + if (err)
> + goto return_error;
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mtd);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h b/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h
> index 25e267f1970c..619df2431e75 100644
> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h
> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h
> @@ -64,21 +64,4 @@ struct gpmc_nand_regs {
> void __iomem *gpmc_bch_result5[GPMC_BCH_NUM_REMAINDER];
> void __iomem *gpmc_bch_result6[GPMC_BCH_NUM_REMAINDER];
> };
> -
> -struct omap_nand_platform_data {
> - int cs;
> - struct mtd_partition *parts;
> - int nr_parts;
> - bool flash_bbt;
> - enum nand_io xfer_type;
> - int devsize;
> - enum omap_ecc ecc_opt;
> -
> - struct device_node *elm_of_node;
> -
> - /* deprecated */
> - struct gpmc_nand_regs reg;
> - struct device_node *of_node;
> - bool dev_ready;
> -};
> #endif
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] mtd: nand: omap2: Remove omap_nand_platform_data
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 11:40:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171010114047.202d7d44@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171006103543.gnb2hxq7msallyzl@lenoch>
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 12:35:43 +0200
Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> As driver is now configured using DT, omap_nand_platform_data structure
> is no longer needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org>
> ---
> Resend to linux-mtd as other part this patch was depending on
> was merged months ago via linux-omap tree...
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 40 +++++++---------------------
> include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h | 17 ------------
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
> index 54540c8fa1a2..b1fc070c8279 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
> @@ -1588,8 +1588,7 @@ static bool is_elm_present(struct omap_nand_info *info,
> return true;
> }
>
> -static bool omap2_nand_ecc_check(struct omap_nand_info *info,
> - struct omap_nand_platform_data *pdata)
> +static bool omap2_nand_ecc_check(struct omap_nand_info *info)
> {
> bool ecc_needs_bch, ecc_needs_omap_bch, ecc_needs_elm;
>
> @@ -1804,7 +1803,6 @@ static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops omap_sw_ooblayout_ops = {
> static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct omap_nand_info *info;
> - struct omap_nand_platform_data *pdata = NULL;
> struct mtd_info *mtd;
> struct nand_chip *nand_chip;
> int err;
> @@ -1814,6 +1812,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int min_oobbytes = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
> int oobbytes_per_step;
>
> + if (!dev->of_node)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
Is this really needed? I expect omap_get_dt_info() to return an error
when dev->of_node is NULL.
> info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct omap_nand_info),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!info)
> @@ -1821,29 +1822,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> info->pdev = pdev;
>
> - if (dev->of_node) {
> - if (omap_get_dt_info(dev, info))
> - return -EINVAL;
> - } else {
> - pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> - if (!pdata) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "platform data missing\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - info->gpmc_cs = pdata->cs;
> - info->reg = pdata->reg;
> - info->ecc_opt = pdata->ecc_opt;
> - if (pdata->dev_ready)
> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "pdata->dev_ready is deprecated\n");
> -
> - info->xfer_type = pdata->xfer_type;
> - info->devsize = pdata->devsize;
> - info->elm_of_node = pdata->elm_of_node;
> - info->flash_bbt = pdata->flash_bbt;
> - }
> + if (omap_get_dt_info(dev, info))
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, info);
This removal seems unrelated to the change you're describing in the
commit log. I'm not saying we should keep this platform_set_drvdata()
if it's useless, but it should be done in a separate patch.
> info->ops = gpmc_omap_get_nand_ops(&info->reg, info->gpmc_cs);
> if (!info->ops) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get GPMC->NAND interface\n");
> @@ -2002,7 +1983,7 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto return_error;
> }
>
> - if (!omap2_nand_ecc_check(info, pdata)) {
> + if (!omap2_nand_ecc_check(info)) {
> err = -EINVAL;
> goto return_error;
> }
> @@ -2167,10 +2148,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (err)
> goto return_error;
>
> - if (dev->of_node)
> - mtd_device_register(mtd, NULL, 0);
> - else
> - mtd_device_register(mtd, pdata->parts, pdata->nr_parts);
> + err = mtd_device_register(mtd, NULL, 0);
> + if (err)
> + goto return_error;
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mtd);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h b/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h
> index 25e267f1970c..619df2431e75 100644
> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h
> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h
> @@ -64,21 +64,4 @@ struct gpmc_nand_regs {
> void __iomem *gpmc_bch_result5[GPMC_BCH_NUM_REMAINDER];
> void __iomem *gpmc_bch_result6[GPMC_BCH_NUM_REMAINDER];
> };
> -
> -struct omap_nand_platform_data {
> - int cs;
> - struct mtd_partition *parts;
> - int nr_parts;
> - bool flash_bbt;
> - enum nand_io xfer_type;
> - int devsize;
> - enum omap_ecc ecc_opt;
> -
> - struct device_node *elm_of_node;
> -
> - /* deprecated */
> - struct gpmc_nand_regs reg;
> - struct device_node *of_node;
> - bool dev_ready;
> -};
> #endif
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-10 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-06 10:35 [RESEND PATCH] mtd: nand: omap2: Remove omap_nand_platform_data Ladislav Michl
2017-10-06 10:35 ` Ladislav Michl
2017-10-10 9:40 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2017-10-10 9:40 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-10-12 11:28 ` Roger Quadros
2017-10-12 11:28 ` Roger Quadros
2017-10-12 11:38 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-10-12 11:38 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-10-12 14:09 ` Roger Quadros
2017-10-12 14:09 ` Roger Quadros
2017-10-12 14:15 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-10-12 14:15 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171010114047.202d7d44@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=ladis@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.