From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: firmware: psci: Add psci_is_available()
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 10:58:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171012105801.0bb643eb@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507708982-12336-2-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be>
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:03:01 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> PSCI support may be disabled at build time (by configuration) or at
> run-time (PSCI firmware not present). While CONFIG_ARM_PSCI_FW can be
> used to check for build time enablement, there is currently no simple
> way to check if PSCI is actually available and used.
>
> Hence add a helper function to check if PSCI is available.
>
> This is useful for e.g. drivers that are used on platforms with and
> without PSCI. Such drivers may need to take provisions for proper
> operation when PSCI is used, and/or to implement functionality that is
> usually provided by PSCI.
the psci_ops is a global var, why not check psci_ops.mmnn members
individually in each drivers? check IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PSCI_FW) for
building time ennoblement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/psci.c | 5 +++++
> include/linux/psci.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> index da469c972b503f83..a3a11e2d8ffffaaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> @@ -670,6 +670,11 @@ int __init psci_dt_init(void)
> return init_fn(np);
> }
>
> +bool psci_is_available(void)
> +{
> + return psci_ops.cpu_off && psci_ops.cpu_on && psci_ops.cpu_suspend;
IIRC, for PSCI 0.1, cpu_suspend is optional, we can't say the PSCI isn't
available if cpu_suspend is missing.
Thanks
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com (Jisheng Zhang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: firmware: psci: Add psci_is_available()
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 10:58:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171012105801.0bb643eb@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507708982-12336-2-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be>
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:03:01 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> PSCI support may be disabled at build time (by configuration) or at
> run-time (PSCI firmware not present). While CONFIG_ARM_PSCI_FW can be
> used to check for build time enablement, there is currently no simple
> way to check if PSCI is actually available and used.
>
> Hence add a helper function to check if PSCI is available.
>
> This is useful for e.g. drivers that are used on platforms with and
> without PSCI. Such drivers may need to take provisions for proper
> operation when PSCI is used, and/or to implement functionality that is
> usually provided by PSCI.
the psci_ops is a global var, why not check psci_ops.mmnn members
individually in each drivers? check IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PSCI_FW) for
building time ennoblement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/psci.c | 5 +++++
> include/linux/psci.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> index da469c972b503f83..a3a11e2d8ffffaaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> @@ -670,6 +670,11 @@ int __init psci_dt_init(void)
> return init_fn(np);
> }
>
> +bool psci_is_available(void)
> +{
> + return psci_ops.cpu_off && psci_ops.cpu_on && psci_ops.cpu_suspend;
IIRC, for PSCI 0.1, cpu_suspend is optional, we can't say the PSCI isn't
available if cpu_suspend is missing.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-12 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-11 8:03 [PATCH 0/2] drivers: firmware: psci: Extract psci_is_available() helper Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-10-11 8:03 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-10-11 8:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] drivers: firmware: psci: Add psci_is_available() Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-10-11 8:03 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-10-12 2:58 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2017-10-12 2:58 ` Jisheng Zhang
2017-10-12 6:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-10-12 6:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-10-25 15:45 ` [1/2] " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-10-25 15:45 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-10-11 8:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] drivers: firmware: psci: checker: Use psci_is_available() Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171012105801.0bb643eb@xhacker.debian \
--to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.