Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/7] improve error handling for IO instr

[Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

* Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2017-10-17 18:19:20 +0200]:

[...]

> >> Testing
> >> =======
> >>
> >> Nothing happened since v2 except for a quick smoke test. Dong Jia gave v2
> >> a spin with a focus on vfio-ccw. @Dong Jia I would appreciate some proper
> >> testing, especially regarding the changes in vfio-ccw (patch #3).
> > 
> > Looks sane to me (if needed, I can fix up the minor things I found).
> > 
> > In addition to some testing, I'd appreciate some review from others as
> > well.
> > 
> 
> Of course, I'm fine with the fixes (won't answer individually). I think
> both Dong Jia and Pierre have already put enough work in this to be credited
> with a tag, so I really hope they will get around to review this. I would
> be especially happy with an Tested-by: Dong Jia since this series is quite
> under-tested, and the changes in vfio-ccw aren't just minor.
> 
> Of course I could come up with a test setup myself, but I hope Dong Jia
> already has one, and he is certainly more involved with vfio-ccw.
> 
Using Conny's s390-next branch + this series (#2-#7), I didn't notice
any obvious problem during my fio test.  So for the vfio-ccw related
part:
Tested-by: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

[...]

-- 
Dong Jia Shi