Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/7] improve error handling for IO instr

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:23:47 +0800
Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> * Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2017-10-17 18:19:20 +0200]:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > >> Testing
> > >> =======
> > >>
> > >> Nothing happened since v2 except for a quick smoke test. Dong Jia gave v2
> > >> a spin with a focus on vfio-ccw. @Dong Jia I would appreciate some proper
> > >> testing, especially regarding the changes in vfio-ccw (patch #3).  
> > > 
> > > Looks sane to me (if needed, I can fix up the minor things I found).
> > > 
> > > In addition to some testing, I'd appreciate some review from others as
> > > well.
> > >   
> > 
> > Of course, I'm fine with the fixes (won't answer individually). I think
> > both Dong Jia and Pierre have already put enough work in this to be credited
> > with a tag, so I really hope they will get around to review this. I would
> > be especially happy with an Tested-by: Dong Jia since this series is quite
> > under-tested, and the changes in vfio-ccw aren't just minor.
> > 
> > Of course I could come up with a test setup myself, but I hope Dong Jia
> > already has one, and he is certainly more involved with vfio-ccw.
> >   
> Using Conny's s390-next branch + this series (#2-#7), I didn't notice
> any obvious problem during my fio test.  So for the vfio-ccw related
> part:
> Tested-by: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Thanks!

To which patches may I add the tag? :)