From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterhuewe@gmx.de,
tpmdd@selhorst.net, jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com,
patrickc@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] tpm: reduce tpm polling delay in tpm_tis_core
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 18:24:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171018152447.b6scwbbmulrfzymw@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171017203232.2262-4-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:32:31PM -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> The existing wait_for_tpm_stat() polls for the chip status after
> 5msec sleep. As per TCG ddwg input, it is expected that tpm might
> return status in few usec. So, reducing the delay in polling to
> 1msec.
> Similarly, get_burstcount() function sleeps for 5msec before
> retrying for next query to burstcount in a loop. If it takes
> lesser time for TPM to return, this 5msec delay is longer than
> necessary.
>
> After this change, performance on a TPM 1.2 with an 8 byte
> burstcount for 1000 extends improved from ~14sec to ~9sec.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
/Jarkko
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> index 993328ae988c..8b55fdaa67f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,12 @@
> #include "tpm.h"
> #include "tpm_tis_core.h"
>
> +/* This is a polling delay to check for status and burstcount.
> + * As per ddwg input, expectation is that status check and burstcount
> + * check should return within few usecs.
> + */
> +#define TPM_POLL_SLEEP 1 /* msec */
> +
> static bool wait_for_tpm_stat_cond(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask,
> bool check_cancel, bool *canceled)
> {
> @@ -82,7 +88,7 @@ static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask,
> }
> } else {
> do {
> - tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT);
> + tpm_msleep(TPM_POLL_SLEEP);
> status = chip->ops->status(chip);
> if ((status & mask) == mask)
> return 0;
> @@ -224,7 +230,7 @@ static int get_burstcount(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> burstcnt = (value >> 8) & 0xFFFF;
> if (burstcnt)
> return burstcnt;
> - tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT);
> + tpm_msleep(TPM_POLL_SLEEP);
> } while (time_before(jiffies, stop));
> return -EBUSY;
> }
> --
> 2.13.3
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com (Jarkko Sakkinen)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/4] tpm: reduce tpm polling delay in tpm_tis_core
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 18:24:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171018152447.b6scwbbmulrfzymw@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171017203232.2262-4-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:32:31PM -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> The existing wait_for_tpm_stat() polls for the chip status after
> 5msec sleep. As per TCG ddwg input, it is expected that tpm might
> return status in few usec. So, reducing the delay in polling to
> 1msec.
> Similarly, get_burstcount() function sleeps for 5msec before
> retrying for next query to burstcount in a loop. If it takes
> lesser time for TPM to return, this 5msec delay is longer than
> necessary.
>
> After this change, performance on a TPM 1.2 with an 8 byte
> burstcount for 1000 extends improved from ~14sec to ~9sec.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
/Jarkko
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> index 993328ae988c..8b55fdaa67f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,12 @@
> #include "tpm.h"
> #include "tpm_tis_core.h"
>
> +/* This is a polling delay to check for status and burstcount.
> + * As per ddwg input, expectation is that status check and burstcount
> + * check should return within few usecs.
> + */
> +#define TPM_POLL_SLEEP 1 /* msec */
> +
> static bool wait_for_tpm_stat_cond(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask,
> bool check_cancel, bool *canceled)
> {
> @@ -82,7 +88,7 @@ static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask,
> }
> } else {
> do {
> - tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT);
> + tpm_msleep(TPM_POLL_SLEEP);
> status = chip->ops->status(chip);
> if ((status & mask) == mask)
> return 0;
> @@ -224,7 +230,7 @@ static int get_burstcount(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> burstcnt = (value >> 8) & 0xFFFF;
> if (burstcnt)
> return burstcnt;
> - tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT);
> + tpm_msleep(TPM_POLL_SLEEP);
> } while (time_before(jiffies, stop));
> return -EBUSY;
> }
> --
> 2.13.3
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-18 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-17 20:32 [PATCH v4 0/4] additional TPM performance improvements Nayna Jain
2017-10-17 20:32 ` Nayna Jain
2017-10-17 20:32 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] tpm: move wait_for_tpm_stat() to respective driver files Nayna Jain
2017-10-17 20:32 ` Nayna Jain
2017-10-19 14:21 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-19 14:21 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-19 17:00 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-19 17:00 ` Alexander.Steffen at infineon.com
2017-10-20 8:56 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-20 8:56 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-23 13:32 ` Nayna Jain
2017-10-23 13:32 ` Nayna Jain
2017-10-23 13:32 ` Nayna Jain
2017-10-24 13:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-24 13:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-17 20:32 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] tpm: ignore burstcount to improve tpm_tis send() performance Nayna Jain
2017-10-17 20:32 ` Nayna Jain
2017-10-18 15:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-18 15:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-19 14:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-19 14:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-20 14:42 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-20 14:42 ` Alexander.Steffen at infineon.com
2017-10-20 18:02 ` Ken Goldman
2017-10-20 18:02 ` Ken Goldman
2017-10-23 2:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-23 2:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-07 18:29 ` Nayna Jain
2017-11-07 18:29 ` Nayna Jain
2017-11-07 18:29 ` Nayna Jain
2017-11-08 11:32 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-11-08 11:32 ` Alexander.Steffen at infineon.com
2017-11-16 14:34 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-11-16 14:34 ` Alexander.Steffen at infineon.com
2017-11-22 6:52 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-11-22 6:52 ` Alexander.Steffen at infineon.com
2017-11-23 14:47 ` Nayna Jain
2017-11-23 14:47 ` Nayna Jain
2017-11-23 16:19 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-11-23 16:19 ` Alexander.Steffen at infineon.com
2017-11-26 15:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-26 15:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-26 16:37 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-11-26 16:37 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-11-27 7:08 ` Leendert van Doorn
2017-11-27 7:08 ` Leendert van Doorn
2017-11-27 7:08 ` Leendert van Doorn
2017-11-27 13:22 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-11-27 13:22 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-11-27 13:22 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-11-28 20:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-28 20:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-17 20:32 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] tpm: reduce tpm polling delay in tpm_tis_core Nayna Jain
2017-10-17 20:32 ` Nayna Jain
2017-10-18 15:24 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2017-10-18 15:24 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-19 14:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-19 14:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-17 20:32 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] tpm: use tpm_msleep() value as max delay Nayna Jain
2017-10-17 20:32 ` Nayna Jain
2017-10-19 14:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-19 14:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171018152447.b6scwbbmulrfzymw@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=patrickc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=tpmdd@selhorst.net \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.