All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com,
	wei.w.wang@intel.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_balloon: fix deadlock on OOM
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:19:40 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171018201700-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201710132306.FBC78628.OJLHFVQSFOtOMF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:06:23PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > This is a replacement for
> > 	[PATCH] virtio: avoid possible OOM lockup at virtballoon_oom_notify()
> > but unlike that patch it actually deflates on oom even in presence of
> > lock contention.
> 
> But Wei Wang is proposing VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_SG which will try to allocate
> memory, isn't he?

Hopefully that can be fixed by allocating outside the lock.


> > 
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c    | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  include/linux/balloon_compaction.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  mm/balloon_compaction.c            | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> > index f0b3a0b..725e366 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> > @@ -143,16 +143,14 @@ static void set_page_pfns(struct virtio_balloon *vb,
> >  
> >  static unsigned fill_balloon(struct virtio_balloon *vb, size_t num)
> >  {
> > -	struct balloon_dev_info *vb_dev_info = &vb->vb_dev_info;
> >  	unsigned num_allocated_pages;
> > +	unsigned num_pfns;
> > +	struct page *page;
> > +	LIST_HEAD(pages);
> >  
> > -	/* We can only do one array worth at a time. */
> > -	num = min(num, ARRAY_SIZE(vb->pfns));
> > -
> 
> I don't think moving this min() to later is correct, for
> "num" can be e.g. 1048576, can't it?


Good catch, will fix. Thanks!

> > -	mutex_lock(&vb->balloon_lock);
> > -	for (vb->num_pfns = 0; vb->num_pfns < num;
> > -	     vb->num_pfns += VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE) {
> > -		struct page *page = balloon_page_enqueue(vb_dev_info);
> > +	for (num_pfns = 0; num_pfns < num;
> > +	     num_pfns += VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE) {
> > +		struct page *page = balloon_page_alloc();
> >  
> >  		if (!page) {
> >  			dev_info_ratelimited(&vb->vdev->dev,
> > @@ -162,6 +160,22 @@ static unsigned fill_balloon(struct virtio_balloon *vb, size_t num)
> >  			msleep(200);
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> > +
> > +		balloon_page_push(&pages, page);
> > +	}
> 
> If balloon_page_alloc() did not fail, it will queue "num"
> (e.g. 1048576) pages into pages list, won't it?
> 
> > +
> > +	/* We can only do one array worth at a time. */
> > +	num = min(num, ARRAY_SIZE(vb->pfns));
> > +
> 
> Now we cap "num" to VIRTIO_BALLOON_ARRAY_PFNS_MAX (which is 256), but
> 
> > +	mutex_lock(&vb->balloon_lock);
> > +
> > +	vb->num_pfns = 0;
> > +
> > +	while ((page = balloon_page_pop(&pages))) {
> 
> this loop will repeat for e.g. 1048576 times, and
> 
> > +		balloon_page_enqueue(&vb->vb_dev_info, page);
> > +
> > +		vb->num_pfns += VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE;
> > +
> 
> we increment vb->num_pfns for e.g. 1048576 times which will go
> beyond VIRTIO_BALLOON_ARRAY_PFNS_MAX array index.
> 
> >  		set_page_pfns(vb, vb->pfns + vb->num_pfns, page);
> >  		vb->num_pages += VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE;
> >  		if (!virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev,

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com,
	wei.w.wang@intel.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_balloon: fix deadlock on OOM
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:19:40 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171018201700-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201710132306.FBC78628.OJLHFVQSFOtOMF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:06:23PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > This is a replacement for
> > 	[PATCH] virtio: avoid possible OOM lockup at virtballoon_oom_notify()
> > but unlike that patch it actually deflates on oom even in presence of
> > lock contention.
> 
> But Wei Wang is proposing VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_SG which will try to allocate
> memory, isn't he?

Hopefully that can be fixed by allocating outside the lock.


> > 
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c    | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  include/linux/balloon_compaction.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  mm/balloon_compaction.c            | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> > index f0b3a0b..725e366 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> > @@ -143,16 +143,14 @@ static void set_page_pfns(struct virtio_balloon *vb,
> >  
> >  static unsigned fill_balloon(struct virtio_balloon *vb, size_t num)
> >  {
> > -	struct balloon_dev_info *vb_dev_info = &vb->vb_dev_info;
> >  	unsigned num_allocated_pages;
> > +	unsigned num_pfns;
> > +	struct page *page;
> > +	LIST_HEAD(pages);
> >  
> > -	/* We can only do one array worth at a time. */
> > -	num = min(num, ARRAY_SIZE(vb->pfns));
> > -
> 
> I don't think moving this min() to later is correct, for
> "num" can be e.g. 1048576, can't it?


Good catch, will fix. Thanks!

> > -	mutex_lock(&vb->balloon_lock);
> > -	for (vb->num_pfns = 0; vb->num_pfns < num;
> > -	     vb->num_pfns += VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE) {
> > -		struct page *page = balloon_page_enqueue(vb_dev_info);
> > +	for (num_pfns = 0; num_pfns < num;
> > +	     num_pfns += VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE) {
> > +		struct page *page = balloon_page_alloc();
> >  
> >  		if (!page) {
> >  			dev_info_ratelimited(&vb->vdev->dev,
> > @@ -162,6 +160,22 @@ static unsigned fill_balloon(struct virtio_balloon *vb, size_t num)
> >  			msleep(200);
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> > +
> > +		balloon_page_push(&pages, page);
> > +	}
> 
> If balloon_page_alloc() did not fail, it will queue "num"
> (e.g. 1048576) pages into pages list, won't it?
> 
> > +
> > +	/* We can only do one array worth at a time. */
> > +	num = min(num, ARRAY_SIZE(vb->pfns));
> > +
> 
> Now we cap "num" to VIRTIO_BALLOON_ARRAY_PFNS_MAX (which is 256), but
> 
> > +	mutex_lock(&vb->balloon_lock);
> > +
> > +	vb->num_pfns = 0;
> > +
> > +	while ((page = balloon_page_pop(&pages))) {
> 
> this loop will repeat for e.g. 1048576 times, and
> 
> > +		balloon_page_enqueue(&vb->vb_dev_info, page);
> > +
> > +		vb->num_pfns += VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE;
> > +
> 
> we increment vb->num_pfns for e.g. 1048576 times which will go
> beyond VIRTIO_BALLOON_ARRAY_PFNS_MAX array index.
> 
> >  		set_page_pfns(vb, vb->pfns + vb->num_pfns, page);
> >  		vb->num_pages += VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE;
> >  		if (!virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev,

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-18 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-13 13:21 [PATCH] virtio_balloon: fix deadlock on OOM Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-10-13 13:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-10-13 13:44 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-13 13:44   ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-13 13:44 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-13 14:06 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-10-13 14:06   ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-10-18 17:19   ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2017-10-18 17:19     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-10-19  7:59     ` Wei Wang
2017-10-19  7:59     ` Wei Wang
2017-10-19  7:59       ` Wei Wang
2017-10-18 17:19   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-10-13 14:06 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-10-30  9:48 ` Wei Wang
2017-10-30  9:48   ` Wei Wang
2017-10-30  9:48 ` Wei Wang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-10-13 13:21 Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171018201700-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.