Re: [PATCH] mm: mlock: remove lru_add_drain_all()

[Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>]

On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:17:30 -0700
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> wrote:

> Recently we have observed high latency in mlock() in our generic
> library and noticed that users have started using tmpfs files even
> without swap and the latency was due to expensive remote LRU cache
> draining.
> 
> Is lru_add_drain_all() required by mlock()? The answer is no and the
> reason it is still in mlock() is to rapidly move mlocked pages to
> unevictable LRU. Without lru_add_drain_all() the mlocked pages which
> were on pagevec at mlock() time will be moved to evictable LRUs but
> will eventually be moved back to unevictable LRU by reclaim. So, we
> can safely remove lru_add_drain_all() from mlock(). Also there is no
> need for local lru_add_drain() as it will be called deep inside
> __mm_populate() (in follow_page_pte()).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
> ---

Does this perturb statistics around LRU pages in cgroups and meminfo
about where the pages actually belong?

Balbir Singh.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>