From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Fix zImage file size not aligned with CONFIG_EFI_STUB enabled
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:22:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171024092229.GA20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_t=7uZ91MbVUqNfTcxX+3HKPF1+ZjS2-2Mn-Wq6D9H6Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:13:09AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 24 October 2017 at 10:09, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> > The question is: do we want to know when additional sections get
> > emitted into the binary?
>
> Well, we need to know whether the size of zImage is a multiple of 512
> bytes. We could check that separately by adding the following as well
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_EFI_STUB
> ASSERT((_edata % 512 == 0), "zImage file size is not a multiple of 512 bytes")
ASSERT((_edata - _text) % 512 == 0, "EFI zImage file size is not a multiple of 512 bytes")
This would only catch them when EFI is enabled, which doesn't give very
good build coverage. I still prefer my solution over adding the assert
and a section for _edata - my solution catches it with EFI disabled as
well.
A variant on that would be this, which should catch additional sections
for EFI and non-EFI:
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
index b38dcef90756..9d0c5d80979a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -95,6 +95,10 @@ SECTIONS
_edata = .;
+ .image_end (NOLOAD) : {
+ _image_end = .;
+ }
+
_magic_sig = ZIMAGE_MAGIC(0x016f2818);
_magic_start = ZIMAGE_MAGIC(_start);
_magic_end = ZIMAGE_MAGIC(_edata);
@@ -119,3 +123,5 @@ SECTIONS
.stab.indexstr 0 : { *(.stab.indexstr) }
.comment 0 : { *(.comment) }
}
+
+ASSERT(image_end == end, "zImage file size is incorrect")
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Chris Zhong <chris.zhong@rock-chips.com>,
jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Fix zImage file size not aligned with CONFIG_EFI_STUB enabled
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:22:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171024092229.GA20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_t=7uZ91MbVUqNfTcxX+3HKPF1+ZjS2-2Mn-Wq6D9H6Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:13:09AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 24 October 2017 at 10:09, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> > The question is: do we want to know when additional sections get
> > emitted into the binary?
>
> Well, we need to know whether the size of zImage is a multiple of 512
> bytes. We could check that separately by adding the following as well
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_EFI_STUB
> ASSERT((_edata % 512 == 0), "zImage file size is not a multiple of 512 bytes")
ASSERT((_edata - _text) % 512 == 0, "EFI zImage file size is not a multiple of 512 bytes")
This would only catch them when EFI is enabled, which doesn't give very
good build coverage. I still prefer my solution over adding the assert
and a section for _edata - my solution catches it with EFI disabled as
well.
A variant on that would be this, which should catch additional sections
for EFI and non-EFI:
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
index b38dcef90756..9d0c5d80979a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -95,6 +95,10 @@ SECTIONS
_edata = .;
+ .image_end (NOLOAD) : {
+ _image_end = .;
+ }
+
_magic_sig = ZIMAGE_MAGIC(0x016f2818);
_magic_start = ZIMAGE_MAGIC(_start);
_magic_end = ZIMAGE_MAGIC(_edata);
@@ -119,3 +123,5 @@ SECTIONS
.stab.indexstr 0 : { *(.stab.indexstr) }
.comment 0 : { *(.comment) }
}
+
+ASSERT(image_end == end, "zImage file size is incorrect")
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-24 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-18 5:01 [PATCH] ARM: Fix zImage file size not aligned with CONFIG_EFI_STUB enabled Jeffy Chen
2017-10-18 5:01 ` Jeffy Chen
2017-10-18 6:19 ` Chris Zhong
2017-10-18 6:19 ` Chris Zhong
2017-10-22 11:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-22 11:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-22 12:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-22 12:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-22 13:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-22 13:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-23 3:26 ` jeffy
2017-10-23 3:26 ` jeffy
2017-10-23 8:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-23 8:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-23 10:24 ` jeffy
2017-10-23 10:24 ` jeffy
2017-10-23 10:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-23 10:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-23 11:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-23 11:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-24 8:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-24 8:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-24 9:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-24 9:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-24 9:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-24 9:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-24 9:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2017-10-24 9:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-24 9:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-24 9:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-24 9:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-24 9:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-24 9:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-24 9:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-24 9:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-24 9:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-24 9:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-24 9:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-24 10:03 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-24 10:03 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-24 9:16 ` jeffy
2017-10-24 9:16 ` jeffy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171024092229.GA20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.