* [PATCH] rxrpc: call_accept: use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG
@ 2017-10-24 16:23 Gustavo A. R. Silva
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2017-10-24 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, Gustavo A. R. Silva
Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG.
This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
---
net/rxrpc/call_accept.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_accept.c b/net/rxrpc/call_accept.c
index cbd1701..1fd270f 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/call_accept.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/call_accept.c
@@ -387,8 +387,7 @@ struct rxrpc_call *rxrpc_new_incoming_call(struct rxrpc_local *local,
* event and userspace is prevented from doing so until the state is
* appropriate.
*/
- if (!mutex_trylock(&call->user_mutex))
- BUG();
+ BUG_ON(!mutex_trylock(&call->user_mutex));
/* Make the call live. */
rxrpc_incoming_call(rx, call, skb);
@@ -543,8 +542,7 @@ struct rxrpc_call *rxrpc_accept_call(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
rxrpc_get_call(call, rxrpc_call_got_userid);
rb_link_node(&call->sock_node, parent, pp);
rb_insert_color(&call->sock_node, &rx->calls);
- if (test_and_set_bit(RXRPC_CALL_HAS_USERID, &call->flags))
- BUG();
+ BUG_ON(test_and_set_bit(RXRPC_CALL_HAS_USERID, &call->flags));
write_unlock_bh(&call->state_lock);
write_unlock(&rx->call_lock);
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2017-10-24 16:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-10-24 16:23 [PATCH] rxrpc: call_accept: use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG Gustavo A. R. Silva
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.