From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"Christoffer Dall" <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
"Marc Zyngier" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"James Hogan" <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Christoffer Dall" <cdall@linaro.org>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm: whitelist struct kvm_vcpu_arch
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:13:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171026161242.017bcb9b.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171026134547.23664-2-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 15:45:46 +0200
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> On x86, ARM and s390, struct kvm_vcpu_arch has a usercopy region
> taht is read and written by the KVM_GET/SET_CPUID2 ioctls (x86)
> or KVM_GET/SET_ONE_REG (ARM/s390). Without whitelisting the area,
> KVM is completely broken on those architectures with usercopy hardening
> enabled.
>
> For now, allow writing to the entire struct on all architectures.
> The KVM tree will not refine this to an architecture-specific
> subset of struct kvm_vcpu_arch.
>
> Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@redhat.com>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 4d81f6ded88e..b4809ccfdfa1 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -4005,8 +4005,12 @@ int kvm_init(void *opaque, unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align,
> /* A kmem cache lets us meet the alignment requirements of fx_save. */
> if (!vcpu_align)
> vcpu_align = __alignof__(struct kvm_vcpu);
> - kvm_vcpu_cache = kmem_cache_create("kvm_vcpu", vcpu_size, vcpu_align,
> - 0, NULL);
> + kvm_vcpu_cache =
> + kmem_cache_create_usercopy("kvm_vcpu",
> + sizeof(struct kvm_vcpu), vcpu_align,
> + 0, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch),
> + sizeof_field(struct kvm_vcpu, arch),
> + NULL);
> if (!kvm_vcpu_cache) {
> r = -ENOMEM;
> goto out_free_3;
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"Christoffer Dall" <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
"Marc Zyngier" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"James Hogan" <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Christoffer Dall" <cdall@linaro.org>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm: whitelist struct kvm_vcpu_arch
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:13:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171026161242.017bcb9b.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171026134547.23664-2-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 15:45:46 +0200
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> On x86, ARM and s390, struct kvm_vcpu_arch has a usercopy region
> taht is read and written by the KVM_GET/SET_CPUID2 ioctls (x86)
> or KVM_GET/SET_ONE_REG (ARM/s390). Without whitelisting the area,
> KVM is completely broken on those architectures with usercopy hardening
> enabled.
>
> For now, allow writing to the entire struct on all architectures.
> The KVM tree will not refine this to an architecture-specific
> subset of struct kvm_vcpu_arch.
>
> Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@redhat.com>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 4d81f6ded88e..b4809ccfdfa1 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -4005,8 +4005,12 @@ int kvm_init(void *opaque, unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align,
> /* A kmem cache lets us meet the alignment requirements of fx_save. */
> if (!vcpu_align)
> vcpu_align = __alignof__(struct kvm_vcpu);
> - kvm_vcpu_cache = kmem_cache_create("kvm_vcpu", vcpu_size, vcpu_align,
> - 0, NULL);
> + kvm_vcpu_cache =
> + kmem_cache_create_usercopy("kvm_vcpu",
> + sizeof(struct kvm_vcpu), vcpu_align,
> + 0, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch),
> + sizeof_field(struct kvm_vcpu, arch),
> + NULL);
> if (!kvm_vcpu_cache) {
> r = -ENOMEM;
> goto out_free_3;
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-26 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-26 13:45 [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: fixes for the kernel-hardening tree Paolo Bonzini
2017-10-26 13:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-10-26 13:45 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 1/2] kvm: whitelist struct kvm_vcpu_arch Paolo Bonzini
2017-10-26 13:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-10-26 14:13 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2017-10-26 14:13 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-10-26 14:21 ` [kernel-hardening] " Christoffer Dall
2017-10-26 14:21 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-26 14:34 ` [kernel-hardening] " Marc Zyngier
2017-10-26 14:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-26 14:51 ` [kernel-hardening] " Christian Borntraeger
2017-10-26 14:51 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-10-30 23:28 ` [kernel-hardening] " Eric Biggers
2017-10-30 23:51 ` Kees Cook
2017-10-26 13:45 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 2/2] kvm: x86: fix KVM_XEN_HVM_CONFIG ioctl Paolo Bonzini
2017-10-26 13:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-10-26 13:48 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-10-26 13:48 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-30 20:40 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-11-30 20:40 ` Kees Cook
2017-12-01 8:29 ` [kernel-hardening] " Paolo Bonzini
2017-12-01 8:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-10-27 5:25 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: fixes for the kernel-hardening tree Paul Mackerras
2017-10-27 5:25 ` Paul Mackerras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171026161242.017bcb9b.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cdall@linaro.org \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.