* [RFC] perf script: modify field selection option
@ 2017-11-20 20:53 Stephane Eranian
2017-11-20 22:37 ` David Ahern
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephane Eranian @ 2017-11-20 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Jiri Olsa, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Peter Zijlstra, mingo,
Andi Kleen, David Ahern
Hi,
I have been using the perf script -F option on the latest perf and I
find it not very convenient to use. I appreciate the + and - prefix to
field names to add or suppress them. But most of the time, I want to
print only one or two fields and I have to guess which ones are there
by default so I can suppress them. I think there should be a way to
say: start from no fields. I understand why you have default to
maintain compatibility with older perf script but I would like a
syntax to say: remove defaults. For instance:
$ perf script -F --,+ip,+syms .....
Where -- would mean drop all defaults.
Any better suggestions?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] perf script: modify field selection option
2017-11-20 20:53 [RFC] perf script: modify field selection option Stephane Eranian
@ 2017-11-20 22:37 ` David Ahern
2017-11-20 22:50 ` Milian Wolff
2017-11-21 14:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2017-11-20 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephane Eranian, LKML
Cc: Jiri Olsa, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Peter Zijlstra, mingo,
Andi Kleen
On 11/20/17 1:53 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using the perf script -F option on the latest perf and I
> find it not very convenient to use. I appreciate the + and - prefix to
> field names to add or suppress them. But most of the time, I want to
> print only one or two fields and I have to guess which ones are there
> by default so I can suppress them. I think there should be a way to
> say: start from no fields. I understand why you have default to
> maintain compatibility with older perf script but I would like a
> syntax to say: remove defaults. For instance:
>
> $ perf script -F --,+ip,+syms .....
>
> Where -- would mean drop all defaults.
>
> Any better suggestions?
>
-all,... ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] perf script: modify field selection option
2017-11-20 20:53 [RFC] perf script: modify field selection option Stephane Eranian
2017-11-20 22:37 ` David Ahern
@ 2017-11-20 22:50 ` Milian Wolff
2017-11-20 23:21 ` Stephane Eranian
2017-11-21 14:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Milian Wolff @ 2017-11-20 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephane Eranian
Cc: LKML, Jiri Olsa, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Peter Zijlstra, mingo,
Andi Kleen, David Ahern
On Montag, 20. November 2017 21:53:04 CET Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using the perf script -F option on the latest perf and I
> find it not very convenient to use. I appreciate the + and - prefix to
> field names to add or suppress them. But most of the time, I want to
> print only one or two fields and I have to guess which ones are there
> by default so I can suppress them. I think there should be a way to
> say: start from no fields. I understand why you have default to
> maintain compatibility with older perf script but I would like a
> syntax to say: remove defaults. For instance:
>
> $ perf script -F --,+ip,+syms .....
>
> Where -- would mean drop all defaults.
>
> Any better suggestions?
Isn't `perf script -F ip,sym` what you want? Note the lack of any '+':
$ perf script -F ip,sym | head -n 5
206aad x86_pmu_enable
380591 ctx_resched
380b46 __perf_event_enable
378716 event_function
Cheers
--
Milian Wolff | milian.wolff@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] perf script: modify field selection option
2017-11-20 22:50 ` Milian Wolff
@ 2017-11-20 23:21 ` Stephane Eranian
2017-11-21 14:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephane Eranian @ 2017-11-20 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Milian Wolff
Cc: LKML, Jiri Olsa, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Peter Zijlstra, mingo,
Andi Kleen, David Ahern
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com> wrote:
> On Montag, 20. November 2017 21:53:04 CET Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have been using the perf script -F option on the latest perf and I
>> find it not very convenient to use. I appreciate the + and - prefix to
>> field names to add or suppress them. But most of the time, I want to
>> print only one or two fields and I have to guess which ones are there
>> by default so I can suppress them. I think there should be a way to
>> say: start from no fields. I understand why you have default to
>> maintain compatibility with older perf script but I would like a
>> syntax to say: remove defaults. For instance:
>>
>> $ perf script -F --,+ip,+syms .....
>>
>> Where -- would mean drop all defaults.
>>
>> Any better suggestions?
>
> Isn't `perf script -F ip,sym` what you want? Note the lack of any '+':
>
> $ perf script -F ip,sym | head -n 5
>
> 206aad x86_pmu_enable
> 380591 ctx_resched
> 380b46 __perf_event_enable
> 378716 event_function
>
Ah, yes, looks like it.
problem solved then.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] perf script: modify field selection option
2017-11-20 20:53 [RFC] perf script: modify field selection option Stephane Eranian
2017-11-20 22:37 ` David Ahern
2017-11-20 22:50 ` Milian Wolff
@ 2017-11-21 14:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2017-11-21 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephane Eranian
Cc: LKML, Jiri Olsa, Peter Zijlstra, mingo, Andi Kleen, David Ahern
Em Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:53:04PM -0800, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using the perf script -F option on the latest perf and I
> find it not very convenient to use. I appreciate the + and - prefix to
> field names to add or suppress them. But most of the time, I want to
> print only one or two fields and I have to guess which ones are there
> by default so I can suppress them. I think there should be a way to
> say: start from no fields. I understand why you have default to
> maintain compatibility with older perf script but I would like a
> syntax to say: remove defaults. For instance:
>
> $ perf script -F --,+ip,+syms .....
>
> Where -- would mean drop all defaults.
$ perf script -F -*,+ip,+syms
But perhaps using a new option and do away with all those prefixes?
- Arnaldo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] perf script: modify field selection option
2017-11-20 23:21 ` Stephane Eranian
@ 2017-11-21 14:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2017-11-21 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephane Eranian
Cc: Milian Wolff, LKML, Jiri Olsa, Peter Zijlstra, mingo, Andi Kleen,
David Ahern
Em Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 03:21:01PM -0800, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com> wrote:
> > On Montag, 20. November 2017 21:53:04 CET Stephane Eranian wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have been using the perf script -F option on the latest perf and I
> >> find it not very convenient to use. I appreciate the + and - prefix to
> >> field names to add or suppress them. But most of the time, I want to
> >> print only one or two fields and I have to guess which ones are there
> >> by default so I can suppress them. I think there should be a way to
> >> say: start from no fields. I understand why you have default to
> >> maintain compatibility with older perf script but I would like a
> >> syntax to say: remove defaults. For instance:
> >>
> >> $ perf script -F --,+ip,+syms .....
> >>
> >> Where -- would mean drop all defaults.
> >>
> >> Any better suggestions?
> >
> > Isn't `perf script -F ip,sym` what you want? Note the lack of any '+':
> >
> > $ perf script -F ip,sym | head -n 5
> >
> > 206aad x86_pmu_enable
> > 380591 ctx_resched
> > 380b46 __perf_event_enable
> > 378716 event_function
> >
> Ah, yes, looks like it.
> problem solved then.
> Thanks.
Even more intuitive :-)
- Arnaldo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-21 14:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-11-20 20:53 [RFC] perf script: modify field selection option Stephane Eranian
2017-11-20 22:37 ` David Ahern
2017-11-20 22:50 ` Milian Wolff
2017-11-20 23:21 ` Stephane Eranian
2017-11-21 14:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-11-21 14:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.