[PATCH 1/2] doc: Clarify wording regarding actions and flow rules.

[PATCH 1/2] doc: Clarify wording regarding actions and flow rules.

[Roy Franz]

Current wording regarding actions and flow rules doesn't make sense.

Signed-off-by: Roy Franz <roy.franz@cavium.com>
---
Maybe a better word than 'assigned' could be chosen?  (attached,
 associated with, etc)  I'm happy to spin this if needed.


 doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
index d158be5e4..9de6d32d3 100644
--- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
@@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ Actions
 ~~~~~~~
 
 Each possible action is represented by a type. Some have associated
-configuration structures. Several actions combined in a list can be affected
+configuration structures. Several actions combined in a list can be assigned
 to a flow rule. That list is not ordered.
 
 They fall in three categories:
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 2/2] doc: Fix typo

[Roy Franz]

Fix trivial typo (an -> and) in description of service core masks.

Signed-off-by: Roy Franz <roy.franz@cavium.com>
---
 doc/guides/prog_guide/service_cores.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/service_cores.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/service_cores.rst
index 3a029ba9c..5a8d8941a 100644
--- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/service_cores.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/service_cores.rst
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Service Core Initialization
 There are two methods to having service cores in a DPDK application, either by
 using the service coremask, or by dynamically adding cores using the API.
 The simpler of the two is to pass the `-s` coremask argument to EAL, which will
-take any cores available in the main DPDK coremask, an if the bits are also set
+take any cores available in the main DPDK coremask, and if the bits are also set
 in the service coremask the cores become service-cores instead of DPDK
 application lcores.
 
-- 
2.11.0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: Fix typo

[Mcnamara, John]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Roy Franz
> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 6:27 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Roy Franz <roy.franz@cavium.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] doc: Fix typo
> 
> Fix trivial typo (an -> and) in description of service core masks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roy Franz <roy.franz@cavium.com>

Thanks. For future reference the subject line should be lowercase like:

    doc: fix typo

Or better

    doc: fix typo in service cores doc

See: http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/patches.html#commit-messages-subject-line

Apart from that,

Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>

Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: Fix typo

[Thomas Monjalon]

11/12/2017 16:20, Mcnamara, John:
> > Fix trivial typo (an -> and) in description of service core masks.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Roy Franz <roy.franz@cavium.com>
> 
> Thanks. For future reference the subject line should be lowercase like:
> 
>     doc: fix typo
> 
> Or better
> 
>     doc: fix typo in service cores doc

Better to use "guide" when fixing a guide:

	doc: fix typo in prog guide

> See: http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/patches.html#commit-messages-subject-line
> 
> Apart from that,
> 
> Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>

Series applied, thanks

Re: [PATCH 1/2] doc: Clarify wording regarding actions and flow rules.

[Adrien Mazarguil]

On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 10:26:39AM -0800, Roy Franz wrote:
> Current wording regarding actions and flow rules doesn't make sense.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roy Franz <roy.franz@cavium.com>
> ---
> Maybe a better word than 'assigned' could be chosen?  (attached,
>  associated with, etc)  I'm happy to spin this if needed.

Agreed, "affected" doesn't make much sense here. I think "assigned" is the
best compromise (intelligibility / changes ratio).

This clarification is also a worthy candidate for stable@dpdk.org.

Acked-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>

-- 
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND