All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: cpu_errata: Add Kryo to Falkor 1003 errata
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 18:11:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171212181156.GA25244@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171129230353.11809-1-sboyd@codeaurora.org>

Hi Stephen,

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 03:03:53PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> The Kryo CPUs are also affected by the Falkor 1003 errata, so
> we need to do the same workaround on Kryo CPUs. The MIDR is
> slightly more complicated here, where the PART number is not
> always the same when looking at all the bits from 15 to 4. Drop
> the lower 8 bits and just look at the top 4 to see if it's '2'
> and then consider those as Kryo CPUs. This covers all the
> combinations without having to list them all out.
> 
> Introduce a new hardware cap bit for the combination of hardware
> PAN support and this errata so that we can disable support for
> software PAN at runtime if this errata is present and the CPU
> doesn't support HW PAN. This happens on some Kryo CPUs where the
> HW PAN feature isn't supported but we can't prevent software PAN
> from being selected in the configuration. Previously, Falkor CPUs
> were all known to have HW PAN support, so we didn't need to worry
> about this case.
> 
> Fixes: 38fd94b0275c ("arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1003")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---

Can you respin this on top of for-next/core please? The PAN bits should
be much simpler with the KPTI code.

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] arm64: cpu_errata: Add Kryo to Falkor 1003 errata
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 18:11:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171212181156.GA25244@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171129230353.11809-1-sboyd@codeaurora.org>

Hi Stephen,

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 03:03:53PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> The Kryo CPUs are also affected by the Falkor 1003 errata, so
> we need to do the same workaround on Kryo CPUs. The MIDR is
> slightly more complicated here, where the PART number is not
> always the same when looking at all the bits from 15 to 4. Drop
> the lower 8 bits and just look at the top 4 to see if it's '2'
> and then consider those as Kryo CPUs. This covers all the
> combinations without having to list them all out.
> 
> Introduce a new hardware cap bit for the combination of hardware
> PAN support and this errata so that we can disable support for
> software PAN at runtime if this errata is present and the CPU
> doesn't support HW PAN. This happens on some Kryo CPUs where the
> HW PAN feature isn't supported but we can't prevent software PAN
> from being selected in the configuration. Previously, Falkor CPUs
> were all known to have HW PAN support, so we didn't need to worry
> about this case.
> 
> Fixes: 38fd94b0275c ("arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1003")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---

Can you respin this on top of for-next/core please? The PAN bits should
be much simpler with the KPTI code.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-12 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-29 23:03 [PATCH v2] arm64: cpu_errata: Add Kryo to Falkor 1003 errata Stephen Boyd
2017-11-29 23:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-12-12 18:11 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2017-12-12 18:11   ` Will Deacon
2017-12-13 21:31   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-12-13 21:31     ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171212181156.GA25244@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.