From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, jhugo@codeaurora.org,
wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com, Jonathan.Zhang@cavium.com,
ahs3@redhat.com, Jayachandran.Nair@cavium.com,
austinwc@codeaurora.org, lenb@kernel.org,
morten.rasmussen@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/9] arm64: Topology, rename cluster_id
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:02:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171213180217.GB4060@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171201222330.18863-8-jeremy.linton@arm.com>
[+Morten, Dietmar]
$SUBJECT should be:
arm64: topology: rename cluster_id
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 04:23:28PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Lets match the name of the arm64 topology field
> to the kernel macro that uses it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
> index c4f2d50491eb..118136268f66 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
> @@ -7,14 +7,14 @@
> struct cpu_topology {
> int thread_id;
> int core_id;
> - int cluster_id;
> + int physical_id;
package_id ?
It has been debated before, I know. Should we keep the cluster_id too
(even if it would be 1:1 mapped to package_id - for now) ?
There is also arch/arm to take into account, again, this patch is
just renaming (as it should have named since the beginning) a
topology level but we should consider everything from a legacy
perspective.
Lorenzo
> cpumask_t thread_sibling;
> cpumask_t core_sibling;
> };
>
> extern struct cpu_topology cpu_topology[NR_CPUS];
>
> -#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id)
> +#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].physical_id)
> #define topology_core_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].core_id)
> #define topology_core_cpumask(cpu) (&cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling)
> #define topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu) (&cpu_topology[cpu].thread_sibling)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> index 8d48b233e6ce..74a8a5173a35 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static int __init get_cpu_for_node(struct device_node *node)
> return -1;
> }
>
> -static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core, int cluster_id,
> +static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core, int physical_id,
> int core_id)
> {
> char name[10];
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core, int cluster_id,
> leaf = false;
> cpu = get_cpu_for_node(t);
> if (cpu >= 0) {
> - cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id = cluster_id;
> + cpu_topology[cpu].physical_id = physical_id;
> cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = core_id;
> cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id = i;
> } else {
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core, int cluster_id,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id = cluster_id;
> + cpu_topology[cpu].physical_id = physical_id;
> cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = core_id;
> } else if (leaf) {
> pr_err("%pOF: Can't get CPU for leaf core\n", core);
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static int __init parse_cluster(struct device_node *cluster, int depth)
> bool leaf = true;
> bool has_cores = false;
> struct device_node *c;
> - static int cluster_id __initdata;
> + static int physical_id __initdata;
> int core_id = 0;
> int i, ret;
>
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int __init parse_cluster(struct device_node *cluster, int depth)
> }
>
> if (leaf) {
> - ret = parse_core(c, cluster_id, core_id++);
> + ret = parse_core(c, physical_id, core_id++);
> } else {
> pr_err("%pOF: Non-leaf cluster with core %s\n",
> cluster, name);
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static int __init parse_cluster(struct device_node *cluster, int depth)
> pr_warn("%pOF: empty cluster\n", cluster);
>
> if (leaf)
> - cluster_id++;
> + physical_id++;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static int __init parse_dt_topology(void)
> * only mark cores described in the DT as possible.
> */
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> - if (cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id == -1)
> + if (cpu_topology[cpu].physical_id == -1)
> ret = -EINVAL;
>
> out_map:
> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid)
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> cpu_topo = &cpu_topology[cpu];
>
> - if (cpuid_topo->cluster_id != cpu_topo->cluster_id)
> + if (cpuid_topo->physical_id != cpu_topo->physical_id)
> continue;
>
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->core_sibling);
> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
> struct cpu_topology *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid];
> u64 mpidr;
>
> - if (cpuid_topo->cluster_id != -1)
> + if (cpuid_topo->physical_id != -1)
> goto topology_populated;
>
> mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr();
> @@ -263,19 +263,19 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
> /* Multiprocessor system : Multi-threads per core */
> cpuid_topo->thread_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0);
> cpuid_topo->core_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1);
> - cpuid_topo->cluster_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 2) |
> + cpuid_topo->physical_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 2) |
> MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 3) << 8;
> } else {
> /* Multiprocessor system : Single-thread per core */
> cpuid_topo->thread_id = -1;
> cpuid_topo->core_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0);
> - cpuid_topo->cluster_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1) |
> + cpuid_topo->physical_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1) |
> MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 2) << 8 |
> MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 3) << 16;
> }
>
> pr_debug("CPU%u: cluster %d core %d thread %d mpidr %#016llx\n",
> - cpuid, cpuid_topo->cluster_id, cpuid_topo->core_id,
> + cpuid, cpuid_topo->physical_id, cpuid_topo->core_id,
> cpuid_topo->thread_id, mpidr);
>
> topology_populated:
> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static void __init reset_cpu_topology(void)
>
> cpu_topo->thread_id = -1;
> cpu_topo->core_id = 0;
> - cpu_topo->cluster_id = -1;
> + cpu_topo->physical_id = -1;
>
> cpumask_clear(&cpu_topo->core_sibling);
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_topo->core_sibling);
> @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ static void __init reset_cpu_topology(void)
> }
> }
>
> +
> void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
> {
> reset_cpu_topology();
> --
> 2.13.5
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 7/9] arm64: Topology, rename cluster_id
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:02:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171213180217.GB4060@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171201222330.18863-8-jeremy.linton@arm.com>
[+Morten, Dietmar]
$SUBJECT should be:
arm64: topology: rename cluster_id
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 04:23:28PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Lets match the name of the arm64 topology field
> to the kernel macro that uses it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
> index c4f2d50491eb..118136268f66 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
> @@ -7,14 +7,14 @@
> struct cpu_topology {
> int thread_id;
> int core_id;
> - int cluster_id;
> + int physical_id;
package_id ?
It has been debated before, I know. Should we keep the cluster_id too
(even if it would be 1:1 mapped to package_id - for now) ?
There is also arch/arm to take into account, again, this patch is
just renaming (as it should have named since the beginning) a
topology level but we should consider everything from a legacy
perspective.
Lorenzo
> cpumask_t thread_sibling;
> cpumask_t core_sibling;
> };
>
> extern struct cpu_topology cpu_topology[NR_CPUS];
>
> -#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id)
> +#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].physical_id)
> #define topology_core_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].core_id)
> #define topology_core_cpumask(cpu) (&cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling)
> #define topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu) (&cpu_topology[cpu].thread_sibling)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> index 8d48b233e6ce..74a8a5173a35 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static int __init get_cpu_for_node(struct device_node *node)
> return -1;
> }
>
> -static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core, int cluster_id,
> +static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core, int physical_id,
> int core_id)
> {
> char name[10];
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core, int cluster_id,
> leaf = false;
> cpu = get_cpu_for_node(t);
> if (cpu >= 0) {
> - cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id = cluster_id;
> + cpu_topology[cpu].physical_id = physical_id;
> cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = core_id;
> cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id = i;
> } else {
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core, int cluster_id,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id = cluster_id;
> + cpu_topology[cpu].physical_id = physical_id;
> cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = core_id;
> } else if (leaf) {
> pr_err("%pOF: Can't get CPU for leaf core\n", core);
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static int __init parse_cluster(struct device_node *cluster, int depth)
> bool leaf = true;
> bool has_cores = false;
> struct device_node *c;
> - static int cluster_id __initdata;
> + static int physical_id __initdata;
> int core_id = 0;
> int i, ret;
>
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int __init parse_cluster(struct device_node *cluster, int depth)
> }
>
> if (leaf) {
> - ret = parse_core(c, cluster_id, core_id++);
> + ret = parse_core(c, physical_id, core_id++);
> } else {
> pr_err("%pOF: Non-leaf cluster with core %s\n",
> cluster, name);
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static int __init parse_cluster(struct device_node *cluster, int depth)
> pr_warn("%pOF: empty cluster\n", cluster);
>
> if (leaf)
> - cluster_id++;
> + physical_id++;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static int __init parse_dt_topology(void)
> * only mark cores described in the DT as possible.
> */
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> - if (cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id == -1)
> + if (cpu_topology[cpu].physical_id == -1)
> ret = -EINVAL;
>
> out_map:
> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid)
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> cpu_topo = &cpu_topology[cpu];
>
> - if (cpuid_topo->cluster_id != cpu_topo->cluster_id)
> + if (cpuid_topo->physical_id != cpu_topo->physical_id)
> continue;
>
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->core_sibling);
> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
> struct cpu_topology *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid];
> u64 mpidr;
>
> - if (cpuid_topo->cluster_id != -1)
> + if (cpuid_topo->physical_id != -1)
> goto topology_populated;
>
> mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr();
> @@ -263,19 +263,19 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
> /* Multiprocessor system : Multi-threads per core */
> cpuid_topo->thread_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0);
> cpuid_topo->core_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1);
> - cpuid_topo->cluster_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 2) |
> + cpuid_topo->physical_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 2) |
> MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 3) << 8;
> } else {
> /* Multiprocessor system : Single-thread per core */
> cpuid_topo->thread_id = -1;
> cpuid_topo->core_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0);
> - cpuid_topo->cluster_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1) |
> + cpuid_topo->physical_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1) |
> MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 2) << 8 |
> MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 3) << 16;
> }
>
> pr_debug("CPU%u: cluster %d core %d thread %d mpidr %#016llx\n",
> - cpuid, cpuid_topo->cluster_id, cpuid_topo->core_id,
> + cpuid, cpuid_topo->physical_id, cpuid_topo->core_id,
> cpuid_topo->thread_id, mpidr);
>
> topology_populated:
> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static void __init reset_cpu_topology(void)
>
> cpu_topo->thread_id = -1;
> cpu_topo->core_id = 0;
> - cpu_topo->cluster_id = -1;
> + cpu_topo->physical_id = -1;
>
> cpumask_clear(&cpu_topo->core_sibling);
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_topo->core_sibling);
> @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ static void __init reset_cpu_topology(void)
> }
> }
>
> +
> void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
> {
> reset_cpu_topology();
> --
> 2.13.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-13 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 113+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-01 22:23 [PATCH v5 0/9] Support PPTT for ARM64 Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] arm64/acpi: Create arch specific cpu to acpi id helper Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] ACPI/PPTT: Add Processor Properties Topology Table parsing Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-12 1:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-12 1:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-01 22:23 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] ACPI: Enable PPTT support on ARM64 Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-13 17:26 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-12-13 17:26 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-01-05 21:58 ` Jeremy Linton
2018-01-05 21:58 ` Jeremy Linton
2018-01-05 22:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-05 22:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-01 22:23 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] drivers: base cacheinfo: Add support for ACPI based firmware tables Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-12 1:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-12 1:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-12 17:03 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-12 17:03 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-12 17:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-12 17:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-12 17:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-12 22:55 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-12 22:55 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-12 22:55 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-12 23:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-12 23:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-12 23:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-12 23:37 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-12 23:37 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-12 23:37 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-12 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-12 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-12 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-03 14:21 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-03 14:21 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-03 14:21 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-04 11:46 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-04 11:46 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-04 11:46 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-12-01 22:23 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] arm64: " Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] ACPI/PPTT: Add topology parsing code Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-12 1:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-12 1:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-12 16:13 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-12 16:13 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-13 17:38 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-12-13 17:38 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-12-13 22:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-13 22:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-13 22:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-13 23:06 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-13 23:06 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-13 23:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-13 23:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-13 23:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-03 8:49 ` vkilari
2018-01-03 8:49 ` vkilari
2018-01-03 8:49 ` vkilari at codeaurora.org
2018-01-03 16:57 ` Jeremy Linton
2018-01-03 16:57 ` Jeremy Linton
2018-01-03 16:57 ` Jeremy Linton
2018-01-04 6:48 ` vkilari
2018-01-04 6:48 ` vkilari
2018-01-04 6:48 ` vkilari at codeaurora.org
2018-01-04 17:50 ` Jeremy Linton
2018-01-04 17:50 ` Jeremy Linton
2018-01-04 17:50 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] arm64: Topology, rename cluster_id Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-13 18:02 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2017-12-13 18:02 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-12-15 16:36 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-15 16:36 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-18 12:42 ` Morten Rasmussen
2017-12-18 12:42 ` Morten Rasmussen
2017-12-18 15:47 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-12-18 15:47 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-12-19 9:38 ` Morten Rasmussen
2017-12-19 9:38 ` Morten Rasmussen
2018-01-02 2:29 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2018-01-02 2:29 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2018-01-02 2:29 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2018-01-02 11:30 ` Morten Rasmussen
2018-01-02 11:30 ` Morten Rasmussen
2018-01-03 14:29 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-03 14:29 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-03 17:32 ` Jeremy Linton
2018-01-03 17:32 ` Jeremy Linton
2018-01-03 17:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-03 17:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-04 3:59 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2018-01-04 3:59 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2018-01-04 3:59 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2018-01-04 18:00 ` Jeremy Linton
2018-01-04 18:00 ` Jeremy Linton
2018-01-04 4:14 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2018-01-04 4:14 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2018-01-04 4:14 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-12-01 22:23 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] arm64: topology: Enable ACPI/PPTT based CPU topology Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-13 18:22 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-12-13 18:22 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-12-15 17:42 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-15 17:42 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] ACPI: Add PPTT to injectable table list Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171213180217.GB4060@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Jayachandran.Nair@cavium.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Zhang@cavium.com \
--cc=ahs3@redhat.com \
--cc=austinwc@codeaurora.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.