From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: rao.shoaib@oracle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kfree_rcu() should use the new kfree_bulk() interface for freeing rcu structures
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:33:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171219203313.56d42bae@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1513705948-31072-1-git-send-email-rao.shoaib@oracle.com>
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:52:27 -0800 rao.shoaib@oracle.com wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
> index c8cb367..06fd12c 100644
> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> #include <asm/page.h>
> #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
>
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #include <trace/events/kmem.h>
> @@ -129,6 +130,7 @@ int __kmem_cache_alloc_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t nr,
>
> for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> void *x = p[i] = kmem_cache_alloc(s, flags);
> +
> if (!x) {
> __kmem_cache_free_bulk(s, i, p);
> return 0;
> @@ -353,6 +355,7 @@ unsigned long calculate_alignment(slab_flags_t flags,
> */
> if (flags & SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN) {
> unsigned long ralign = cache_line_size();
> +
> while (size <= ralign / 2)
> ralign /= 2;
> align = max(align, ralign);
> @@ -444,9 +447,8 @@ kmem_cache_create(const char *name, size_t size, size_t align,
> mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
>
> err = kmem_cache_sanity_check(name, size);
> - if (err) {
> + if (err)
> goto out_unlock;
> - }
>
> /* Refuse requests with allocator specific flags */
> if (flags & ~SLAB_FLAGS_PERMITTED) {
> @@ -1131,6 +1133,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmalloc_order);
> void *kmalloc_order_trace(size_t size, gfp_t flags, unsigned int order)
> {
> void *ret = kmalloc_order(size, flags, order);
> +
> trace_kmalloc(_RET_IP_, ret, size, PAGE_SIZE << order, flags);
> return ret;
> }
Looks like you are mixing in cleanups (which should be avoided, and
instead moved to another patch).
> @@ -1483,6 +1486,197 @@ void kzfree(const void *p)
[...]
> +
> +/* processes list of rcu structures
> + * used when conatiner can not be allocated
> + */
Spelling.
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: rao.shoaib@oracle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kfree_rcu() should use the new kfree_bulk() interface for freeing rcu structures
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:33:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171219203313.56d42bae@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1513705948-31072-1-git-send-email-rao.shoaib@oracle.com>
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:52:27 -0800 rao.shoaib@oracle.com wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
> index c8cb367..06fd12c 100644
> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> #include <asm/page.h>
> #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
>
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #include <trace/events/kmem.h>
> @@ -129,6 +130,7 @@ int __kmem_cache_alloc_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t nr,
>
> for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> void *x = p[i] = kmem_cache_alloc(s, flags);
> +
> if (!x) {
> __kmem_cache_free_bulk(s, i, p);
> return 0;
> @@ -353,6 +355,7 @@ unsigned long calculate_alignment(slab_flags_t flags,
> */
> if (flags & SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN) {
> unsigned long ralign = cache_line_size();
> +
> while (size <= ralign / 2)
> ralign /= 2;
> align = max(align, ralign);
> @@ -444,9 +447,8 @@ kmem_cache_create(const char *name, size_t size, size_t align,
> mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
>
> err = kmem_cache_sanity_check(name, size);
> - if (err) {
> + if (err)
> goto out_unlock;
> - }
>
> /* Refuse requests with allocator specific flags */
> if (flags & ~SLAB_FLAGS_PERMITTED) {
> @@ -1131,6 +1133,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmalloc_order);
> void *kmalloc_order_trace(size_t size, gfp_t flags, unsigned int order)
> {
> void *ret = kmalloc_order(size, flags, order);
> +
> trace_kmalloc(_RET_IP_, ret, size, PAGE_SIZE << order, flags);
> return ret;
> }
Looks like you are mixing in cleanups (which should be avoided, and
instead moved to another patch).
> @@ -1483,6 +1486,197 @@ void kzfree(const void *p)
[...]
> +
> +/* processes list of rcu structures
> + * used when conatiner can not be allocated
> + */
Spelling.
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-19 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-19 17:52 [PATCH] kfree_rcu() should use the new kfree_bulk() interface for freeing rcu structures rao.shoaib
2017-12-19 17:52 ` rao.shoaib
2017-12-19 19:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 19:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 19:42 ` Rao Shoaib
2017-12-19 19:42 ` Rao Shoaib
2017-12-19 19:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 19:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 19:56 ` Rao Shoaib
2017-12-19 19:56 ` Rao Shoaib
2017-12-19 20:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-19 20:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-19 19:33 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2017-12-19 19:33 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-19 19:33 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-12-19 19:33 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-12-19 20:02 ` Rao Shoaib
2017-12-19 20:02 ` Rao Shoaib
2017-12-20 0:56 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-12-20 0:56 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-12-20 18:14 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-20 18:14 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-20 14:17 ` Michal Hocko
2017-12-20 14:17 ` Michal Hocko
2017-12-19 20:41 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-19 20:41 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-19 20:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-19 20:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-19 21:20 ` Rao Shoaib
2017-12-19 21:20 ` Rao Shoaib
2017-12-20 7:31 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-20 7:31 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-19 22:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 22:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 23:25 ` Rao Shoaib
2017-12-19 23:25 ` Rao Shoaib
2017-12-20 0:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-20 0:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-20 1:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 1:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 5:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-20 5:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-20 7:06 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-20 7:06 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171219203313.56d42bae@redhat.com \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rao.shoaib@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.