From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: pali.rohar@gmail.com, sre@kernel.org,
"kernel list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, khilman@kernel.org,
aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com,
patrikbachan@gmail.com, serge@hallyn.com, abcloriens@gmail.com,
clayton@craftyguy.net, martijn@brixit.nl,
"Filip Matijević" <filip.matijevic.pz@gmail.com>,
laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: v4.15: camera problems on n900
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 22:39:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171227213956.GB9205@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171227211718.favif66afztygfje@kekkonen.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 816 bytes --]
1;2802;0cOn Wed 2017-12-27 23:17:19, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:05:43PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > In v4.14, back camera on N900 works. On v4.15-rc1.. it works for few
> > seconds, but then I get repeated oopses.
> >
> > On v4.15-rc0.5 (commit ed30b147e1f6e396e70a52dbb6c7d66befedd786),
> > camera does not start.
> >
> > Any ideas what might be wrong there?
>
> What kind of oopses do you get?
They seemed to be in unrelated processes -> not useful for
debugging. I tried again, but this time it hangs, similar way to
-rc0.5. (That might be good news).
Does it work for you on N9?
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: v4.15: camera problems on n900
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 22:39:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171227213956.GB9205@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171227211718.favif66afztygfje@kekkonen.localdomain>
1;2802;0cOn Wed 2017-12-27 23:17:19, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:05:43PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > In v4.14, back camera on N900 works. On v4.15-rc1.. it works for few
> > seconds, but then I get repeated oopses.
> >
> > On v4.15-rc0.5 (commit ed30b147e1f6e396e70a52dbb6c7d66befedd786),
> > camera does not start.
> >
> > Any ideas what might be wrong there?
>
> What kind of oopses do you get?
They seemed to be in unrelated processes -> not useful for
debugging. I tried again, but this time it hangs, similar way to
-rc0.5. (That might be good news).
Does it work for you on N9?
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20171227/e7892f96/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-27 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-27 21:05 v4.15: camera problems on n900 Pavel Machek
2017-12-27 21:05 ` Pavel Machek
2017-12-27 21:17 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-12-27 21:17 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-12-27 21:39 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2017-12-27 21:39 ` Pavel Machek
2017-12-28 11:26 ` Pavel Machek
2017-12-28 11:26 ` Pavel Machek
2017-12-28 20:24 ` Pavel Machek
2017-12-28 20:24 ` Pavel Machek
2017-12-29 9:38 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-12-29 9:38 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-12-29 9:38 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-12-29 16:30 ` Pavel Machek
2017-12-29 16:30 ` Pavel Machek
2018-02-19 19:04 ` next-20180219: " Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171227213956.GB9205@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=abcloriens@gmail.com \
--cc=clayton@craftyguy.net \
--cc=filip.matijevic.pz@gmail.com \
--cc=ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martijn@brixit.nl \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=patrikbachan@gmail.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.