From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: kan.liang@intel.com
Cc: acme@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangnan0@huawei.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, yao.jin@linux.intel.com,
kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 04/12] perf mmap: introduce perf_mmap__read_done
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 16:33:43 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180102073343.GA8810@sejong> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1513879734-237492-5-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:08:46AM -0800, kan.liang@intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
>
> The direction of overwrite mode is backward. The last mmap__read_event
> will set tail to map->prev. Need to correct the map->prev to head which
> is the end of next read.
Why do you update the map->prev needlessly then? I think we don't
need it for overwrite/backward mode, right?
Also I guess the current code might miss some events since the head
can be different between _read_init() and _read_done(), no?
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> It will be used later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/mmap.c | 11 +++++++++++
> tools/perf/util/mmap.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mmap.c b/tools/perf/util/mmap.c
> index a844a2f..4aaeb64 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/mmap.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/mmap.c
> @@ -343,3 +343,14 @@ int perf_mmap__push(struct perf_mmap *md, bool overwrite,
> out:
> return rc;
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * Mandatory for overwrite mode
> + * The direction of overwrite mode is backward.
> + * The last mmap__read_event will set tail to map->prev.
> + * Need to correct the map->prev to head which is the end of next read.
> + */
> +void perf_mmap__read_done(struct perf_mmap *map)
> +{
> + map->prev = perf_mmap__read_head(map);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mmap.h b/tools/perf/util/mmap.h
> index abe9b9f..2df27c1 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/mmap.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/mmap.h
> @@ -96,4 +96,5 @@ size_t perf_mmap__mmap_len(struct perf_mmap *map);
>
> int perf_mmap__read_init(struct perf_mmap *map, bool overwrite,
> u64 *start, u64 *end);
> +void perf_mmap__read_done(struct perf_mmap *map);
> #endif /*__PERF_MMAP_H */
> --
> 2.5.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-02 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-21 18:08 [PATCH V3 00/12] perf top overwrite mode kan.liang
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 01/12] perf evlist: remove stale mmap read for backward kan.liang
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 02/12] perf mmap: factor out function to find ringbuffer position kan.liang
2018-01-10 15:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-10 19:31 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-11 14:25 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:26 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-12 10:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 03/12] perf mmap: discard 'prev' in perf_mmap__read kan.liang
2018-01-11 14:25 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:27 ` Liang, Kan
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 04/12] perf mmap: introduce perf_mmap__read_done kan.liang
2018-01-02 7:33 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2018-01-03 14:15 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-04 2:46 ` Namhyung Kim
2018-01-04 14:00 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-09 7:12 ` Namhyung Kim
2018-01-09 15:12 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-11 12:00 ` Namhyung Kim
2018-01-11 14:40 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-11 14:25 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:27 ` Liang, Kan
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 05/12] perf mmap: introduce perf_mmap__read_event kan.liang
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 06/12] perf test: update mmap read functions for backward-ring-buffer test kan.liang
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 07/12] perf mmap: discard legacy interface for mmap read kan.liang
2018-01-11 14:25 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:28 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-12 10:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 08/12] perf top: check per event overwrite term kan.liang
2018-01-11 14:25 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:29 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-12 11:42 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-12 14:58 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-12 16:46 ` Liang, Kan
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 09/12] perf evsel: expose perf_missing_features.write_backward kan.liang
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 10/12] perf top: add overwrite fall back kan.liang
2018-01-11 14:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:30 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-12 11:42 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 11/12] perf top: switch default mode to overwrite mode kan.liang
2018-01-11 14:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:30 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-11 21:30 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-11 14:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 12/12] perf top: check the latency of perf_top__mmap_read kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180102073343.GA8810@sejong \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.