From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: kan.liang@intel.com
Cc: acme@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangnan0@huawei.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
yao.jin@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 02/12] perf mmap: factor out function to find ringbuffer position
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:25:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180111142520.GA16655@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1513879734-237492-3-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:08:44AM -0800, kan.liang@intel.com wrote:
SNIP
> +/*
> + * Report the start and end of the available data in ringbuffer
> + */
> +int perf_mmap__read_init(struct perf_mmap *map, bool overwrite,
> + u64 *start, u64 *end)
> {
> - u64 head = perf_mmap__read_head(md);
> - u64 old = md->prev;
> - u64 end = head, start = old;
> - unsigned char *data = md->base + page_size;
> + u64 head = perf_mmap__read_head(map);
> + u64 old = map->prev;
> + unsigned char *data = map->base + page_size;
> unsigned long size;
> - void *buf;
> - int rc = 0;
>
> - start = overwrite ? head : old;
> - end = overwrite ? old : head;
> + /*
> + * Check if event was unmapped due to a POLLHUP/POLLERR.
> + */
> + if (!refcount_read(&map->refcnt))
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (start == end)
> - return 0;
> + *start = overwrite ? head : old;
> + *end = overwrite ? old : head;
>
> - size = end - start;
> - if (size > (unsigned long)(md->mask) + 1) {
> + if (*start == *end)
> + return -EAGAIN;
> +
> + size = *end - *start;
> + if (size > (unsigned long)(map->mask) + 1) {
> if (!overwrite) {
> WARN_ONCE(1, "failed to keep up with mmap data. (warn only once)\n");
>
I know you did not change this, but is this leg even possible
in !overwrite mode? I think kernel will throw away the data,
keep the head and wait for tail to be read by user..
jirka
> - md->prev = head;
> - perf_mmap__consume(md, overwrite);
> - return 0;
> + map->prev = head;
> + perf_mmap__consume(map, overwrite);
> + return -EAGAIN;
SNIP
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-11 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-21 18:08 [PATCH V3 00/12] perf top overwrite mode kan.liang
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 01/12] perf evlist: remove stale mmap read for backward kan.liang
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 02/12] perf mmap: factor out function to find ringbuffer position kan.liang
2018-01-10 15:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-10 19:31 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-11 14:25 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2018-01-11 21:26 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-12 10:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 03/12] perf mmap: discard 'prev' in perf_mmap__read kan.liang
2018-01-11 14:25 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:27 ` Liang, Kan
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 04/12] perf mmap: introduce perf_mmap__read_done kan.liang
2018-01-02 7:33 ` Namhyung Kim
2018-01-03 14:15 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-04 2:46 ` Namhyung Kim
2018-01-04 14:00 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-09 7:12 ` Namhyung Kim
2018-01-09 15:12 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-11 12:00 ` Namhyung Kim
2018-01-11 14:40 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-11 14:25 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:27 ` Liang, Kan
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 05/12] perf mmap: introduce perf_mmap__read_event kan.liang
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 06/12] perf test: update mmap read functions for backward-ring-buffer test kan.liang
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 07/12] perf mmap: discard legacy interface for mmap read kan.liang
2018-01-11 14:25 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:28 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-12 10:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 08/12] perf top: check per event overwrite term kan.liang
2018-01-11 14:25 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:29 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-12 11:42 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-12 14:58 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-12 16:46 ` Liang, Kan
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 09/12] perf evsel: expose perf_missing_features.write_backward kan.liang
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 10/12] perf top: add overwrite fall back kan.liang
2018-01-11 14:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:30 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-12 11:42 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 11/12] perf top: switch default mode to overwrite mode kan.liang
2018-01-11 14:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:30 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-11 21:30 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-11 14:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 12/12] perf top: check the latency of perf_top__mmap_read kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180111142520.GA16655@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.