From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr>,
Han Xu <han.xu@nxp.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: nand: Check ONFI timings have been acked by the chip
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 16:13:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180105161321.44218e4e@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171222172853.27710-2-miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com>
On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 18:28:52 +0100
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Choosing ONFI timings when ->onfi_set/get_features() calls are supported
> by the NAND chip is a matter of reading the chip's ONFI parameter page
> and telling the chip the chosen mode (between all of the supported ones)
> with ->onfi_set_feature().
>
> Add a check on whether the chip "acked" the timing mode or not.
>
> This can be a problem for NAND chips that do not follow entirely the
> ONFI specification. These chips actually support other modes than
> "mode 0", but do not update the parameter page once a timing mode has
> been selected. This issue will be addressed in another patch that will
> add the feature to overwrite NAND chips features within the parameter
> page, from the NAND chip driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index 96c97588e1ba..ea862be6a803 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -1236,6 +1236,18 @@ static int nand_setup_data_interface(struct nand_chip *chip, int chipnr)
> tmode_param);
> if (ret)
> goto err;
> +
> + ret = chip->onfi_get_features(mtd, chip,
> + ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_TIMING_MODE,
> + tmode_param);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> +
> + if (tmode_param[0] != chip->onfi_timing_mode_default) {
> + pr_warn("timings mode %d not acknowledged by the NAND chip\n",
> + chip->onfi_timing_mode_default);
> + goto err;
> + }
Hm, I'm not sure this is safe. The spec says that new ONFI timing mode
is applied as soon the CS line is released after a
SET_FEATURES(ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_TIMING_MODE), and since we have no
guarantee that the CS will be kept low by the controller after
->onfi_set_features() returns we must assume the new mode has been
applied and call ->setup_data_interface() to instruct the controller
to apply new timings.
If you want to check if the mode has really been applied, you should
release the CS (->select_chip(-1)), re-acquire it
(->select_chip(X)), and call
->onfi_get_features(ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_TIMING_MODE). If it appears that
the mode has not been applied, you should restore timing mode 0 and
issue a RESET.
> }
>
> ret = chip->setup_data_interface(mtd, chipnr, &chip->data_interface);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-05 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-22 17:28 [PATCH 0/2] Migrate the GPMI driver to use NAND core timings Miquel Raynal
2017-12-22 17:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] mtd: nand: Check ONFI timings have been acked by the chip Miquel Raynal
2018-01-05 15:13 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-01-05 15:42 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2018-01-08 13:04 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-01-15 13:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-01-15 17:57 ` Han Xu
2018-01-15 18:41 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-01-15 20:05 ` Miquel Raynal
2017-12-22 17:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] mtd: nand: gpmi: Support ->setup_data_interface() Miquel Raynal
2018-01-06 10:24 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180105161321.44218e4e@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=han.xu@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.