[PATCH V4 0/4] Add SELinux SCTP protocol support

[marcelo.leitner@gmail.com (Marcelo Ricardo Leitner)]

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:39:45AM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Richard Haines
> <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com> wrote:
> > Note: Some conflicts are expected when merging with current net-next due to
> > Interleaving Data (I-DATA) sets of patches:
> > PATCH 2/4 - Where 'sctp_datachk_len(&asoc->stream)' has replaced
> > 'sizeof(struct sctp_data_chunk)' in include/net/sctp/sctp.h,
> > net/sctp/chunk.c and net/sctp/socket.c
> > PATCH 3/4 - Where include/uapi/linux/sctp.h requires a fix to update the
> > #define SCTP_SENDMSG_CONNECT to a higher number.
> >
> > These patches have been built on Fedora 27 with kernel 4.14.8 plus
> > the following userspace patches to enable testing:
> >
> > 1) Updates to libsepol 2.7 to support the sctp portcon statement.
> >    The patch is available from:
> >          http://arctic.selinuxproject.org/~rhaines/selinux-sctp/
> >          selinux-Add-support-for-the-SCTP-portcon-keyword.patch
> >
> > 2) Updates to the SELinux Test Suite adding SCTP tests. Please read the
> >    selinux-testsuite/README.sctp for details. The patch is available from:
> >          http://arctic.selinuxproject.org/~rhaines/selinux-sctp/
> >          selinux-testsuite-Add-SCTP-test-support.patch
> >
> > 3) Updates to lksctp-tools that show SELinux info in sctp_darn and
> >    sctp_test. It also contains a minor patch for test_1_to_1_connect.c
> >    as when CIPSO/CALIPSO configured, NetLabel returns a different error
> >    code for illegal addresses in test 5. The patch is available from:
> >          http://arctic.selinuxproject.org/~rhaines/selinux-sctp/
> >          lksctp-tools-Add-SELinux-support-to-sctp_test-and-sc.patch
> >
> > All SCTP lksctp-tools/src/func_tests run correctly in enforcing mode.
> >
> > All SCTP regression tests "./sctp-tests run" run correctly in enforcing
> > mode. These tests are obtained from: https://github.com/sctp/sctp-tests
> >
> > The selinux-testsuite patch also adds remote tests (that need some manual
> > configuration). These are useful for testing CIPSO/CALIPSO over a network
> > with a number of categories to produce large ip option fields with various
> > message sizes forcing fragmentation etc..
> >
> > Changes since RFC Patch:
> > Removed the NetLabel patch (was [RFC PATCH 4/5] netlabel: Add SCTP support)
> > as re-engineered. However this patchset will require the NetLabel
> > patch at [1] to fully run the SCTP selinux-testsuite.
> >
> > V1 Changes:
> > PATCH 1/4
> > Remove unused parameter from security_sctp_assoc_request().
> > Reformat and update LSM-sctp.rst documentation.
> > PATCH 2/4
> > Add variables and RCU locks as requested in [2] to support IP options.
> > PATCH 3/4
> > Added security_sctp_assoc_request() hook to sctp_sf_do_unexpected_init()
> > and sctp_sf_do_5_2_4_dupcook().
> > Removed security_sctp_assoc_request() hook from sctp_sf_do_5_1C_ack() as
> > no longer required.
> > PATCH 4/4
> > Reformat and update SELinux-sctp.rst documentation.
> > Remove bindx and connectx permissions.
> > Rework selinux_socket_connect() and selinux_netlbl_socket_connect() to
> > utilise helpers for code reuse.
> > Add spinlock to selinux_sctp_assoc_request().
> > Remove unused parameter from security_sctp_assoc_request().
> > Use address->sa_family == AF_INET in *_bind and *_connect to ensure
> > correct address type.
> > Minor cleanups.
> >
> > V2 Changes:
> > PATCH 4/4 - Remove spin lock from selinux_sctp_assoc_request()
> > PATCH 4/4 - Fix selinux_sctp_sk_clone() kbuild test robot catch [3]
> >
> > V3 Changes:
> > PATCH 2/4 - Account for IP options length in sctp.h sctp_frag_point() by
> > Marcelo
> >
> > V4 Changes:
> > PATCH 1/4 - Move specific SELinux descriptions from LSM-sctp.rst and
> > lsm_hooks.h to SELinux-sctp.rst in PATCH 4/4
> > PATCH 4/4 - Rename selinux_netlbl_sctp_socket_connect() to
> > selinux_netlbl_socket_connect_locked() and move description comments to
> > selinux_sctp_bind_connect()
> >
> > [1] https://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=151061619115945&w=2
> > [2] https://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=150962470215797&w=2
> > [3] https://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=151198281817779&w=2
> 
> SCTP folks, any objections?  I'm planning on merging these into
> selinux-next after the next merge window so if you want to see any
> changes, please speak up ...

No objections from my side.

Thanks,
Marcelo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html