From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: Qi Hou <qi.hou@windriver.com>,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v3] arm: omap2: timer: fix a kmemleak caused in omap_get_timer_dt
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:08:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180112210844.GF4821@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7dd12934-862c-c7ad-5f43-43e4c6b08199@ti.com>
* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> [180112 20:36]:
> Hi
>
> On 01/10/2018 10:54 PM, Qi Hou wrote:
> > When more than one GP timers are used as kernel system timers and the
> > corresponding nodes in device-tree are marked with the same "disabled"
> > property, then the "attr" field of the property will be initialized
> > more than once as the property being added to sys file system via
> > __of_add_property_sysfs().
> >
> > In __of_add_property_sysfs(), the "name" field of pp->attr.attr is set
> > directly to the return value of safe_name(), without taking care of
> > whether it's already a valid pointer to a memory block. If it is, its
> > old value will always be overwritten by the new one and the memory block
> > allocated before will a "ghost", then a kmemleak happened.
> >
> > That the same "disabled" property being added to different nodes of device
> > tree would cause that kind of kmemleak overhead, at leat once.
> >
> > To fix it, allocate the property dynamically, and delete static one.
>
> Does it in sync with Keerthy's work [1]
First fixes, then new stuff! Keerthy's work will have to
wait for v4.17, we want that series sitting in Linux next
for several weeks.
Regards,
Tony
> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg141100.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH, v3] arm: omap2: timer: fix a kmemleak caused in omap_get_timer_dt
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:08:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180112210844.GF4821@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7dd12934-862c-c7ad-5f43-43e4c6b08199@ti.com>
* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> [180112 20:36]:
> Hi
>
> On 01/10/2018 10:54 PM, Qi Hou wrote:
> > When more than one GP timers are used as kernel system timers and the
> > corresponding nodes in device-tree are marked with the same "disabled"
> > property, then the "attr" field of the property will be initialized
> > more than once as the property being added to sys file system via
> > __of_add_property_sysfs().
> >
> > In __of_add_property_sysfs(), the "name" field of pp->attr.attr is set
> > directly to the return value of safe_name(), without taking care of
> > whether it's already a valid pointer to a memory block. If it is, its
> > old value will always be overwritten by the new one and the memory block
> > allocated before will a "ghost", then a kmemleak happened.
> >
> > That the same "disabled" property being added to different nodes of device
> > tree would cause that kind of kmemleak overhead, at leat once.
> >
> > To fix it, allocate the property dynamically, and delete static one.
>
> Does it in sync with Keerthy's work [1]
First fixes, then new stuff! Keerthy's work will have to
wait for v4.17, we want that series sitting in Linux next
for several weeks.
Regards,
Tony
> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg141100.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-12 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-11 4:54 [PATCH, v3] arm: omap2: timer: fix a kmemleak caused in omap_get_timer_dt Qi Hou
2018-01-11 4:54 ` Qi Hou
2018-01-11 4:54 ` Qi Hou
2018-01-12 20:36 ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-01-12 20:36 ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-01-12 20:36 ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-01-12 21:08 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2018-01-12 21:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-01-12 21:17 ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-01-12 21:17 ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-01-12 21:17 ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-01-12 22:27 ` Keerthy
2018-01-12 22:27 ` Keerthy
2018-01-12 22:27 ` Keerthy
2018-02-14 16:18 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-02-14 16:18 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180112210844.GF4821@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=qi.hou@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.