All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au>
Cc: knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: ad5272: Add support for Analog Devices digital potentiometers
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 15:25:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180120152528.3b9836cf@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e5f624d-35a4-20a9-337d-8593542630f8@electromag.com.au>

On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 16:47:35 +0800
Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au> wrote:

> G'day Jonathan,
> 
> On 14/01/2018 21:39, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:17:31 +0800
> > Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au> wrote:
> >   
> >> Add implementation for Analog Devices AD5272 and AD5274 digital
> >> potentiometer devices.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au>  
> > 
> > Hi Phil,
> > 
> > A few minor comments inline, but looking pretty good.  
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> > 
> > Jonathan
> >   
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/iio/potentiometer/Kconfig  |  10 ++
> >>   drivers/iio/potentiometer/Makefile |   1 +
> >>   drivers/iio/potentiometer/ad5272.c | 219 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   3 files changed, 230 insertions(+)
> >>   create mode 100644 drivers/iio/potentiometer/ad5272.c
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/potentiometer/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/potentiometer/Kconfig
> >> index 8bf2825..0b04063 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iio/potentiometer/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/iio/potentiometer/Kconfig
> >> @@ -5,6 +5,16 @@
> >>   
> >>   menu "Digital potentiometers"
> >>   
> >> +config AD5272
> >> +	tristate "Analog Devices AD5272 Digital Potentiometer driver"
> >> +	depends on I2C
> >> +	help
> >> +	  Say yes here to build support for the Analog Devices AD5272
> >> +	  digital potentiometer chip.
> >> +
> >> +	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> >> +	  module will be called ad5272.
> >> +
> >>   config DS1803
> >>   	tristate "Maxim Integrated DS1803 Digital Potentiometer driver"
> >>   	depends on I2C
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/potentiometer/Makefile b/drivers/iio/potentiometer/Makefile
> >> index 2260d40..498bbb8 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iio/potentiometer/Makefile
> >> +++ b/drivers/iio/potentiometer/Makefile
> >> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> >>   #
> >>   
> >>   # When adding new entries keep the list in alphabetical order
> >> +obj-$(CONFIG_AD5272) += ad5272.o
> >>   obj-$(CONFIG_DS1803) += ds1803.o
> >>   obj-$(CONFIG_MAX5481) += max5481.o
> >>   obj-$(CONFIG_MAX5487) += max5487.o
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/potentiometer/ad5272.c b/drivers/iio/potentiometer/ad5272.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..b9208c2
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/iio/potentiometer/ad5272.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
> >> +/*
> >> + * Analog Devices AD5372 digital potentiometer driver
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au>
> >> + *
> >> + * Datasheet: http://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/AD5272_5274.pdf
> >> + *
> >> + * DEVID	#Wipers	#Positions	Resistor Opts (kOhm)	i2c address
> >> + * ad5272	1	1024		20, 50, 100		01011xx
> >> + * ad5274	1	256		20, 100			01011xx
> >> + *
> >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> >> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as published by
> >> + * the Free Software Foundation.  
> > 
> > Could go all SPDX with the gpl part of this.  Personally I don't mind
> > much but we'll probably end up converting it over soon anyway.
> >   
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> >> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> >> +#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> >> +#include <linux/module.h>
> >> +
> >> +#define  AD5272_RDAC_WR  1
> >> +#define  AD5272_RDAC_RD  2
> >> +#define  AD5272_CTL      7
> >> +
> >> +#define  AD5272_RDAC_WR_EN  BIT(1)
> >> +
> >> +struct ad5272_cfg {
> >> +	int max_pos;
> >> +	int kohms;
> >> +	int shift;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +enum ad5272_type {
> >> +	AD5272_020,
> >> +	AD5272_050,
> >> +	AD5272_100,
> >> +	AD5274_020,
> >> +	AD5274_100,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct ad5272_cfg ad5272_cfg[] = {
> >> +	/* on-semiconductor parts */
> >> +	[AD5272_020] = { .max_pos = 1024, .kohms = 20 },
> >> +	[AD5272_050] = { .max_pos = 1024, .kohms = 50 },
> >> +	[AD5272_100] = { .max_pos = 1024, .kohms = 100 },
> >> +	[AD5274_020] = { .max_pos = 256,  .kohms = 20,  .shift = 2 },
> >> +	[AD5274_100] = { .max_pos = 256,  .kohms = 100, .shift = 2 },
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +struct ad5272_data {
> >> +	struct i2c_client       *client;
> >> +	struct mutex            lock;
> >> +	const struct ad5272_cfg *cfg;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct iio_chan_spec ad5272_channel = {
> >> +	.type = IIO_RESISTANCE,
> >> +	.output = 1,
> >> +	.info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW),
> >> +	.info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static int ad5272_write(struct ad5272_data *data, int reg, int val)
> >> +{
> >> +	u8 buf[2];
> >> +	int ret;
> >> +
> >> +	buf[0] = ((reg & 0xf) << 2) | ((val >> 8) & 0x3);
> >> +	buf[1] = (u8)val;  
> > 
> > again, could do as buf[2]  = {...};  
> ok
> >   
> >> +
> >> +	mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> >> +	ret = i2c_master_send(data->client, buf, 2);  
> > 
> > sizeof(buf) preferred.  
> ok
> >   
> >> +	mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> >> +	return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int ad5272_read(struct ad5272_data *data, int reg, int *val)
> >> +{
> >> +	u8 buf[2];  
> > 
> > Could assign value here for compactness.
> > 	u8 buf[2] = {(reg & 0xf) << 2, 0) >
> > It's a little paranoid to mask reg given you are controlling it entirely
> > in the driver and anything of more than 4 bits is a bug anyway.  
> ok
> 
> >> +	int ret;
> >> +
> >> +	buf[0] = (reg & 0xf) << 2;
> >> +	buf[1] = 0;
> >> +
> >> +	mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> >> +	ret = i2c_master_send(data->client, buf, 2);
> >> +	if (ret < 0)
> >> +		goto error;
> >> +
> >> +	ret = i2c_master_recv(data->client, buf, 2);
> >> +	if (ret < 0)
> >> +		goto error;
> >> +
> >> +	*val = ((buf[0] & 0x3) << 8) | buf[1];
> >> +	ret = 0;
> >> +error:
> >> +	mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> >> +	return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int ad5272_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >> +			   struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> >> +			   int *val, int *val2, long mask)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct ad5272_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >> +	int ret;
> >> +
> >> +	switch (mask) {
> >> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW: {
> >> +		ret = ad5272_read(data, AD5272_RDAC_RD, val);
> >> +		*val = *val >> data->cfg->shift;
> >> +		return ret ? ret : IIO_VAL_INT;
> >> +	}
> >> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> >> +		*val = 1000 * data->cfg->kohms;
> >> +		*val2 = data->cfg->max_pos;
> >> +		return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	return -EINVAL;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int ad5272_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >> +			    struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> >> +			    int val, int val2, long mask)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct ad5272_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >> +
> >> +	if (mask != IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW)
> >> +		return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> +	if (val >= data->cfg->max_pos || val < 0)
> >> +		return -EINVAL;  
> > 
> > Also verify that val2 = 0 as otherwise the classic
> > 1.999999 evaluates to 1 rather surprises users.  
> yeap, that'd surprise me too.
> 
> >   
> >> +
> >> +	val = val << data->cfg->shift;  
> > 
> > I would role this into the next line.  
> ok
> 
> > 
> > 	return ad5272_write(data, AD5272_RDAC_WR, val << data->cfg->shift);  
> >> +
> >> +	return ad5272_write(data, AD5272_RDAC_WR, val);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static const struct iio_info ad5272_info = {
> >> +	.read_raw = ad5272_read_raw,
> >> +	.write_raw = ad5272_write_raw,
> >> +	.driver_module = THIS_MODULE,  
> > 
> > .driver_module no longer exists so just drop this.
> > We do the equivalent with some macro tricks to avoid having
> > to have this same line in every driver.  
> ok
> 
> >   
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static int ad5272_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >> +			const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> >> +	struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
> >> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> >> +	struct ad5272_data *data;
> >> +	int ret;
> >> +
> >> +	reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev, "reset",
> >> +		GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> >> +	if (IS_ERR(reset_gpio))
> >> +		return PTR_ERR(reset_gpio);
> >> +
> >> +	indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*data));
> >> +	if (!indio_dev)
> >> +		return -ENOMEM;
> >> +
> >> +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, indio_dev);
> >> +
> >> +	data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >> +	data->client = client;
> >> +	mutex_init(&data->lock);
> >> +	data->cfg = &ad5272_cfg[id->driver_data];  
> > 
> > Calling it cfg kind of implies config to me whereas this is
> > chip type specific data.  
> I just followed what seemed to be the existing convention for the iio/potentmeters.
> ds1803, mcp4531, max5481
> 
> Happy to change.
> 
> >   
> >> +
> >> +	ret = ad5272_write(data, AD5272_CTL, AD5272_RDAC_WR_EN);
> >> +	if (ret < 0)
> >> +		return -ENODEV;
> >> +
> >> +	indio_dev->dev.parent = dev;
> >> +	indio_dev->info = &ad5272_info;
> >> +	indio_dev->channels = &ad5272_channel;
> >> +	indio_dev->num_channels = 1;
> >> +	indio_dev->name = client->name;
> >> +
> >> +	return devm_iio_device_register(dev, indio_dev);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> >> +static const struct of_device_id ad5272_dt_ids[] = {
> >> +	{ .compatible = "adi,ad5272-020", .data = &ad5272_cfg[AD5272_020] },  
> > 
> > Why do this rather than stash the index in the data parameter and look up later
> > (more consistent with the i2c_device_id table below)?  
> 
> Yeah I was a bit confused by this.
> I was following how the ds1803.c driver was doing things.
> To be honest I don't have a good grasp of how .data works here or how it gets referenced or if it's
> even used...
Good point - you aren't currently using it.

This gets more interesting when i2c actually starts using the
of tables for devicetree rather than the older i2c_device_id tables.

The .data field is used for the same purpose as the indexes in
the other table, but you have to explicitly request it
with of_get_match_data

Jonathan
> 
> 
> >   
> >> +	{ .compatible = "adi,ad5272-050", .data = &ad5272_cfg[AD5272_050] },
> >> +	{ .compatible = "adi,ad5272-100", .data = &ad5272_cfg[AD5272_100] },
> >> +	{ .compatible = "adi,ad5274-020", .data = &ad5272_cfg[AD5274_020] },
> >> +	{ .compatible = "adi,ad5274-100", .data = &ad5272_cfg[AD5274_100] },
> >> +	{}
> >> +};
> >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ad5272_dt_ids);
> >> +#endif /* CONFIG_OF */
> >> +
> >> +static const struct i2c_device_id ad5272_id[] = {
> >> +	{ "ad5272-020", AD5272_020 },
> >> +	{ "ad5272-050", AD5272_050 },
> >> +	{ "ad5272-100", AD5272_100 },
> >> +	{ "ad5274-020", AD5274_020 },
> >> +	{ "ad5274-100", AD5274_100 },
> >> +	{}
> >> +};
> >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ad5272_id);
> >> +
> >> +static struct i2c_driver ad5272_driver = {
> >> +	.driver = {
> >> +		.name	= "ad5272",
> >> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ad5272_dt_ids),
> >> +	},
> >> +	.probe		= ad5272_probe,
> >> +	.id_table	= ad5272_id,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +module_i2c_driver(ad5272_driver);
> >> +
> >> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Phil Reid <preid@eletromag.com.au>");
> >> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("AD5272 digital potentiometer");
> >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");  
> > 
> > 
> >   
> 
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Phil Reid <preid-qgqNFa1JUf/o2iN0hyhwsIdd74u8MsAO@public.gmane.org>
Cc: knaack.h-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org,
	lars-Qo5EllUWu/uELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org,
	pmeerw-jW+XmwGofnusTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org,
	robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	Michael.Hennerich-OyLXuOCK7orQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: ad5272: Add support for Analog Devices digital potentiometers
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 15:25:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180120152528.3b9836cf@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e5f624d-35a4-20a9-337d-8593542630f8-qgqNFa1JUf/o2iN0hyhwsIdd74u8MsAO@public.gmane.org>

On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 16:47:35 +0800
Phil Reid <preid-qgqNFa1JUf/o2iN0hyhwsIdd74u8MsAO@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> G'day Jonathan,
> 
> On 14/01/2018 21:39, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:17:31 +0800
> > Phil Reid <preid-qgqNFa1JUf/o2iN0hyhwsIdd74u8MsAO@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >   
> >> Add implementation for Analog Devices AD5272 and AD5274 digital
> >> potentiometer devices.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Phil Reid <preid-qgqNFa1JUf/o2iN0hyhwsIdd74u8MsAO@public.gmane.org>  
> > 
> > Hi Phil,
> > 
> > A few minor comments inline, but looking pretty good.  
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> > 
> > Jonathan
> >   
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/iio/potentiometer/Kconfig  |  10 ++
> >>   drivers/iio/potentiometer/Makefile |   1 +
> >>   drivers/iio/potentiometer/ad5272.c | 219 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   3 files changed, 230 insertions(+)
> >>   create mode 100644 drivers/iio/potentiometer/ad5272.c
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/potentiometer/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/potentiometer/Kconfig
> >> index 8bf2825..0b04063 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iio/potentiometer/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/iio/potentiometer/Kconfig
> >> @@ -5,6 +5,16 @@
> >>   
> >>   menu "Digital potentiometers"
> >>   
> >> +config AD5272
> >> +	tristate "Analog Devices AD5272 Digital Potentiometer driver"
> >> +	depends on I2C
> >> +	help
> >> +	  Say yes here to build support for the Analog Devices AD5272
> >> +	  digital potentiometer chip.
> >> +
> >> +	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> >> +	  module will be called ad5272.
> >> +
> >>   config DS1803
> >>   	tristate "Maxim Integrated DS1803 Digital Potentiometer driver"
> >>   	depends on I2C
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/potentiometer/Makefile b/drivers/iio/potentiometer/Makefile
> >> index 2260d40..498bbb8 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iio/potentiometer/Makefile
> >> +++ b/drivers/iio/potentiometer/Makefile
> >> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> >>   #
> >>   
> >>   # When adding new entries keep the list in alphabetical order
> >> +obj-$(CONFIG_AD5272) += ad5272.o
> >>   obj-$(CONFIG_DS1803) += ds1803.o
> >>   obj-$(CONFIG_MAX5481) += max5481.o
> >>   obj-$(CONFIG_MAX5487) += max5487.o
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/potentiometer/ad5272.c b/drivers/iio/potentiometer/ad5272.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..b9208c2
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/iio/potentiometer/ad5272.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
> >> +/*
> >> + * Analog Devices AD5372 digital potentiometer driver
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Phil Reid <preid-qgqNFa1JUf/o2iN0hyhwsIdd74u8MsAO@public.gmane.org>
> >> + *
> >> + * Datasheet: http://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/AD5272_5274.pdf
> >> + *
> >> + * DEVID	#Wipers	#Positions	Resistor Opts (kOhm)	i2c address
> >> + * ad5272	1	1024		20, 50, 100		01011xx
> >> + * ad5274	1	256		20, 100			01011xx
> >> + *
> >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> >> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as published by
> >> + * the Free Software Foundation.  
> > 
> > Could go all SPDX with the gpl part of this.  Personally I don't mind
> > much but we'll probably end up converting it over soon anyway.
> >   
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> >> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> >> +#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> >> +#include <linux/module.h>
> >> +
> >> +#define  AD5272_RDAC_WR  1
> >> +#define  AD5272_RDAC_RD  2
> >> +#define  AD5272_CTL      7
> >> +
> >> +#define  AD5272_RDAC_WR_EN  BIT(1)
> >> +
> >> +struct ad5272_cfg {
> >> +	int max_pos;
> >> +	int kohms;
> >> +	int shift;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +enum ad5272_type {
> >> +	AD5272_020,
> >> +	AD5272_050,
> >> +	AD5272_100,
> >> +	AD5274_020,
> >> +	AD5274_100,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct ad5272_cfg ad5272_cfg[] = {
> >> +	/* on-semiconductor parts */
> >> +	[AD5272_020] = { .max_pos = 1024, .kohms = 20 },
> >> +	[AD5272_050] = { .max_pos = 1024, .kohms = 50 },
> >> +	[AD5272_100] = { .max_pos = 1024, .kohms = 100 },
> >> +	[AD5274_020] = { .max_pos = 256,  .kohms = 20,  .shift = 2 },
> >> +	[AD5274_100] = { .max_pos = 256,  .kohms = 100, .shift = 2 },
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +struct ad5272_data {
> >> +	struct i2c_client       *client;
> >> +	struct mutex            lock;
> >> +	const struct ad5272_cfg *cfg;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct iio_chan_spec ad5272_channel = {
> >> +	.type = IIO_RESISTANCE,
> >> +	.output = 1,
> >> +	.info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW),
> >> +	.info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static int ad5272_write(struct ad5272_data *data, int reg, int val)
> >> +{
> >> +	u8 buf[2];
> >> +	int ret;
> >> +
> >> +	buf[0] = ((reg & 0xf) << 2) | ((val >> 8) & 0x3);
> >> +	buf[1] = (u8)val;  
> > 
> > again, could do as buf[2]  = {...};  
> ok
> >   
> >> +
> >> +	mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> >> +	ret = i2c_master_send(data->client, buf, 2);  
> > 
> > sizeof(buf) preferred.  
> ok
> >   
> >> +	mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> >> +	return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int ad5272_read(struct ad5272_data *data, int reg, int *val)
> >> +{
> >> +	u8 buf[2];  
> > 
> > Could assign value here for compactness.
> > 	u8 buf[2] = {(reg & 0xf) << 2, 0) >
> > It's a little paranoid to mask reg given you are controlling it entirely
> > in the driver and anything of more than 4 bits is a bug anyway.  
> ok
> 
> >> +	int ret;
> >> +
> >> +	buf[0] = (reg & 0xf) << 2;
> >> +	buf[1] = 0;
> >> +
> >> +	mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> >> +	ret = i2c_master_send(data->client, buf, 2);
> >> +	if (ret < 0)
> >> +		goto error;
> >> +
> >> +	ret = i2c_master_recv(data->client, buf, 2);
> >> +	if (ret < 0)
> >> +		goto error;
> >> +
> >> +	*val = ((buf[0] & 0x3) << 8) | buf[1];
> >> +	ret = 0;
> >> +error:
> >> +	mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> >> +	return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int ad5272_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >> +			   struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> >> +			   int *val, int *val2, long mask)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct ad5272_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >> +	int ret;
> >> +
> >> +	switch (mask) {
> >> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW: {
> >> +		ret = ad5272_read(data, AD5272_RDAC_RD, val);
> >> +		*val = *val >> data->cfg->shift;
> >> +		return ret ? ret : IIO_VAL_INT;
> >> +	}
> >> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> >> +		*val = 1000 * data->cfg->kohms;
> >> +		*val2 = data->cfg->max_pos;
> >> +		return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	return -EINVAL;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int ad5272_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >> +			    struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> >> +			    int val, int val2, long mask)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct ad5272_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >> +
> >> +	if (mask != IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW)
> >> +		return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> +	if (val >= data->cfg->max_pos || val < 0)
> >> +		return -EINVAL;  
> > 
> > Also verify that val2 = 0 as otherwise the classic
> > 1.999999 evaluates to 1 rather surprises users.  
> yeap, that'd surprise me too.
> 
> >   
> >> +
> >> +	val = val << data->cfg->shift;  
> > 
> > I would role this into the next line.  
> ok
> 
> > 
> > 	return ad5272_write(data, AD5272_RDAC_WR, val << data->cfg->shift);  
> >> +
> >> +	return ad5272_write(data, AD5272_RDAC_WR, val);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static const struct iio_info ad5272_info = {
> >> +	.read_raw = ad5272_read_raw,
> >> +	.write_raw = ad5272_write_raw,
> >> +	.driver_module = THIS_MODULE,  
> > 
> > .driver_module no longer exists so just drop this.
> > We do the equivalent with some macro tricks to avoid having
> > to have this same line in every driver.  
> ok
> 
> >   
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static int ad5272_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >> +			const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> >> +	struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
> >> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> >> +	struct ad5272_data *data;
> >> +	int ret;
> >> +
> >> +	reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev, "reset",
> >> +		GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> >> +	if (IS_ERR(reset_gpio))
> >> +		return PTR_ERR(reset_gpio);
> >> +
> >> +	indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*data));
> >> +	if (!indio_dev)
> >> +		return -ENOMEM;
> >> +
> >> +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, indio_dev);
> >> +
> >> +	data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >> +	data->client = client;
> >> +	mutex_init(&data->lock);
> >> +	data->cfg = &ad5272_cfg[id->driver_data];  
> > 
> > Calling it cfg kind of implies config to me whereas this is
> > chip type specific data.  
> I just followed what seemed to be the existing convention for the iio/potentmeters.
> ds1803, mcp4531, max5481
> 
> Happy to change.
> 
> >   
> >> +
> >> +	ret = ad5272_write(data, AD5272_CTL, AD5272_RDAC_WR_EN);
> >> +	if (ret < 0)
> >> +		return -ENODEV;
> >> +
> >> +	indio_dev->dev.parent = dev;
> >> +	indio_dev->info = &ad5272_info;
> >> +	indio_dev->channels = &ad5272_channel;
> >> +	indio_dev->num_channels = 1;
> >> +	indio_dev->name = client->name;
> >> +
> >> +	return devm_iio_device_register(dev, indio_dev);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> >> +static const struct of_device_id ad5272_dt_ids[] = {
> >> +	{ .compatible = "adi,ad5272-020", .data = &ad5272_cfg[AD5272_020] },  
> > 
> > Why do this rather than stash the index in the data parameter and look up later
> > (more consistent with the i2c_device_id table below)?  
> 
> Yeah I was a bit confused by this.
> I was following how the ds1803.c driver was doing things.
> To be honest I don't have a good grasp of how .data works here or how it gets referenced or if it's
> even used...
Good point - you aren't currently using it.

This gets more interesting when i2c actually starts using the
of tables for devicetree rather than the older i2c_device_id tables.

The .data field is used for the same purpose as the indexes in
the other table, but you have to explicitly request it
with of_get_match_data

Jonathan
> 
> 
> >   
> >> +	{ .compatible = "adi,ad5272-050", .data = &ad5272_cfg[AD5272_050] },
> >> +	{ .compatible = "adi,ad5272-100", .data = &ad5272_cfg[AD5272_100] },
> >> +	{ .compatible = "adi,ad5274-020", .data = &ad5272_cfg[AD5274_020] },
> >> +	{ .compatible = "adi,ad5274-100", .data = &ad5272_cfg[AD5274_100] },
> >> +	{}
> >> +};
> >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ad5272_dt_ids);
> >> +#endif /* CONFIG_OF */
> >> +
> >> +static const struct i2c_device_id ad5272_id[] = {
> >> +	{ "ad5272-020", AD5272_020 },
> >> +	{ "ad5272-050", AD5272_050 },
> >> +	{ "ad5272-100", AD5272_100 },
> >> +	{ "ad5274-020", AD5274_020 },
> >> +	{ "ad5274-100", AD5274_100 },
> >> +	{}
> >> +};
> >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ad5272_id);
> >> +
> >> +static struct i2c_driver ad5272_driver = {
> >> +	.driver = {
> >> +		.name	= "ad5272",
> >> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ad5272_dt_ids),
> >> +	},
> >> +	.probe		= ad5272_probe,
> >> +	.id_table	= ad5272_id,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +module_i2c_driver(ad5272_driver);
> >> +
> >> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Phil Reid <preid-TeWIRZsGUAnP+dxuUfoltA@public.gmane.org>");
> >> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("AD5272 digital potentiometer");
> >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");  
> > 
> > 
> >   
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-20 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-10  6:17 [PATCH 0/2] iio: ad5272: Add support for Analog Devices digital potentiometers Phil Reid
2018-01-10  6:17 ` Phil Reid
2018-01-10  6:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: ad5272: Add bindings " Phil Reid
2018-01-10  6:17   ` Phil Reid
2018-01-10  6:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio: ad5272: Add support " Phil Reid
2018-01-10  6:17   ` Phil Reid
2018-01-11  9:00   ` Phil Reid
2018-01-11  9:00     ` Phil Reid
2018-01-14 13:41     ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-01-14 13:41       ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-01-12 10:42   ` alexandru.ardelean
2018-01-14 13:02     ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-01-15  8:37     ` Phil Reid
2018-01-14 13:39   ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-01-14 13:39     ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-01-15  8:47     ` Phil Reid
2018-01-15  8:47       ` Phil Reid
2018-01-20 15:25       ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2018-01-20 15:25         ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180120152528.3b9836cf@archlinux \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    --cc=preid@electromag.com.au \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.