From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Reduce migrations and unnecessary spreading of load to multiple CPUs
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:45:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180130104555.4125-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net> (raw)
It has been observed recently that problems with interaction between
scheduler decisions and cpufreq decisions have been unfavourable.
The scheduler decisions are biased towards reducing latency of searches
which is great on one hand but tends to spread load across an entire socket
unnecessarily. On low utilisation, this means the load on each individual CPU
is low which can be good but cpufreq decides that utilisation on individual
CPUs is too low to increase P-state and overall throughput suffers.
When a cpufreq driver is completely under the control of the OS, it
can be compensated for. For example, intel_pstate can decide to boost
apparent utilisation if a task recently slept on a CPU for idle. However,
if hardware-based cpufreq is in play (e.g. HWP) then very poor decisions
can be made and the OS cannot do much about it. This only gets worse as HWP
becomes more prevalent, sockets get larger and the p-state for individual
cores can be controlled. Just setting the performance governor is not an
answer given that plenty of people really do worry about power utilisation
and still want a reasonable balance between performance and power.
Patches 0-3 of this series reduce the number of migrations due to interrupts.
Specifically, if prev CPU and the current CPU share cache and prev
CPU is idle then use it in preference to migrating the load. The full
reasoning why is in the changelog.
Patch 4 observes that co-operating tasks, particularly between an application
and a kworker can push a load around a socket very quickly. This is
particularly true if interrupts are involved (e.g. IO completions)
and are delivered round-robin (e.g. due to MSI-X). It tracks
what CPU was used for a recent wakeup and reuses that CPU if it's
still idle when woken later. This reduces the number of cores that
are active for a workload and can have a big boost in throughput
without a hit to wakeup latency or stacking multiple tasks on one
CPU when a machine is lightly loaded.
include/linux/sched.h | 8 ++++++
kernel/sched/core.c | 1 +
kernel/sched/fair.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
--
2.15.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-01-30 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-30 10:45 Mel Gorman [this message]
2018-01-30 10:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Remove unnecessary parameters from wake_affine_idle Mel Gorman
2018-02-06 11:55 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/fair: Remove unnecessary parameters from wake_affine_idle() tip-bot for Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 10:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Restructure wake_affine to return a CPU id Mel Gorman
2018-02-06 11:56 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/fair: Restructure wake_affine*() " tip-bot for Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 10:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/fair: Do not migrate if the prev_cpu is idle Mel Gorman
2018-02-06 11:56 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 10:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Use a recently used CPU as an idle candidate and the basis for SIS Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 11:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 12:57 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 13:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 13:25 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 14:06 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-31 9:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-31 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-31 11:54 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-31 17:44 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-01 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 7:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-02-01 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 13:18 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-02 11:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-02-02 14:54 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-02 19:48 ` Mel Gorman
2018-02-02 20:01 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-05 11:10 ` Mel Gorman
2018-02-05 17:04 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-05 17:50 ` Mel Gorman
2018-02-04 8:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-02-04 8:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-02-02 11:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-02-02 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-02 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-02 14:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-03 16:30 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-05 10:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-05 10:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-02 12:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-02 13:27 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 13:15 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-01-30 13:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 13:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-01-30 11:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 12:59 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 13:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 13:18 ` Mel Gorman
2018-02-06 11:56 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180130104555.4125-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.