All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 2/6] KVM: s390: provide only a single function for setting the tod
Date: Wed,  7 Feb 2018 12:46:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180207114647.6220-3-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180207114647.6220-1-david@redhat.com>

Right now, SET CLOCK called in the guest does not properly take care of
the epoch index, as the call goes via the old kvm_s390_set_tod_clock()
interface. So the epoch index is neither reset to 0, if required, nor
properly set to e.g. 0xff on negative values.

Fix this by providing a single kvm_s390_set_tod_clock() function. Move
Multiple-epoch facility handling into it.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 46 +++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h |  5 ++---
 arch/s390/kvm/priv.c     |  9 +++++----
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index ba4c7092335a..b514ee427077 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -902,12 +902,9 @@ static int kvm_s390_set_tod_ext(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
 	if (copy_from_user(&gtod, (void __user *)attr->addr, sizeof(gtod)))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
-	if (test_kvm_facility(kvm, 139))
-		kvm_s390_set_tod_clock_ext(kvm, &gtod);
-	else if (gtod.epoch_idx == 0)
-		kvm_s390_set_tod_clock(kvm, gtod.tod);
-	else
+	if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 139) && gtod.epoch_idx)
 		return -EINVAL;
+	kvm_s390_set_tod_clock(kvm, &gtod);
 
 	VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "SET: TOD extension: 0x%x, TOD base: 0x%llx",
 		gtod.epoch_idx, gtod.tod);
@@ -932,13 +929,14 @@ static int kvm_s390_set_tod_high(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
 
 static int kvm_s390_set_tod_low(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
 {
-	u64 gtod;
+	struct kvm_s390_vm_tod_clock gtod = { 0 };
 
-	if (copy_from_user(&gtod, (void __user *)attr->addr, sizeof(gtod)))
+	if (copy_from_user(&gtod.tod, (void __user *)attr->addr,
+			   sizeof(gtod.tod)))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
-	kvm_s390_set_tod_clock(kvm, gtod);
-	VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "SET: TOD base: 0x%llx", gtod);
+	kvm_s390_set_tod_clock(kvm, &gtod);
+	VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "SET: TOD base: 0x%llx", gtod.tod);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -3021,8 +3019,8 @@ static int kvm_s390_handle_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-void kvm_s390_set_tod_clock_ext(struct kvm *kvm,
-				 const struct kvm_s390_vm_tod_clock *gtod)
+void kvm_s390_set_tod_clock(struct kvm *kvm,
+			    const struct kvm_s390_vm_tod_clock *gtod)
 {
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	struct kvm_s390_tod_clock_ext htod;
@@ -3034,10 +3032,12 @@ void kvm_s390_set_tod_clock_ext(struct kvm *kvm,
 	get_tod_clock_ext((char *)&htod);
 
 	kvm->arch.epoch = gtod->tod - htod.tod;
-	kvm->arch.epdx = gtod->epoch_idx - htod.epoch_idx;
-
-	if (kvm->arch.epoch > gtod->tod)
-		kvm->arch.epdx -= 1;
+	kvm->arch.epdx = 0;
+	if (test_kvm_facility(kvm, 139)) {
+		kvm->arch.epdx = gtod->epoch_idx - htod.epoch_idx;
+		if (kvm->arch.epoch > gtod->tod)
+			kvm->arch.epdx -= 1;
+	}
 
 	kvm_s390_vcpu_block_all(kvm);
 	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
@@ -3050,22 +3050,6 @@ void kvm_s390_set_tod_clock_ext(struct kvm *kvm,
 	mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
 }
 
-void kvm_s390_set_tod_clock(struct kvm *kvm, u64 tod)
-{
-	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
-	int i;
-
-	mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
-	preempt_disable();
-	kvm->arch.epoch = tod - get_tod_clock();
-	kvm_s390_vcpu_block_all(kvm);
-	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
-		vcpu->arch.sie_block->epoch = kvm->arch.epoch;
-	kvm_s390_vcpu_unblock_all(kvm);
-	preempt_enable();
-	mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
-}
-
 /**
  * kvm_arch_fault_in_page - fault-in guest page if necessary
  * @vcpu: The corresponding virtual cpu
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
index bd31b37b0e6f..19d719262765 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
@@ -283,9 +283,8 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_sigp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 int kvm_s390_handle_sigp_pei(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
 /* implemented in kvm-s390.c */
-void kvm_s390_set_tod_clock_ext(struct kvm *kvm,
-				 const struct kvm_s390_vm_tod_clock *gtod);
-void kvm_s390_set_tod_clock(struct kvm *kvm, u64 tod);
+void kvm_s390_set_tod_clock(struct kvm *kvm,
+			    const struct kvm_s390_vm_tod_clock *gtod);
 long kvm_arch_fault_in_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, int writable);
 int kvm_s390_store_status_unloaded(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long addr);
 int kvm_s390_vcpu_store_status(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long addr);
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
index c4c4e157c036..33505c32c48a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
@@ -85,9 +85,10 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_e3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 /* Handle SCK (SET CLOCK) interception */
 static int handle_set_clock(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
+	struct kvm_s390_vm_tod_clock gtod = { 0 };
 	int rc;
 	u8 ar;
-	u64 op2, val;
+	u64 op2;
 
 	vcpu->stat.instruction_sck++;
 
@@ -97,12 +98,12 @@ static int handle_set_clock(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	op2 = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu, &ar);
 	if (op2 & 7)	/* Operand must be on a doubleword boundary */
 		return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
-	rc = read_guest(vcpu, op2, ar, &val, sizeof(val));
+	rc = read_guest(vcpu, op2, ar, &gtod.tod, sizeof(gtod.tod));
 	if (rc)
 		return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
 
-	VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 3, "SCK: setting guest TOD to 0x%llx", val);
-	kvm_s390_set_tod_clock(vcpu->kvm, val);
+	VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 3, "SCK: setting guest TOD to 0x%llx", gtod.tod);
+	kvm_s390_set_tod_clock(vcpu->kvm, &gtod);
 
 	kvm_s390_set_psw_cc(vcpu, 0);
 	return 0;
-- 
2.14.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-07 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-07 11:46 [PATCH RFC 0/6] KVM: s390: Multiple-epoch facility fixes David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 13:47   ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-07 13:58     ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 14:06       ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-02-16  9:45   ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-03-07  3:54   ` Patch "KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2018-03-07  3:54   ` Patch "KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree gregkh
2018-02-07 11:46 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2018-02-07 20:13   ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] KVM: s390: provide only a single function for setting the tod Collin L. Walling
2018-02-07 20:15     ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-07 21:42     ` David Hildenbrand
2018-03-07  3:54   ` Patch "KVM: s390: provide only a single function for setting the tod (fix SCK)" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2018-03-07  3:54   ` Patch "KVM: s390: provide only a single function for setting the tod (fix SCK)" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree gregkh
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] KVM: s390: consider epoch index on hotplugged CPUs David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 13:09   ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-16  9:50   ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-03-07  3:54   ` Patch "KVM: s390: consider epoch index on hotplugged CPUs" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2018-03-07  3:54   ` Patch "KVM: s390: consider epoch index on hotplugged CPUs" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree gregkh
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] KVM: s390: consider epoch index on TOD clock syncs David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 20:08   ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-07 21:35     ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 22:43       ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-08 12:15         ` David Hildenbrand
2018-03-07  3:54   ` Patch "KVM: s390: consider epoch index on TOD clock syncs" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2018-03-07  3:54   ` Patch "KVM: s390: consider epoch index on TOD clock syncs" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree gregkh
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] KVM: s390: no need to inititalize kvm->arch members to 0 David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 13:25   ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] KVM: s390: generalize kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_ext() David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 14:08   ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-15 14:14     ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 14:17       ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-15 14:25         ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 11:50 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] KVM: s390: Multiple-epoch facility fixes David Hildenbrand
     [not found] <b51c6b10-c0c0-2dae-3d74-7c21820d28ce@redhat.com>
2018-02-20 19:06 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] KVM: s390: provide only a single function for setting the tod Christian Borntraeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180207114647.6220-3-david@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.