From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 5/6] KVM: s390: no need to inititalize kvm->arch members to 0
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 12:46:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180207114647.6220-6-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180207114647.6220-1-david@redhat.com>
KVM is allocated with kzalloc(), so these members are already 0.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index c2b62379049e..0c0eed7d60a8 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -1972,8 +1972,6 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
for (i = 0; i < S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_U64; i++) {
if (i < kvm_s390_fac_list_mask_size())
kvm->arch.model.fac_mask[i] &= kvm_s390_fac_list_mask[i];
- else
- kvm->arch.model.fac_mask[i] = 0UL;
}
/* Populate the facility list initially. */
@@ -1998,8 +1996,6 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
kvm_s390_crypto_init(kvm);
mutex_init(&kvm->arch.float_int.ais_lock);
- kvm->arch.float_int.simm = 0;
- kvm->arch.float_int.nimm = 0;
spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.float_int.lock);
for (i = 0; i < FIRQ_LIST_COUNT; i++)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.float_int.lists[i]);
@@ -2025,10 +2021,6 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
kvm->arch.gmap->pfault_enabled = 0;
}
- kvm->arch.css_support = 0;
- kvm->arch.use_irqchip = 0;
- kvm->arch.epoch = 0;
-
spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.start_stop_lock);
kvm_s390_vsie_init(kvm);
kvm_s390_gisa_init(kvm);
--
2.14.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-07 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-07 11:46 [PATCH RFC 0/6] KVM: s390: Multiple-epoch facility fixes David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 13:47 ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-07 13:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 14:06 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-02-16 9:45 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-03-07 3:54 ` Patch "KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2018-03-07 3:54 ` Patch "KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree gregkh
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] KVM: s390: provide only a single function for setting the tod David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 20:13 ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-07 20:15 ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-07 21:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-03-07 3:54 ` Patch "KVM: s390: provide only a single function for setting the tod (fix SCK)" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2018-03-07 3:54 ` Patch "KVM: s390: provide only a single function for setting the tod (fix SCK)" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree gregkh
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] KVM: s390: consider epoch index on hotplugged CPUs David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 13:09 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-16 9:50 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-03-07 3:54 ` Patch "KVM: s390: consider epoch index on hotplugged CPUs" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2018-03-07 3:54 ` Patch "KVM: s390: consider epoch index on hotplugged CPUs" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree gregkh
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] KVM: s390: consider epoch index on TOD clock syncs David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 20:08 ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-07 21:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 22:43 ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-08 12:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-03-07 3:54 ` Patch "KVM: s390: consider epoch index on TOD clock syncs" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2018-03-07 3:54 ` Patch "KVM: s390: consider epoch index on TOD clock syncs" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree gregkh
2018-02-07 11:46 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2018-02-15 13:25 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] KVM: s390: no need to inititalize kvm->arch members to 0 Cornelia Huck
2018-02-07 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] KVM: s390: generalize kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_ext() David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 14:08 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-15 14:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-15 14:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-15 14:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-07 11:50 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] KVM: s390: Multiple-epoch facility fixes David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180207114647.6220-6-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.