All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blk-mq: Fix race between resetting the timer and completion handling
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 12:09:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180207200951.GE695913@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1518030233.2870.57.camel@wdc.com>

Hello,

On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 07:03:56PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> I tried the above patch but already during the first iteration of the test I
> noticed that the test hung, probably due to the following request that got stuck:
> 
> $ (cd /sys/kernel/debug/block && grep -aH . */*/*/rq_list)
> 00000000a98cff60 {.op=SCSI_IN, .cmd_flags=, .rq_flags=MQ_INFLIGHT|PREEMPT|QUIET|IO_STAT|PM,
>  .state=idle, .tag=22, .internal_tag=-1, .cmd=Synchronize Cache(10) 35 00 00 00 00 00, .retries=0,
>  .result = 0x0, .flags=TAGGED, .timeout=60.000, allocated 872.690 s ago}

I'm wonder how this happened, so we can lose a completion when it
races against BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER; however, the command should timeout
later cuz the timer is running again now.  Maybe we actually had the
memory barrier race that you pointed out in the other message?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-07 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-07  1:11 [PATCH v2] blk-mq: Fix race between resetting the timer and completion handling Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 17:06 ` Tejun Heo
2018-02-07 17:27   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 17:35     ` tj
2018-02-07 18:14       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 20:07         ` tj
2018-02-07 23:48           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08  1:09             ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 15:39               ` tj
2018-02-08 15:40                 ` tj
2018-02-08 16:31                 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 17:00                   ` tj
2018-02-08 17:10                     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 17:19                       ` tj
2018-02-08 17:37                         ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 17:40                           ` tj
2018-02-08 17:48                             ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 17:54                               ` tj
2018-02-13 21:20                   ` tj
2018-02-14 16:58                     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-18 13:11                       ` tj
2018-02-21 18:53                         ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-21 19:21                           ` tj
2018-02-21 22:55                             ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 19:03   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 20:09     ` tj [this message]
2018-02-07 21:02       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07 21:40         ` tj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180207200951.GE695913@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.