From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v6] tests/perf_pmu: Verify engine busyness accuracy
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:34:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180215153453.657-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151869859558.11261.17638690172075680562@mail.alporthouse.com>
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
A subtest to verify that the engine busyness is reported with expected
accuracy on platforms where the feature is available.
We test three patterns: 2%, 50% and 98% load per engine.
v2:
* Use spin batch instead of nop calibration.
* Various tweaks.
v3:
* Change loops to be time based.
* Use __igt_spin_batch_new inside timing sensitive loops.
* Fixed PWM sleep handling.
v4:
* Use restarting spin batch.
* Calibrate more carefully by looking at the real PWM loop.
v5:
* Made standalone.
* Better info messages.
* Tweak sleep compensation.
v6:
* Some final tweaks. (Chris Wilson)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
tests/perf_pmu.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 181 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
index 7d9c42d16a08..82053416cbea 100644
--- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
#include <dirent.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <poll.h>
+#include <sched.h>
#include "igt.h"
#include "igt_core.h"
@@ -385,6 +386,22 @@ busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd);
}
+static void
+__submit_spin_batch(int gem_fd, igt_spin_t *spin,
+ const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj = {
+ .handle = spin->handle
+ };
+ struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb = {
+ .buffer_count = 1,
+ .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj),
+ .flags = e2ring(gem_fd, e),
+ };
+
+ gem_execbuf(gem_fd, &eb);
+}
+
static void
most_busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
const unsigned int num_engines, unsigned int flags)
@@ -405,15 +422,7 @@ most_busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
if (e == e_) {
idle_idx = i;
} else if (spin) {
- struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj = {
- .handle = spin->handle
- };
- struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb = {
- .buffer_count = 1,
- .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj),
- .flags = e2ring(gem_fd, e_),
- };
- gem_execbuf(gem_fd, &eb);
+ __submit_spin_batch(gem_fd, spin, e_);
} else {
spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0,
e2ring(gem_fd, e_), 0);
@@ -469,15 +478,7 @@ all_busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const unsigned int num_engines,
continue;
if (spin) {
- struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj = {
- .handle = spin->handle
- };
- struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb = {
- .buffer_count = 1,
- .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj),
- .flags = e2ring(gem_fd, e),
- };
- gem_execbuf(gem_fd, &eb);
+ __submit_spin_batch(gem_fd, spin, e);
} else {
spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0,
e2ring(gem_fd, e), 0);
@@ -1392,6 +1393,157 @@ test_enable_race(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd);
}
+static double __error(double val, double ref)
+{
+ igt_assert(ref > 1e-5 /* smallval */);
+ return (100.0 * val / ref) - 100.0;
+}
+
+static void __rearm_spin_batch(igt_spin_t *spin)
+{
+ const uint32_t mi_arb_chk = 0x5 << 23;
+
+ *spin->batch = mi_arb_chk;
+ __sync_synchronize();
+}
+
+#define div_round_up(a, b) (((a) + (b) - 1) / (b))
+
+static void
+accuracy(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
+ unsigned long target_busy_pct)
+{
+ const unsigned int min_test_loops = 7;
+ const unsigned long min_test_us = 1e6;
+ unsigned long busy_us = 2500;
+ unsigned long idle_us = 100 * (busy_us - target_busy_pct *
+ busy_us / 100) / target_busy_pct;
+ unsigned long pwm_calibration_us;
+ unsigned long test_us;
+ double busy_r;
+ uint64_t val[2];
+ uint64_t ts[2];
+ int fd;
+
+ /* Sampling platforms cannot reach the high accuracy criteria. */
+ igt_require(gem_has_execlists(gem_fd));
+
+ while (idle_us < 2500) {
+ busy_us *= 2;
+ idle_us *= 2;
+ }
+
+ pwm_calibration_us = min_test_loops * (busy_us + idle_us);
+ while (pwm_calibration_us < min_test_us)
+ pwm_calibration_us += busy_us + idle_us;
+ test_us = min_test_loops * (idle_us + busy_us);
+ while (test_us < min_test_us)
+ test_us += busy_us + idle_us;
+
+ igt_info("calibration=%luus, test=%luus; ratio=%.2f%% (%luus/%luus)\n",
+ pwm_calibration_us, test_us,
+ (double)busy_us / (busy_us + idle_us) * 100.0,
+ busy_us, idle_us);
+
+ assert_within_epsilon((double)busy_us / (busy_us + idle_us),
+ (double)target_busy_pct / 100.0, tolerance);
+
+ /* Emit PWM pattern on the engine from a child. */
+ igt_fork(child, 1) {
+ struct sched_param rt = { .sched_priority = 99 };
+ const unsigned long timeout[] = { pwm_calibration_us * 1000,
+ test_us * 2 * 1000 };
+ unsigned long sleep_busy = busy_us;
+ unsigned long sleep_idle = idle_us;
+ igt_spin_t *spin;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* We need the best sleep accuracy we can get. */
+ ret = sched_setscheduler(0,
+ SCHED_FIFO | SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK,
+ &rt);
+ if (ret)
+ igt_warn("Failed to set scheduling policy!\n");
+
+ /* Allocate our spin batch and idle it. */
+ spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0, e2ring(gem_fd, e), 0);
+ igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
+ gem_sync(gem_fd, spin->handle);
+
+ /* 1st pass is calibration, second pass is the test. */
+ for (int pass = 0; pass < ARRAY_SIZE(timeout); pass++) {
+ unsigned long busy_ns = 0, idle_ns = 0;
+ struct timespec test_start = { };
+ unsigned long loops = 0;
+ double err_busy, err_idle;
+
+ igt_nsec_elapsed(&test_start);
+ do {
+ struct timespec t_busy = { };
+
+ igt_nsec_elapsed(&t_busy);
+
+ /* Restart the spinbatch. */
+ __rearm_spin_batch(spin);
+ __submit_spin_batch(gem_fd, spin, e);
+ measured_usleep(sleep_busy);
+ igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
+ gem_sync(gem_fd, spin->handle);
+
+ busy_ns += igt_nsec_elapsed(&t_busy);
+
+ idle_ns += measured_usleep(sleep_idle);
+
+ loops++;
+ } while (igt_nsec_elapsed(&test_start) < timeout[pass]);
+
+ busy_ns = div_round_up(busy_ns, loops);
+ idle_ns = div_round_up(idle_ns, loops);
+
+ err_busy = __error(busy_ns / 1000, busy_us);
+ err_idle = __error(idle_ns / 1000, idle_us);
+
+ igt_info("%u: busy %lu/%lu %.2f%%, idle %lu/%lu %.2f%%\n",
+ pass,
+ busy_ns / 1000, busy_us, err_busy,
+ idle_ns / 1000, idle_us, err_idle);
+
+ if (pass == 0) {
+ sleep_busy = (double)busy_us -
+ (double)busy_us * err_busy / 100.0;
+ sleep_idle = (double)idle_us -
+ (double)idle_us * err_idle / 100.0;
+ igt_info("calibrated sleeps ratio %.2f%% (%lu/%lu)\n",
+ (double)sleep_busy /
+ (sleep_busy + sleep_idle) * 100.0,
+ sleep_busy, sleep_idle);
+ }
+ }
+
+ igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
+ }
+
+ /* Let the child run. */
+ usleep(pwm_calibration_us * 2);
+
+ /* Collect engine busyness for an interesting part of child runtime. */
+ fd = open_pmu(I915_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY(e->class, e->instance));
+ val[0] = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[0]);
+ usleep(test_us / 2);
+ val[1] = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[1]);
+ close(fd);
+
+ igt_waitchildren();
+
+ busy_r = (double)(val[1] - val[0]) / (ts[1] - ts[0]);
+
+ igt_info("error=%.2f%% (%.2f%% vs %lu%%)\n",
+ __error(busy_r, target_busy_pct / 100.0),
+ busy_r * 100.0, target_busy_pct);
+
+ assert_within_epsilon(busy_r, (double)target_busy_pct / 100.0, 0.15);
+}
+
igt_main
{
const unsigned int num_other_metrics =
@@ -1420,6 +1572,8 @@ igt_main
invalid_init();
for_each_engine_class_instance(fd, e) {
+ const unsigned int pct[] = { 2, 50, 98 };
+
/**
* Test that a single engine metric can be initialized or it
* is correctly rejected.
@@ -1526,6 +1680,15 @@ igt_main
*/
igt_subtest_f("enable-race-%s", e->name)
test_enable_race(fd, e);
+
+ /**
+ * Check engine busyness accuracy is as expected.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pct); i++) {
+ igt_subtest_f("busy-accuracy-%u-%s",
+ pct[i], e->name)
+ accuracy(fd, e, pct[i]);
+ }
}
/**
--
2.14.1
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH i-g-t v6] tests/perf_pmu: Verify engine busyness accuracy
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:34:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180215153453.657-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151869859558.11261.17638690172075680562@mail.alporthouse.com>
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
A subtest to verify that the engine busyness is reported with expected
accuracy on platforms where the feature is available.
We test three patterns: 2%, 50% and 98% load per engine.
v2:
* Use spin batch instead of nop calibration.
* Various tweaks.
v3:
* Change loops to be time based.
* Use __igt_spin_batch_new inside timing sensitive loops.
* Fixed PWM sleep handling.
v4:
* Use restarting spin batch.
* Calibrate more carefully by looking at the real PWM loop.
v5:
* Made standalone.
* Better info messages.
* Tweak sleep compensation.
v6:
* Some final tweaks. (Chris Wilson)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
tests/perf_pmu.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 181 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
index 7d9c42d16a08..82053416cbea 100644
--- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
#include <dirent.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <poll.h>
+#include <sched.h>
#include "igt.h"
#include "igt_core.h"
@@ -385,6 +386,22 @@ busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd);
}
+static void
+__submit_spin_batch(int gem_fd, igt_spin_t *spin,
+ const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj = {
+ .handle = spin->handle
+ };
+ struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb = {
+ .buffer_count = 1,
+ .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj),
+ .flags = e2ring(gem_fd, e),
+ };
+
+ gem_execbuf(gem_fd, &eb);
+}
+
static void
most_busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
const unsigned int num_engines, unsigned int flags)
@@ -405,15 +422,7 @@ most_busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
if (e == e_) {
idle_idx = i;
} else if (spin) {
- struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj = {
- .handle = spin->handle
- };
- struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb = {
- .buffer_count = 1,
- .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj),
- .flags = e2ring(gem_fd, e_),
- };
- gem_execbuf(gem_fd, &eb);
+ __submit_spin_batch(gem_fd, spin, e_);
} else {
spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0,
e2ring(gem_fd, e_), 0);
@@ -469,15 +478,7 @@ all_busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const unsigned int num_engines,
continue;
if (spin) {
- struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj = {
- .handle = spin->handle
- };
- struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb = {
- .buffer_count = 1,
- .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj),
- .flags = e2ring(gem_fd, e),
- };
- gem_execbuf(gem_fd, &eb);
+ __submit_spin_batch(gem_fd, spin, e);
} else {
spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0,
e2ring(gem_fd, e), 0);
@@ -1392,6 +1393,157 @@ test_enable_race(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd);
}
+static double __error(double val, double ref)
+{
+ igt_assert(ref > 1e-5 /* smallval */);
+ return (100.0 * val / ref) - 100.0;
+}
+
+static void __rearm_spin_batch(igt_spin_t *spin)
+{
+ const uint32_t mi_arb_chk = 0x5 << 23;
+
+ *spin->batch = mi_arb_chk;
+ __sync_synchronize();
+}
+
+#define div_round_up(a, b) (((a) + (b) - 1) / (b))
+
+static void
+accuracy(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
+ unsigned long target_busy_pct)
+{
+ const unsigned int min_test_loops = 7;
+ const unsigned long min_test_us = 1e6;
+ unsigned long busy_us = 2500;
+ unsigned long idle_us = 100 * (busy_us - target_busy_pct *
+ busy_us / 100) / target_busy_pct;
+ unsigned long pwm_calibration_us;
+ unsigned long test_us;
+ double busy_r;
+ uint64_t val[2];
+ uint64_t ts[2];
+ int fd;
+
+ /* Sampling platforms cannot reach the high accuracy criteria. */
+ igt_require(gem_has_execlists(gem_fd));
+
+ while (idle_us < 2500) {
+ busy_us *= 2;
+ idle_us *= 2;
+ }
+
+ pwm_calibration_us = min_test_loops * (busy_us + idle_us);
+ while (pwm_calibration_us < min_test_us)
+ pwm_calibration_us += busy_us + idle_us;
+ test_us = min_test_loops * (idle_us + busy_us);
+ while (test_us < min_test_us)
+ test_us += busy_us + idle_us;
+
+ igt_info("calibration=%luus, test=%luus; ratio=%.2f%% (%luus/%luus)\n",
+ pwm_calibration_us, test_us,
+ (double)busy_us / (busy_us + idle_us) * 100.0,
+ busy_us, idle_us);
+
+ assert_within_epsilon((double)busy_us / (busy_us + idle_us),
+ (double)target_busy_pct / 100.0, tolerance);
+
+ /* Emit PWM pattern on the engine from a child. */
+ igt_fork(child, 1) {
+ struct sched_param rt = { .sched_priority = 99 };
+ const unsigned long timeout[] = { pwm_calibration_us * 1000,
+ test_us * 2 * 1000 };
+ unsigned long sleep_busy = busy_us;
+ unsigned long sleep_idle = idle_us;
+ igt_spin_t *spin;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* We need the best sleep accuracy we can get. */
+ ret = sched_setscheduler(0,
+ SCHED_FIFO | SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK,
+ &rt);
+ if (ret)
+ igt_warn("Failed to set scheduling policy!\n");
+
+ /* Allocate our spin batch and idle it. */
+ spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0, e2ring(gem_fd, e), 0);
+ igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
+ gem_sync(gem_fd, spin->handle);
+
+ /* 1st pass is calibration, second pass is the test. */
+ for (int pass = 0; pass < ARRAY_SIZE(timeout); pass++) {
+ unsigned long busy_ns = 0, idle_ns = 0;
+ struct timespec test_start = { };
+ unsigned long loops = 0;
+ double err_busy, err_idle;
+
+ igt_nsec_elapsed(&test_start);
+ do {
+ struct timespec t_busy = { };
+
+ igt_nsec_elapsed(&t_busy);
+
+ /* Restart the spinbatch. */
+ __rearm_spin_batch(spin);
+ __submit_spin_batch(gem_fd, spin, e);
+ measured_usleep(sleep_busy);
+ igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
+ gem_sync(gem_fd, spin->handle);
+
+ busy_ns += igt_nsec_elapsed(&t_busy);
+
+ idle_ns += measured_usleep(sleep_idle);
+
+ loops++;
+ } while (igt_nsec_elapsed(&test_start) < timeout[pass]);
+
+ busy_ns = div_round_up(busy_ns, loops);
+ idle_ns = div_round_up(idle_ns, loops);
+
+ err_busy = __error(busy_ns / 1000, busy_us);
+ err_idle = __error(idle_ns / 1000, idle_us);
+
+ igt_info("%u: busy %lu/%lu %.2f%%, idle %lu/%lu %.2f%%\n",
+ pass,
+ busy_ns / 1000, busy_us, err_busy,
+ idle_ns / 1000, idle_us, err_idle);
+
+ if (pass == 0) {
+ sleep_busy = (double)busy_us -
+ (double)busy_us * err_busy / 100.0;
+ sleep_idle = (double)idle_us -
+ (double)idle_us * err_idle / 100.0;
+ igt_info("calibrated sleeps ratio %.2f%% (%lu/%lu)\n",
+ (double)sleep_busy /
+ (sleep_busy + sleep_idle) * 100.0,
+ sleep_busy, sleep_idle);
+ }
+ }
+
+ igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
+ }
+
+ /* Let the child run. */
+ usleep(pwm_calibration_us * 2);
+
+ /* Collect engine busyness for an interesting part of child runtime. */
+ fd = open_pmu(I915_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY(e->class, e->instance));
+ val[0] = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[0]);
+ usleep(test_us / 2);
+ val[1] = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[1]);
+ close(fd);
+
+ igt_waitchildren();
+
+ busy_r = (double)(val[1] - val[0]) / (ts[1] - ts[0]);
+
+ igt_info("error=%.2f%% (%.2f%% vs %lu%%)\n",
+ __error(busy_r, target_busy_pct / 100.0),
+ busy_r * 100.0, target_busy_pct);
+
+ assert_within_epsilon(busy_r, (double)target_busy_pct / 100.0, 0.15);
+}
+
igt_main
{
const unsigned int num_other_metrics =
@@ -1420,6 +1572,8 @@ igt_main
invalid_init();
for_each_engine_class_instance(fd, e) {
+ const unsigned int pct[] = { 2, 50, 98 };
+
/**
* Test that a single engine metric can be initialized or it
* is correctly rejected.
@@ -1526,6 +1680,15 @@ igt_main
*/
igt_subtest_f("enable-race-%s", e->name)
test_enable_race(fd, e);
+
+ /**
+ * Check engine busyness accuracy is as expected.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pct); i++) {
+ igt_subtest_f("busy-accuracy-%u-%s",
+ pct[i], e->name)
+ accuracy(fd, e, pct[i]);
+ }
}
/**
--
2.14.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-15 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-15 11:53 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/perf_pmu: Verify engine busyness accuracy Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-15 11:53 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-15 12:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-02-15 12:43 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-15 15:34 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2018-02-15 15:34 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-17 11:36 ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
2018-02-17 11:36 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-19 9:19 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-19 9:19 ` [igt-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-19 9:27 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-02-19 9:27 ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
2018-02-19 9:57 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-19 9:57 ` [igt-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-19 10:26 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-02-19 10:26 ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
2018-02-19 10:58 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-19 10:58 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-19 11:04 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-02-19 11:04 ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
2018-02-15 15:07 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for tests/perf_pmu: Verify engine busyness accuracy (rev2) Patchwork
2018-02-15 17:20 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for tests/perf_pmu: Verify engine busyness accuracy (rev3) Patchwork
2018-02-16 12:50 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2018-02-16 13:27 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-02-16 15:37 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180215153453.657-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--to=tursulin@ursulin.net \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.