From: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Revert "spl: eMMC/SD: Provide one __weak spl_boot_mode() function"
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:58:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180215155849.362fa7b6@jawa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180215144403.GJ10592@bill-the-cat>
Hi Tom,
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 03:33:29PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Hi Fabio,
> >
> > > This reverts commit d695d6627803dbb78a226e04b0436a01633a9936.
> > >
> > > Commit d695d6627803 ("spl: eMMC/SD: Provide one __weak
> > > spl_boot_mode() function") breaks the boot on several i.MX6
> > > boards, such as cuboxi and wandboard:
> > >
> > > U-Boot SPL 2018.03-rc1-00212-g48914fc119 (Feb 10 2018 - 11:04:33
> > > +1300) Trying to boot from MMC1
> > > Failed to mount ext2 filesystem...
> > > spl_load_image_ext: ext4fs mount err - 0
> > >
> > > Revert it so that we can boot U-Boot again.
> >
> > This is IMHO throwing the baby with the batch....
>
> I kind of feel we need to revert this too, sorry. I'm also worried
> that we've broken some of the other platforms that also have funky
> if-else expected logic, and we'll be at the point soon where we have
> enough platforms that need to override the spl_boot_mode func with
> what they had before that it's not a huge win.
>
Just my 2 cents.
1. IMHO 2 months release cycle is too short, regarding the peace of
development; we move Kconfig, perform DM conversion, and deal with
legacy code
2. As we removed the obsolete / not maitained archs. We also need to
scrutinize the "core" u-boot code (which is often 10+ years old).
As this patch showed - spotting some "implicit" errors - which cannot be
found with travis CI build tests consumes some time.
What is even more strange - this code from the very beginnig was
developmed on iMX6 board ....
We JUST need MORE time to stabilize thing......
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20180215/d68db4a3/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-15 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-15 12:14 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Revert "spl: eMMC/SD: Provide one __weak spl_boot_mode() function" Fabio Estevam
2018-02-15 14:18 ` Stefano Babic
2018-02-15 14:41 ` Lukasz Majewski
2018-02-15 14:33 ` Lukasz Majewski
2018-02-15 14:43 ` Fabio Estevam
2018-02-15 14:44 ` Tom Rini
2018-02-15 14:50 ` Marek Vasut
2018-02-15 14:58 ` Lukasz Majewski [this message]
2018-02-15 15:01 ` Fabio Estevam
2018-02-15 17:09 ` Stefano Babic
2018-02-15 17:43 ` Marek Vasut
2018-02-20 22:48 ` Fabio Estevam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180215155849.362fa7b6@jawa \
--to=lukma@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.