All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>
Cc: sre@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	wens@csie.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, maxime.ripard@bootlin.com,
	knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net,
	lee.jones@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/13] iio: adc: axp20x_adc: remove !! in favor of ternary condition
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 12:20:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180224122029.1520fe89@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ec180ff4358ac6e163115aa7832a0674b6a640e.1519044068.git-series.quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>

On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:47:36 +0100
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@bootlin.com> wrote:

> !!'s behaviour isn't that obvious and sparse complained about it, so
> let's replace it with a ternary condition.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
for the autobuilders to play with it.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c
> index a30a972..7a745cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c
> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int axp20x_adc_offset_voltage(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int channel,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	*val = !!(*val) * 700000;
> +	*val = *val ? 700000 : 0;
>  
>  	return IIO_VAL_INT;
>  }
> @@ -442,15 +442,17 @@ static int axp20x_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  	if (val != 0 && val != 700000)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	val = val ? 1 : 0;
> +
>  	switch (chan->channel) {
>  	case AXP20X_GPIO0_V:
>  		reg = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO0;
> -		regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO0_VAL(!!val);
> +		regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO0_VAL(val);
>  		break;
>  
>  	case AXP20X_GPIO1_V:
>  		reg = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO1;
> -		regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO1_VAL(!!val);
> +		regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO1_VAL(val);
>  		break;
>  
>  	default:


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	lars@metafoo.de, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, maxime.ripard@bootlin.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,
	sre@kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	wens@csie.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, pmeerw@pmeerw.net,
	knaack.h@gmx.de, lee.jones@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/13] iio: adc: axp20x_adc: remove !! in favor of ternary condition
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 12:20:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180224122029.1520fe89@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ec180ff4358ac6e163115aa7832a0674b6a640e.1519044068.git-series.quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>

On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:47:36 +0100
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@bootlin.com> wrote:

> !!'s behaviour isn't that obvious and sparse complained about it, so
> let's replace it with a ternary condition.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
for the autobuilders to play with it.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c
> index a30a972..7a745cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c
> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int axp20x_adc_offset_voltage(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int channel,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	*val = !!(*val) * 700000;
> +	*val = *val ? 700000 : 0;
>  
>  	return IIO_VAL_INT;
>  }
> @@ -442,15 +442,17 @@ static int axp20x_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  	if (val != 0 && val != 700000)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	val = val ? 1 : 0;
> +
>  	switch (chan->channel) {
>  	case AXP20X_GPIO0_V:
>  		reg = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO0;
> -		regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO0_VAL(!!val);
> +		regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO0_VAL(val);
>  		break;
>  
>  	case AXP20X_GPIO1_V:
>  		reg = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO1;
> -		regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO1_VAL(!!val);
> +		regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO1_VAL(val);
>  		break;
>  
>  	default:

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jic23@kernel.org (Jonathan Cameron)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 13/13] iio: adc: axp20x_adc: remove !! in favor of ternary condition
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 12:20:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180224122029.1520fe89@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ec180ff4358ac6e163115aa7832a0674b6a640e.1519044068.git-series.quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>

On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:47:36 +0100
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@bootlin.com> wrote:

> !!'s behaviour isn't that obvious and sparse complained about it, so
> let's replace it with a ternary condition.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
for the autobuilders to play with it.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c
> index a30a972..7a745cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c
> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int axp20x_adc_offset_voltage(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int channel,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	*val = !!(*val) * 700000;
> +	*val = *val ? 700000 : 0;
>  
>  	return IIO_VAL_INT;
>  }
> @@ -442,15 +442,17 @@ static int axp20x_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  	if (val != 0 && val != 700000)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	val = val ? 1 : 0;
> +
>  	switch (chan->channel) {
>  	case AXP20X_GPIO0_V:
>  		reg = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO0;
> -		regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO0_VAL(!!val);
> +		regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO0_VAL(val);
>  		break;
>  
>  	case AXP20X_GPIO1_V:
>  		reg = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO1;
> -		regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO1_VAL(!!val);
> +		regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO1_VAL(val);
>  		break;
>  
>  	default:

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-24 12:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-19 12:47 [PATCH v4 00/13] add support for AXP813 ADC and battery power supply Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47 ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47 ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] ARM: dtsi: axp209: add node for ADC Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] ARM: dtsi: axp22x: " Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] mfd: axp20x: make AXP209/22x cells probe their ADC via DT Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] ARM: dtsi: axp81x: add node for ADC Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] mfd: axp20x: probe axp20x_adc driver for AXP813 Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] power: supply: axp20x_battery: use data struct for variant specific code Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-20  9:12   ` [RFC PATCH] power: supply: axp20x_battery: axp209_data can be static kbuild test robot
2018-02-20  9:12     ` kbuild test robot
2018-02-20  9:12     ` kbuild test robot
2018-02-20  9:12   ` [PATCH v4 06/13] power: supply: axp20x_battery: use data struct for variant specific code kbuild test robot
2018-02-20  9:12     ` kbuild test robot
2018-02-20  9:12     ` kbuild test robot
2018-02-19 12:47 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] dt-bindings: power: supply: axp20x: add AXP813 battery DT binding Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] power: supply: axp20x_battery: add support for AXP813 Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] mfd: axp20x: add battery power supply cell " Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] ARM: dtsi: axp81x: add battery power supply subnode Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] ARM: dtsi: sun8i: a711: enable " Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] ARM: dtsi: axp81x: remove IP name from DT node name Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] iio: adc: axp20x_adc: remove !! in favor of ternary condition Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-19 12:47   ` Quentin Schulz
2018-02-24 12:20   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2018-02-24 12:20     ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-02-24 12:20     ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-02-21  9:51 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] add support for AXP813 ADC and battery power supply Maxime Ripard
2018-02-21  9:51   ` Maxime Ripard
2018-02-21  9:51   ` Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180224122029.1520fe89@archlinux \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    --cc=quentin.schulz@bootlin.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sre@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.