From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v4] tpm: cmd_ready command can be issued only after granting locality
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 11:40:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180225094045.4zkqbrt5yi3ao562@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180224154316.26607-1-tomas.winkler@intel.com>
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 05:43:16PM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> The correct sequence is to first request locality and only after
> that perform cmd_ready handshake, otherwise the hardware will drop
> the subsequent message as from the device point of view the cmd_ready
> handshake wasn't performed. Symmetrically locality has to be relinquished
> only after going idle handshake has completed, this requires that
> go_idle has to poll for the completion and as well locality
> relinquish has to poll for completion so it is not overridden
> in back to back commands flow.
>
> The issue is only visible on devices that support multiple localities.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> V2: poll for locality relinquish completion
> V3: 1. Print error message upon locality relinquish failure
> 2. Don't override rc code on error path with locality relinquish
> V4: 3. Don't capture locality relinquish error code in rc, just print
> the error message.
>
> return value.
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 20 +++++---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 4 +-
> include/linux/tpm.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> index 9e80a953d693..4d74bacca5a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> @@ -422,8 +422,6 @@ ssize_t tpm_transmit(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm_space *space,
> if (!(flags & TPM_TRANSMIT_UNLOCKED))
> mutex_lock(&chip->tpm_mutex);
>
> - if (chip->dev.parent)
> - pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->dev.parent);
>
> if (chip->ops->clk_enable != NULL)
> chip->ops->clk_enable(chip, true);
> @@ -439,6 +437,9 @@ ssize_t tpm_transmit(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm_space *space,
> chip->locality = rc;
> }
>
> + if (chip->dev.parent)
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->dev.parent);
> +
> rc = tpm2_prepare_space(chip, space, ordinal, buf);
> if (rc)
> goto out;
> @@ -499,17 +500,24 @@ ssize_t tpm_transmit(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm_space *space,
> rc = tpm2_commit_space(chip, space, ordinal, buf, &len);
>
> out:
> + if (chip->dev.parent)
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(chip->dev.parent);
> +
> if (need_locality && chip->ops->relinquish_locality) {
> - chip->ops->relinquish_locality(chip, chip->locality);
> + /* this coud be on error path, don't override error code */
> + int l_rc = chip->ops->relinquish_locality(chip, chip->locality);
Declaration should be in the beginning of the function.
> +
> + if (l_rc) {
> + dev_err(&chip->dev, "%s: relinquish_locality: error %d\n",
> + __func__, l_rc);
> + }
In kernel coding style, this should be w/o curly braces.
I can fix these cosmetic issues
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Doesn't this need
Fixes: 877c57d0d0ca ("tpm_crb: request and relinquish locality 0")
And shouldn't this also have
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
?
/Jarkko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com (Jarkko Sakkinen)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2 v4] tpm: cmd_ready command can be issued only after granting locality
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 11:40:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180225094045.4zkqbrt5yi3ao562@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180224154316.26607-1-tomas.winkler@intel.com>
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 05:43:16PM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> The correct sequence is to first request locality and only after
> that perform cmd_ready handshake, otherwise the hardware will drop
> the subsequent message as from the device point of view the cmd_ready
> handshake wasn't performed. Symmetrically locality has to be relinquished
> only after going idle handshake has completed, this requires that
> go_idle has to poll for the completion and as well locality
> relinquish has to poll for completion so it is not overridden
> in back to back commands flow.
>
> The issue is only visible on devices that support multiple localities.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> V2: poll for locality relinquish completion
> V3: 1. Print error message upon locality relinquish failure
> 2. Don't override rc code on error path with locality relinquish
> V4: 3. Don't capture locality relinquish error code in rc, just print
> the error message.
>
> return value.
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 20 +++++---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 4 +-
> include/linux/tpm.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> index 9e80a953d693..4d74bacca5a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> @@ -422,8 +422,6 @@ ssize_t tpm_transmit(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm_space *space,
> if (!(flags & TPM_TRANSMIT_UNLOCKED))
> mutex_lock(&chip->tpm_mutex);
>
> - if (chip->dev.parent)
> - pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->dev.parent);
>
> if (chip->ops->clk_enable != NULL)
> chip->ops->clk_enable(chip, true);
> @@ -439,6 +437,9 @@ ssize_t tpm_transmit(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm_space *space,
> chip->locality = rc;
> }
>
> + if (chip->dev.parent)
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->dev.parent);
> +
> rc = tpm2_prepare_space(chip, space, ordinal, buf);
> if (rc)
> goto out;
> @@ -499,17 +500,24 @@ ssize_t tpm_transmit(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm_space *space,
> rc = tpm2_commit_space(chip, space, ordinal, buf, &len);
>
> out:
> + if (chip->dev.parent)
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(chip->dev.parent);
> +
> if (need_locality && chip->ops->relinquish_locality) {
> - chip->ops->relinquish_locality(chip, chip->locality);
> + /* this coud be on error path, don't override error code */
> + int l_rc = chip->ops->relinquish_locality(chip, chip->locality);
Declaration should be in the beginning of the function.
> +
> + if (l_rc) {
> + dev_err(&chip->dev, "%s: relinquish_locality: error %d\n",
> + __func__, l_rc);
> + }
In kernel coding style, this should be w/o curly braces.
I can fix these cosmetic issues
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Doesn't this need
Fixes: 877c57d0d0ca ("tpm_crb: request and relinquish locality 0")
And shouldn't this also have
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
?
/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-25 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-24 15:43 [PATCH 1/2 v4] tpm: cmd_ready command can be issued only after granting locality Tomas Winkler
2018-02-24 15:43 ` Tomas Winkler
2018-02-25 9:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2018-02-25 9:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-25 10:37 ` Winkler, Tomas
2018-02-25 10:37 ` Winkler, Tomas
2018-02-25 13:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-25 13:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-25 14:43 ` Winkler, Tomas
2018-02-25 14:43 ` Winkler, Tomas
2018-02-26 11:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-26 11:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-02-25 14:44 ` Winkler, Tomas
2018-02-25 14:44 ` Winkler, Tomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180225094045.4zkqbrt5yi3ao562@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.usyskin@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.