All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com (Jonathan Cameron)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 13/20] firmware: arm_scmi: refactor in preparation to support per-protocol channels
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 14:35:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180305153549.00000f39@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519403030-21189-14-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:23:43 +0000
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:

> In order to support per-protocol channels if available, we need to
> factor out all the mailbox channel information(Tx/Rx payload and
> channel handle) out of the main SCMI instance information structure.
> 
> This patch refactors the existing channel information into a separate
> chan_info structure.
> 
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
A little odd to present a series to mainline that does a fairly important
refactor mid way through.  Why not push this down to the start and always support
the separate chan_info structure?

> ---
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> index e6698629e15a..a9e3f4c46b78 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,22 @@ struct scmi_desc {
>  };
>  
>  /**
> + * struct scmi_chan_info - Structure representing a SCMI channel informfation
> + *
> + * @cl: Mailbox Client
> + * @chan: Transmit/Receive mailbox channel
> + * @payload: Transmit/Receive mailbox channel payload area
> + * @dev: Reference to device in the SCMI hierarchy corresponding to this
> + *	 channel
> + */
> +struct scmi_chan_info {
> +	struct mbox_client cl;
> +	struct mbox_chan *chan;
> +	void __iomem *payload;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +};
> +
> +/**
>   * struct scmi_info - Structure representing a  SCMI instance
>   *
>   * @dev: Device pointer
> @@ -109,10 +125,8 @@ struct scmi_desc {
>   * @handle: Instance of SCMI handle to send to clients
>   * @version: SCMI revision information containing protocol version,
>   *	implementation version and (sub-)vendor identification.
> - * @cl: Mailbox Client
> - * @tx_chan: Transmit mailbox channel
> - * @tx_payload: Transmit mailbox channel payload area
>   * @minfo: Message info
> + * @tx_cinfo: Reference to SCMI channel information
>   * @protocols_imp: list of protocols implemented, currently maximum of
>   *	MAX_PROTOCOLS_IMP elements allocated by the base protocol
>   * @node: list head
> @@ -123,16 +137,14 @@ struct scmi_info {
>  	const struct scmi_desc *desc;
>  	struct scmi_revision_info version;
>  	struct scmi_handle handle;
> -	struct mbox_client cl;
> -	struct mbox_chan *tx_chan;
> -	void __iomem *tx_payload;
>  	struct scmi_xfers_info minfo;
> +	struct scmi_chan_info *tx_cinfo;
>  	u8 *protocols_imp;
>  	struct list_head node;
>  	int users;
>  };
>  
> -#define client_to_scmi_info(c)	container_of(c, struct scmi_info, cl)
> +#define client_to_scmi_chan_info(c) container_of(c, struct scmi_chan_info, cl)
>  #define handle_to_scmi_info(h)	container_of(h, struct scmi_info, handle)
>  
>  /*
> @@ -215,10 +227,11 @@ static void scmi_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *cl, void *m)
>  {
>  	u16 xfer_id;
>  	struct scmi_xfer *xfer;
> -	struct scmi_info *info = client_to_scmi_info(cl);
> +	struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo = client_to_scmi_chan_info(cl);
> +	struct device *dev = cinfo->dev;
> +	struct scmi_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo = &info->minfo;
> -	struct device *dev = info->dev;
> -	struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *mem = info->tx_payload;
> +	struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *mem = cinfo->payload;
>  
>  	xfer_id = MSG_XTRACT_TOKEN(ioread32(&mem->msg_header));
>  
> @@ -269,8 +282,8 @@ static inline u32 pack_scmi_header(struct scmi_msg_hdr *hdr)
>  static void scmi_tx_prepare(struct mbox_client *cl, void *m)
>  {
>  	struct scmi_xfer *t = m;
> -	struct scmi_info *info = client_to_scmi_info(cl);
> -	struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *mem = info->tx_payload;
> +	struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo = client_to_scmi_chan_info(cl);
> +	struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *mem = cinfo->payload;
>  
>  	/* Mark channel busy + clear error */
>  	iowrite32(0x0, &mem->channel_status);
> @@ -349,27 +362,27 @@ void scmi_one_xfer_put(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
>  }
>  
>  static bool
> -scmi_xfer_poll_done(const struct scmi_info *info, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
> +scmi_xfer_poll_done(const struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
>  {
> -	struct scmi_shared_mem *mem = info->tx_payload;
> -	u16 xfer_id = MSG_XTRACT_TOKEN(le32_to_cpu(mem->msg_header));
> +	struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *mem = cinfo->payload;
> +	u16 xfer_id = MSG_XTRACT_TOKEN(ioread32(&mem->msg_header));
>  
>  	if (xfer->hdr.seq != xfer_id)
>  		return false;
>  
> -	return le32_to_cpu(mem->channel_status) &
> +	return ioread32(&mem->channel_status) &
>  		(SCMI_SHMEM_CHAN_STAT_CHANNEL_ERROR |
>  		SCMI_SHMEM_CHAN_STAT_CHANNEL_FREE);
>  }
>  
>  #define SCMI_MAX_POLL_TO_NS	(100 * NSEC_PER_USEC)
>  
> -static bool scmi_xfer_done_no_timeout(const struct scmi_info *info,
> +static bool scmi_xfer_done_no_timeout(const struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
>  				      struct scmi_xfer *xfer, ktime_t stop)
>  {
>  	ktime_t __cur = ktime_get();
>  
> -	return scmi_xfer_poll_done(info, xfer) || ktime_after(__cur, stop);
> +	return scmi_xfer_poll_done(cinfo, xfer) || ktime_after(__cur, stop);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -388,8 +401,9 @@ int scmi_do_xfer(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
>  	int timeout;
>  	struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(handle);
>  	struct device *dev = info->dev;
> +	struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo = info->tx_cinfo;
>  
> -	ret = mbox_send_message(info->tx_chan, xfer);
> +	ret = mbox_send_message(cinfo->chan, xfer);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_dbg(dev, "mbox send fail %d\n", ret);
>  		return ret;
> @@ -401,10 +415,10 @@ int scmi_do_xfer(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
>  	if (xfer->hdr.poll_completion) {
>  		ktime_t stop = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(), SCMI_MAX_POLL_TO_NS);
>  
> -		spin_until_cond(scmi_xfer_done_no_timeout(info, xfer, stop));
> +		spin_until_cond(scmi_xfer_done_no_timeout(cinfo, xfer, stop));
>  
>  		if (ktime_before(ktime_get(), stop))
> -			scmi_fetch_response(xfer, info->tx_payload);
> +			scmi_fetch_response(xfer, cinfo->payload);
>  		else
>  			ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
>  	} else {
> @@ -426,7 +440,7 @@ int scmi_do_xfer(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
>  	 * Unfortunately, we have to kick the mailbox framework after we have
>  	 * received our message.
>  	 */
> -	mbox_client_txdone(info->tx_chan, ret);
> +	mbox_client_txdone(cinfo->chan, ret);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -654,11 +668,11 @@ static int scmi_mailbox_check(struct device_node *np)
>  	return of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "mboxes", "#mbox-cells", 0, &arg);
>  }
>  
> -static int scmi_mbox_free_channel(struct scmi_info *info)
> +static int scmi_mbox_free_channel(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo)
>  {
> -	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(info->tx_chan)) {
> -		mbox_free_channel(info->tx_chan);
> -		info->tx_chan = NULL;
> +	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cinfo->chan)) {
> +		mbox_free_channel(cinfo->chan);
> +		cinfo->chan = NULL;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -678,7 +692,7 @@ static int scmi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	if (!ret)
>  		/* Safe to free channels since no more users */
> -		return scmi_mbox_free_channel(info);
> +		return scmi_mbox_free_channel(info->tx_cinfo);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -690,9 +704,17 @@ static inline int scmi_mbox_chan_setup(struct scmi_info *info)
>  	resource_size_t size;
>  	struct device *dev = info->dev;
>  	struct device_node *shmem, *np = dev->of_node;
> +	struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo;
>  	struct mbox_client *cl;
>  
> -	cl = &info->cl;
> +	cinfo = devm_kzalloc(info->dev, sizeof(*cinfo), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!cinfo)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	info->tx_cinfo = cinfo;
> +	cinfo->dev = dev;
> +
> +	cl = &cinfo->cl;
>  	cl->dev = dev;
>  	cl->rx_callback = scmi_rx_callback;
>  	cl->tx_prepare = scmi_tx_prepare;
> @@ -708,16 +730,16 @@ static inline int scmi_mbox_chan_setup(struct scmi_info *info)
>  	}
>  
>  	size = resource_size(&res);
> -	info->tx_payload = devm_ioremap(dev, res.start, size);
> -	if (!info->tx_payload) {
> +	cinfo->payload = devm_ioremap(info->dev, res.start, size);
> +	if (!cinfo->payload) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "failed to ioremap SCMI Tx payload\n");
>  		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Transmit channel is first entry i.e. index 0 */
> -	info->tx_chan = mbox_request_channel(cl, 0);
> -	if (IS_ERR(info->tx_chan)) {
> -		ret = PTR_ERR(info->tx_chan);
> +	cinfo->chan = mbox_request_channel(cl, 0);
> +	if (IS_ERR(cinfo->chan)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(cinfo->chan);
>  		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>  			dev_err(dev, "failed to request SCMI Tx mailbox\n");
>  		return ret;
> @@ -785,7 +807,7 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	ret = scmi_base_protocol_init(handle);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "unable to communicate with SCMI(%d)\n", ret);
> -		scmi_mbox_free_channel(info);
> +		scmi_mbox_free_channel(info->tx_cinfo);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 13/20] firmware: arm_scmi: refactor in preparation to support per-protocol channels
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 14:35:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180305153549.00000f39@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519403030-21189-14-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:23:43 +0000
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:

> In order to support per-protocol channels if available, we need to
> factor out all the mailbox channel information(Tx/Rx payload and
> channel handle) out of the main SCMI instance information structure.
> 
> This patch refactors the existing channel information into a separate
> chan_info structure.
> 
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
A little odd to present a series to mainline that does a fairly important
refactor mid way through.  Why not push this down to the start and always support
the separate chan_info structure?

> ---
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> index e6698629e15a..a9e3f4c46b78 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,22 @@ struct scmi_desc {
>  };
>  
>  /**
> + * struct scmi_chan_info - Structure representing a SCMI channel informfation
> + *
> + * @cl: Mailbox Client
> + * @chan: Transmit/Receive mailbox channel
> + * @payload: Transmit/Receive mailbox channel payload area
> + * @dev: Reference to device in the SCMI hierarchy corresponding to this
> + *	 channel
> + */
> +struct scmi_chan_info {
> +	struct mbox_client cl;
> +	struct mbox_chan *chan;
> +	void __iomem *payload;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +};
> +
> +/**
>   * struct scmi_info - Structure representing a  SCMI instance
>   *
>   * @dev: Device pointer
> @@ -109,10 +125,8 @@ struct scmi_desc {
>   * @handle: Instance of SCMI handle to send to clients
>   * @version: SCMI revision information containing protocol version,
>   *	implementation version and (sub-)vendor identification.
> - * @cl: Mailbox Client
> - * @tx_chan: Transmit mailbox channel
> - * @tx_payload: Transmit mailbox channel payload area
>   * @minfo: Message info
> + * @tx_cinfo: Reference to SCMI channel information
>   * @protocols_imp: list of protocols implemented, currently maximum of
>   *	MAX_PROTOCOLS_IMP elements allocated by the base protocol
>   * @node: list head
> @@ -123,16 +137,14 @@ struct scmi_info {
>  	const struct scmi_desc *desc;
>  	struct scmi_revision_info version;
>  	struct scmi_handle handle;
> -	struct mbox_client cl;
> -	struct mbox_chan *tx_chan;
> -	void __iomem *tx_payload;
>  	struct scmi_xfers_info minfo;
> +	struct scmi_chan_info *tx_cinfo;
>  	u8 *protocols_imp;
>  	struct list_head node;
>  	int users;
>  };
>  
> -#define client_to_scmi_info(c)	container_of(c, struct scmi_info, cl)
> +#define client_to_scmi_chan_info(c) container_of(c, struct scmi_chan_info, cl)
>  #define handle_to_scmi_info(h)	container_of(h, struct scmi_info, handle)
>  
>  /*
> @@ -215,10 +227,11 @@ static void scmi_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *cl, void *m)
>  {
>  	u16 xfer_id;
>  	struct scmi_xfer *xfer;
> -	struct scmi_info *info = client_to_scmi_info(cl);
> +	struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo = client_to_scmi_chan_info(cl);
> +	struct device *dev = cinfo->dev;
> +	struct scmi_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo = &info->minfo;
> -	struct device *dev = info->dev;
> -	struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *mem = info->tx_payload;
> +	struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *mem = cinfo->payload;
>  
>  	xfer_id = MSG_XTRACT_TOKEN(ioread32(&mem->msg_header));
>  
> @@ -269,8 +282,8 @@ static inline u32 pack_scmi_header(struct scmi_msg_hdr *hdr)
>  static void scmi_tx_prepare(struct mbox_client *cl, void *m)
>  {
>  	struct scmi_xfer *t = m;
> -	struct scmi_info *info = client_to_scmi_info(cl);
> -	struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *mem = info->tx_payload;
> +	struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo = client_to_scmi_chan_info(cl);
> +	struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *mem = cinfo->payload;
>  
>  	/* Mark channel busy + clear error */
>  	iowrite32(0x0, &mem->channel_status);
> @@ -349,27 +362,27 @@ void scmi_one_xfer_put(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
>  }
>  
>  static bool
> -scmi_xfer_poll_done(const struct scmi_info *info, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
> +scmi_xfer_poll_done(const struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
>  {
> -	struct scmi_shared_mem *mem = info->tx_payload;
> -	u16 xfer_id = MSG_XTRACT_TOKEN(le32_to_cpu(mem->msg_header));
> +	struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *mem = cinfo->payload;
> +	u16 xfer_id = MSG_XTRACT_TOKEN(ioread32(&mem->msg_header));
>  
>  	if (xfer->hdr.seq != xfer_id)
>  		return false;
>  
> -	return le32_to_cpu(mem->channel_status) &
> +	return ioread32(&mem->channel_status) &
>  		(SCMI_SHMEM_CHAN_STAT_CHANNEL_ERROR |
>  		SCMI_SHMEM_CHAN_STAT_CHANNEL_FREE);
>  }
>  
>  #define SCMI_MAX_POLL_TO_NS	(100 * NSEC_PER_USEC)
>  
> -static bool scmi_xfer_done_no_timeout(const struct scmi_info *info,
> +static bool scmi_xfer_done_no_timeout(const struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
>  				      struct scmi_xfer *xfer, ktime_t stop)
>  {
>  	ktime_t __cur = ktime_get();
>  
> -	return scmi_xfer_poll_done(info, xfer) || ktime_after(__cur, stop);
> +	return scmi_xfer_poll_done(cinfo, xfer) || ktime_after(__cur, stop);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -388,8 +401,9 @@ int scmi_do_xfer(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
>  	int timeout;
>  	struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(handle);
>  	struct device *dev = info->dev;
> +	struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo = info->tx_cinfo;
>  
> -	ret = mbox_send_message(info->tx_chan, xfer);
> +	ret = mbox_send_message(cinfo->chan, xfer);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_dbg(dev, "mbox send fail %d\n", ret);
>  		return ret;
> @@ -401,10 +415,10 @@ int scmi_do_xfer(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
>  	if (xfer->hdr.poll_completion) {
>  		ktime_t stop = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(), SCMI_MAX_POLL_TO_NS);
>  
> -		spin_until_cond(scmi_xfer_done_no_timeout(info, xfer, stop));
> +		spin_until_cond(scmi_xfer_done_no_timeout(cinfo, xfer, stop));
>  
>  		if (ktime_before(ktime_get(), stop))
> -			scmi_fetch_response(xfer, info->tx_payload);
> +			scmi_fetch_response(xfer, cinfo->payload);
>  		else
>  			ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
>  	} else {
> @@ -426,7 +440,7 @@ int scmi_do_xfer(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
>  	 * Unfortunately, we have to kick the mailbox framework after we have
>  	 * received our message.
>  	 */
> -	mbox_client_txdone(info->tx_chan, ret);
> +	mbox_client_txdone(cinfo->chan, ret);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -654,11 +668,11 @@ static int scmi_mailbox_check(struct device_node *np)
>  	return of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "mboxes", "#mbox-cells", 0, &arg);
>  }
>  
> -static int scmi_mbox_free_channel(struct scmi_info *info)
> +static int scmi_mbox_free_channel(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo)
>  {
> -	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(info->tx_chan)) {
> -		mbox_free_channel(info->tx_chan);
> -		info->tx_chan = NULL;
> +	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cinfo->chan)) {
> +		mbox_free_channel(cinfo->chan);
> +		cinfo->chan = NULL;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -678,7 +692,7 @@ static int scmi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	if (!ret)
>  		/* Safe to free channels since no more users */
> -		return scmi_mbox_free_channel(info);
> +		return scmi_mbox_free_channel(info->tx_cinfo);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -690,9 +704,17 @@ static inline int scmi_mbox_chan_setup(struct scmi_info *info)
>  	resource_size_t size;
>  	struct device *dev = info->dev;
>  	struct device_node *shmem, *np = dev->of_node;
> +	struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo;
>  	struct mbox_client *cl;
>  
> -	cl = &info->cl;
> +	cinfo = devm_kzalloc(info->dev, sizeof(*cinfo), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!cinfo)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	info->tx_cinfo = cinfo;
> +	cinfo->dev = dev;
> +
> +	cl = &cinfo->cl;
>  	cl->dev = dev;
>  	cl->rx_callback = scmi_rx_callback;
>  	cl->tx_prepare = scmi_tx_prepare;
> @@ -708,16 +730,16 @@ static inline int scmi_mbox_chan_setup(struct scmi_info *info)
>  	}
>  
>  	size = resource_size(&res);
> -	info->tx_payload = devm_ioremap(dev, res.start, size);
> -	if (!info->tx_payload) {
> +	cinfo->payload = devm_ioremap(info->dev, res.start, size);
> +	if (!cinfo->payload) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "failed to ioremap SCMI Tx payload\n");
>  		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Transmit channel is first entry i.e. index 0 */
> -	info->tx_chan = mbox_request_channel(cl, 0);
> -	if (IS_ERR(info->tx_chan)) {
> -		ret = PTR_ERR(info->tx_chan);
> +	cinfo->chan = mbox_request_channel(cl, 0);
> +	if (IS_ERR(cinfo->chan)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(cinfo->chan);
>  		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>  			dev_err(dev, "failed to request SCMI Tx mailbox\n");
>  		return ret;
> @@ -785,7 +807,7 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	ret = scmi_base_protocol_init(handle);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "unable to communicate with SCMI(%d)\n", ret);
> -		scmi_mbox_free_channel(info);
> +		scmi_mbox_free_channel(info->tx_cinfo);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-05 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-23 16:23 [PATCH v6 00/20] firmware: ARM System Control and Management Interface(SCMI) support Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 01/20] dt-bindings: mailbox: add support for mailbox client shared memory Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 02/20] dt-bindings: arm: add support for ARM System Control and Management Interface(SCMI) protocol Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 03/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add basic driver infrastructure for SCMI Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-26 15:57   ` Philippe Ombredanne
2018-02-26 15:57     ` Philippe Ombredanne
2018-02-26 17:10     ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-26 17:10       ` Sudeep Holla
2018-03-05 13:52   ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-03-05 13:52     ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-03-05 14:30     ` Sudeep Holla
2018-03-05 14:30       ` Sudeep Holla
2018-03-05 14:47       ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-03-05 14:47         ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 04/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add common infrastructure and support for base protocol Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-03-05 14:11   ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-03-05 14:11     ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 05/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add scmi protocol bus to enumerate protocol devices Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-03-05 14:23   ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-03-05 14:23     ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 06/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for performance protocol Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-03-05 14:29   ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-03-05 14:29     ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 07/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for clock protocol Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 08/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for power protocol Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 09/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for sensor protocol Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 10/20] firmware: arm_scmi: probe and initialise all the supported protocols Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 11/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add support for polling based SCMI transfers Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 12/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add option for polling based performance domain operations Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 13/20] firmware: arm_scmi: refactor in preparation to support per-protocol channels Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-03-05 14:35   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2018-03-05 14:35     ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-03-05 14:43     ` Sudeep Holla
2018-03-05 14:43       ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 14/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add per-protocol channels support using idr objects Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 15/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add device power domain support using genpd Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 16/20] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCMI Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-03-16 23:02   ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-16 23:02     ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-16 23:02     ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-16 23:02     ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 12:08     ` Sudeep Holla
2018-03-20 12:08       ` Sudeep Holla
2018-03-20 16:22       ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 16:22         ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 16:22         ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 16:22         ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 12:11   ` [PATCH] clk: scmi: use devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider() API and drop scmi_clocks_remove Sudeep Holla
2018-03-20 14:42     ` Sudeep Holla
2018-03-20 16:22     ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 16:22       ` Stephen Boyd
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 17/20] hwmon: (core) Add hwmon_max to hwmon_sensor_types enumeration Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 18/20] hwmon: add support for sensors exported via ARM SCMI Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 19/20] cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI message protocol Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 20/20] cpufreq: scmi: add support for fast frequency switching Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23   ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180305153549.00000f39@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.