Re: [PATCH 04/13] x86: use generic swiotlb_ops

[Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>]

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:03:12PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> Also fix the sta2x11 case.  For that SOC the dma map ops need an
>> additional physical to dma address translations.  For swiotlb buffers
>> that is done throught the phys_to_dma helper, but the sta2x11_dma_ops
>> also added an additional translation on the return value from
>> x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent, which is only correct if that functions
>> returns a direct allocation and not a swiotlb buffer.  With the
>> generic swiotlb and dma-direct code phys_to_dma is not always used
>> and the separate sta2x11_dma_ops can be replaced with a simple
>> bit that marks if the additional physical to dma address translation
>> is needed.
>
> FWIW, last time I looked I got the impression that STA2x11 could just use 
> dma_pfn_offset - the comments and a2p/p2a logic in sta2x11-fixup.c 
> certainly imply that the underlying hardware situation is pretty much 
> exactly that for which dma_pfn_offset exists.

That probably is the case.  But without access to the hardware I don't
feel like doing this deeper surgery.  And even without that this case
provides a great simplification.