From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Revert "dm mpath: remove unnecessary NVMe branching in favor of scsi_dh checks"
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:31:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180313163135.GB2785@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180313152551.GA2785@redhat.com>
On Tue, Mar 13 2018 at 11:25am -0400,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12 2018 at 5:32pm -0400,
> Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 17:23 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > Could you provide more details on your setup?
> > >
> > > Obviously you're using "queue_mode mq", what are your underlying paths?
> > >
> > > Given the trace it would seem you're hitting multipath_clone_and_map()'s
> > > blk_queue_dying(q) error path that calls activate_or_offline_path().
> >
> > Hello Mike,
> >
> > The reported kernel crash was triggered by running the following command:
> >
> > srp-test/run_tests -c -d -r 10 -t 02-mq
> >
> > The srp-test software is available at https://github.com/bvanassche/srp-test.
> > All patches necessary to run that script in a virtual machine (RoCE support
> > for the SRP initiator and target drivers) will be sent to Linus during the
> > kernel v4.17 merge window. These patches are already available in linux-next
> > today. Although I have not tried this myself, I expect that if you run the
> > above command against a kernel built from the linux-next code that that will
> > allow you to reproduce what I reported.
>
> A pointer to the commit ids in question would be helpful so I can
> appreciate the details better.
>
> Why is there need for a virtual machine?
> Just using extra isolation so as not to conflict with anything on the
> host?
>
> Anyway, I followed srp-test's README.md
>
> But sadly, today's linux-next (next-20180313) is a mess (lots of macro
> expansion breakage, for me anyway).
I fixed the linux-next build errors (I cc'd you on that).
But now I cannot get the test to run:
# srp-test/run_tests -c -d -r 10 -t 02-mq
Unloaded the ib_srpt kernel module
Unloaded the rdma_rxe kernel module
SoftRoCE network interfaces: rxe0 rxe1 rxe2 rxe3
Zero-initializing /dev/ram0 ... done
Zero-initializing /dev/ram1 ... done
Configured SRP target driver
Running test srp-test/tests/02-mq ...
Test file I/O on top of multipath concurrently with logout and login (0 min; mq)
Unloaded the ib_srp kernel module
/dev/disk/by-id/dm-uuid-mpath-3600140572616d6469736b31000000000: not found
Test srp-test/tests/02-mq failed
[ 379.634518] ib_srp: QP creation failed for dev rxe1: -22
[ 379.639849] srpt/10.16.43.122: Unsupported SCSI Opcode 0xa3, sending CHECK_CONDITION.
[ 379.665891] sd 7:0:0:1: [sdk] Attached SCSI disk
[ 379.673312] ib_srp: QP creation failed for dev rxe2: -22
[ 379.688331] ib_srp: QP creation failed for dev rxe3: -22
[ 379.708324] ib_srp: bad dest parameter '[2620:52:0:102f:219:99ff:feb7:2648'
[ 379.724538] ib_srp: target creation request is missing one or more parameters
[ 379.740253] ib_srp: bad dest parameter '[2620:52:0:102f:219:99ff:feb7:2648'
[ 379.756531] ib_srp: target creation request is missing one or more parameters
[ 379.773242] ib_srp: bad dest parameter '[2620:52:0:102f:219:99ff:feb7:2648'
[ 379.789532] ib_srp: target creation request is missing one or more parameters
[ 379.805255] ib_srp: bad dest parameter '[2620:52:0:102f:219:99ff:feb7:2648'
[ 379.822532] ib_srp: target creation request is missing one or more parameters
But I realized that was with an old srp-test build.. so I tried to make
again.. seems your buildrequires has expanded:
Why does it need shellcheck? On RHEL, having to pull in EPEL packages sucks.
And even once installed via EPEL (so ShellCheck-0.3.5-1.el7.x86_64):
# make
...
shellcheck -x -f gcc run_tests bin/getuid_callout lib/functions \
tests/*[^~]
unrecognized option `-x'
Usage: shellcheck [OPTIONS...] FILES...
-e CODE1,CODE2.. --exclude=CODE1,CODE2.. exclude types of warnings
-f FORMAT --format=FORMAT output format
-s SHELLNAME --shell=SHELLNAME Specify dialect (bash,sh,ksh,zsh)
-V --version Print version information
make: *** [shellcheck] Error 3
In general this srp-test suite is way too exotic with its requirements.
Barrier to entry from a dumb user like me is _way_ too high.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-13 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-12 20:28 [PATCH] Revert "dm mpath: remove unnecessary NVMe branching in favor of scsi_dh checks" Bart Van Assche
2018-03-12 21:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-03-12 21:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-13 1:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-03-13 16:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-13 17:02 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-03-13 17:07 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-03-13 17:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-13 21:41 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-03-14 16:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-13 15:25 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-03-13 16:31 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2018-03-13 16:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-13 16:58 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-03-30 17:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-13 16:38 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180313163135.GB2785@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.