From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Revert "dm mpath: remove unnecessary NVMe branching in favor of scsi_dh checks"
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:41:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180313214156.GA4325@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1520961057.2638.22.camel@wdc.com>
On Tue, Mar 13 2018 at 1:10pm -0400,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 13:07 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > Just a thought: Maybe dm-4.16 (rc4 based) is missing a blk-mq fix?
> >
> > Might be worth cherry-picking the 2 topmost commits from dm-4.16 into
> > the linus-based (rc5) tree you reported the original issue against?
> >
> > (looking at jens' rc5 block pull request, it seems unlikely but...)
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> Even if that would be the case, that can't have been the cause of what I
> reported. Before I run any dm tests I merge the block layer, SCSI and RDMA
> changes that are scheduled for the next kernel version into the dm tree.
Well I've rebased dm-4.16 ontop of v4.15-rc5. If you udate to latest
dm-4.16 and look at the following diff it is pretty clear that these
changes will not compromise dm-mpath's "mq" mode (which you're using):
git diff 8d47e65948ddea4398892946d9e50778a316b397^..e8f74a0f00113d74ac18d6de13096f9e2f95618a -- drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
I see no reason why you'd hit hangs with requests lingering on the requeue_list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-13 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-12 20:28 [PATCH] Revert "dm mpath: remove unnecessary NVMe branching in favor of scsi_dh checks" Bart Van Assche
2018-03-12 21:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-03-12 21:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-13 1:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-03-13 16:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-13 17:02 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-03-13 17:07 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-03-13 17:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-13 21:41 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2018-03-14 16:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-13 15:25 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-03-13 16:31 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-03-13 16:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-13 16:58 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-03-30 17:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-13 16:38 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180313214156.GA4325@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.