Re: [PATCH 5/8] trace_uprobe: Support SDT markers having reference count (semaphore)

[Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>]

On 03/19, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
> Hi Oleg,
> 
> On 03/14/2018 10:29 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 03/13, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> >> +static bool sdt_valid_vma(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> >> +{
> >> +	unsigned long vaddr = vma_offset_to_vaddr(vma, tu->ref_ctr_offset);
> >> +
> >> +	return tu->ref_ctr_offset &&
> >> +		vma->vm_file &&
> >> +		file_inode(vma->vm_file) == tu->inode &&
> >> +		vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE &&
> >> +		vma->vm_start <= vaddr &&
> >> +		vma->vm_end > vaddr;
> >> +}
> > Perhaps in this case a simple
> >
> > 		ref_ctr_offset < vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start
> >
> > check without vma_offset_to_vaddr() makes more sense, but I won't insist.
> >
> 
> I still don't get this. This seems a comparison between file offset and size
> of the vma. Shouldn't we need to consider pg_off here?

Indeed, I am stupid ;)

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html