From: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] big key: get rid of stack array allocation
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 22:05:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180321040553.GC18067@cisco> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180315015139.GA641@zzz.localdomain>
Hi Eric,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 06:51:39PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:29:06PM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> > We're interested in getting rid of all of the stack allocated arrays in the
> > kernel [1]. This patch removes one in keys by switching to malloc/free.
> > Note that we use kzalloc, to avoid leaking the nonce. I'm not sure this is
> > really necessary, but extra paranoia seems prudent.
> >
> > Manually tested using the program from the add_key man page to trigger
> > big_key.
> >
> > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
> > CC: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> > CC: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
> > CC: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
> > CC: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
> > ---
> > security/keys/big_key.c | 12 +++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/security/keys/big_key.c b/security/keys/big_key.c
> > index fa728f662a6f..70f9f785c59d 100644
> > --- a/security/keys/big_key.c
> > +++ b/security/keys/big_key.c
> > @@ -108,13 +108,18 @@ static int big_key_crypt(enum big_key_op op, struct big_key_buf *buf, size_t dat
> > * an .update function, so there's no chance we'll wind up reusing the
> > * key to encrypt updated data. Simply put: one key, one encryption.
> > */
> > - u8 zero_nonce[crypto_aead_ivsize(big_key_aead)];
> > + u8 *zero_nonce;
> > +
> > + zero_nonce = kzalloc(crypto_aead_ivsize(big_key_aead), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!zero_nonce)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > aead_req = aead_request_alloc(big_key_aead, GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!aead_req)
> > + if (!aead_req) {
> > + kfree(zero_nonce);
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> >
> > - memset(zero_nonce, 0, sizeof(zero_nonce));
> > aead_request_set_crypt(aead_req, buf->sg, buf->sg, datalen, zero_nonce);
> > aead_request_set_callback(aead_req, CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP, NULL, NULL);
> > aead_request_set_ad(aead_req, 0);
> > @@ -131,6 +136,7 @@ static int big_key_crypt(enum big_key_op op, struct big_key_buf *buf, size_t dat
> > error:
> > mutex_unlock(&big_key_aead_lock);
> > aead_request_free(aead_req);
> > + kzfree(zero_nonce);
> > return ret;
>
> A dynamic allocation here doesn't make sense -- the algorithm is hard-coded to
> AES-GCM, so the IV size is fixed. You should just include <crypto/gcm.h> and
> use GCM_AES_IV_LEN. As a sanity check you can add
> 'BUG_ON(crypto_aead_ivsize(big_key_aead) != GCM_AES_IV_LEN' to big_key_init().
>
> kzfree() also doesn't make sense since the nonce is not secret information.
Thanks, I've fixed this for v2.
Cheers,
Tycho
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] big key: get rid of stack array allocation
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 04:05:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180321040553.GC18067@cisco> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180315015139.GA641@zzz.localdomain>
Hi Eric,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 06:51:39PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:29:06PM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> > We're interested in getting rid of all of the stack allocated arrays in the
> > kernel [1]. This patch removes one in keys by switching to malloc/free.
> > Note that we use kzalloc, to avoid leaking the nonce. I'm not sure this is
> > really necessary, but extra paranoia seems prudent.
> >
> > Manually tested using the program from the add_key man page to trigger
> > big_key.
> >
> > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
> > CC: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> > CC: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
> > CC: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
> > CC: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
> > ---
> > security/keys/big_key.c | 12 +++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/security/keys/big_key.c b/security/keys/big_key.c
> > index fa728f662a6f..70f9f785c59d 100644
> > --- a/security/keys/big_key.c
> > +++ b/security/keys/big_key.c
> > @@ -108,13 +108,18 @@ static int big_key_crypt(enum big_key_op op, struct big_key_buf *buf, size_t dat
> > * an .update function, so there's no chance we'll wind up reusing the
> > * key to encrypt updated data. Simply put: one key, one encryption.
> > */
> > - u8 zero_nonce[crypto_aead_ivsize(big_key_aead)];
> > + u8 *zero_nonce;
> > +
> > + zero_nonce = kzalloc(crypto_aead_ivsize(big_key_aead), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!zero_nonce)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > aead_req = aead_request_alloc(big_key_aead, GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!aead_req)
> > + if (!aead_req) {
> > + kfree(zero_nonce);
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> >
> > - memset(zero_nonce, 0, sizeof(zero_nonce));
> > aead_request_set_crypt(aead_req, buf->sg, buf->sg, datalen, zero_nonce);
> > aead_request_set_callback(aead_req, CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP, NULL, NULL);
> > aead_request_set_ad(aead_req, 0);
> > @@ -131,6 +136,7 @@ static int big_key_crypt(enum big_key_op op, struct big_key_buf *buf, size_t dat
> > error:
> > mutex_unlock(&big_key_aead_lock);
> > aead_request_free(aead_req);
> > + kzfree(zero_nonce);
> > return ret;
>
> A dynamic allocation here doesn't make sense -- the algorithm is hard-coded to
> AES-GCM, so the IV size is fixed. You should just include <crypto/gcm.h> and
> use GCM_AES_IV_LEN. As a sanity check you can add
> 'BUG_ON(crypto_aead_ivsize(big_key_aead) != GCM_AES_IV_LEN' to big_key_init().
>
> kzfree() also doesn't make sense since the nonce is not secret information.
Thanks, I've fixed this for v2.
Cheers,
Tycho
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tycho@tycho.ws (Tycho Andersen)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] big key: get rid of stack array allocation
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 22:05:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180321040553.GC18067@cisco> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180315015139.GA641@zzz.localdomain>
Hi Eric,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 06:51:39PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:29:06PM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> > We're interested in getting rid of all of the stack allocated arrays in the
> > kernel [1]. This patch removes one in keys by switching to malloc/free.
> > Note that we use kzalloc, to avoid leaking the nonce. I'm not sure this is
> > really necessary, but extra paranoia seems prudent.
> >
> > Manually tested using the program from the add_key man page to trigger
> > big_key.
> >
> > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
> > CC: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> > CC: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
> > CC: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
> > CC: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
> > ---
> > security/keys/big_key.c | 12 +++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/security/keys/big_key.c b/security/keys/big_key.c
> > index fa728f662a6f..70f9f785c59d 100644
> > --- a/security/keys/big_key.c
> > +++ b/security/keys/big_key.c
> > @@ -108,13 +108,18 @@ static int big_key_crypt(enum big_key_op op, struct big_key_buf *buf, size_t dat
> > * an .update function, so there's no chance we'll wind up reusing the
> > * key to encrypt updated data. Simply put: one key, one encryption.
> > */
> > - u8 zero_nonce[crypto_aead_ivsize(big_key_aead)];
> > + u8 *zero_nonce;
> > +
> > + zero_nonce = kzalloc(crypto_aead_ivsize(big_key_aead), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!zero_nonce)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > aead_req = aead_request_alloc(big_key_aead, GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!aead_req)
> > + if (!aead_req) {
> > + kfree(zero_nonce);
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> >
> > - memset(zero_nonce, 0, sizeof(zero_nonce));
> > aead_request_set_crypt(aead_req, buf->sg, buf->sg, datalen, zero_nonce);
> > aead_request_set_callback(aead_req, CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP, NULL, NULL);
> > aead_request_set_ad(aead_req, 0);
> > @@ -131,6 +136,7 @@ static int big_key_crypt(enum big_key_op op, struct big_key_buf *buf, size_t dat
> > error:
> > mutex_unlock(&big_key_aead_lock);
> > aead_request_free(aead_req);
> > + kzfree(zero_nonce);
> > return ret;
>
> A dynamic allocation here doesn't make sense -- the algorithm is hard-coded to
> AES-GCM, so the IV size is fixed. You should just include <crypto/gcm.h> and
> use GCM_AES_IV_LEN. As a sanity check you can add
> 'BUG_ON(crypto_aead_ivsize(big_key_aead) != GCM_AES_IV_LEN' to big_key_init().
>
> kzfree() also doesn't make sense since the nonce is not secret information.
Thanks, I've fixed this for v2.
Cheers,
Tycho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-21 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-13 4:29 [PATCH 1/2] big key: get rid of stack array allocation Tycho Andersen
2018-03-13 4:29 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-03-13 4:29 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-03-13 4:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] dh " Tycho Andersen
2018-03-13 4:29 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-03-13 4:29 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-03-13 17:39 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2018-03-13 17:39 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2018-03-13 17:39 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2018-03-15 2:21 ` Eric Biggers
2018-03-15 2:21 ` Eric Biggers
2018-03-15 2:21 ` Eric Biggers
2018-03-21 4:05 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-03-21 4:05 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-03-21 4:05 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-03-15 1:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] big " Eric Biggers
2018-03-15 1:51 ` Eric Biggers
2018-03-15 1:51 ` Eric Biggers
2018-03-21 4:05 ` Tycho Andersen [this message]
2018-03-21 4:05 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-03-21 4:05 ` Tycho Andersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180321040553.GC18067@cisco \
--to=tycho@tycho.ws \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.