From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Sridhar Pitchai <Sridhar.Pitchai@microsoft.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@microsoft.com>,
Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3]PCI: hv: fix PCI-BUS domainID corruption
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 17:47:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180323164716.GA7794@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A0639B-3C54-456D-95C1-829332C024EE@microsoft.com>
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 04:41:02PM +0000, Sridhar Pitchai wrote:
> Please read the link I sent you in relation to email formatting.
>
> Then add your description above in a way that anyone not 100% familiar
> with hyperv can understand it - that's what the commit log is for.
>
> You are sending this patch to stable kernels, patch above has been in
> the kernel from v4.14. The patch you are fixing since v4.11, you ought
> to be careful since you do not want to have broken kernel versions owing
> to stable patches mismatches, that's why I asked and I will ask again,
> are you sure you won't trigger a regression by sending this fix to
> stable ?
>
> I assume the bond driver mechanism is now done and dusted.
>
> That is correct. I have sent a v4 version of the patch. I am sending this
> patch for stable kernel. We have tested and I am sure this should not trigger
> regression by sending this fix to stable.
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Sridhar Pitchai <Sridhar.Pitchai@microsoft.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Michael Kelley \(EOSG\)" <Michael.H.Kelley@microsoft.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com>,
"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3]PCI: hv: fix PCI-BUS domainID corruption
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 17:47:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180323164716.GA7794@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A0639B-3C54-456D-95C1-829332C024EE@microsoft.com>
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 04:41:02PM +0000, Sridhar Pitchai wrote:
> Please read the link I sent you in relation to email formatting.
>
> Then add your description above in a way that anyone not 100% familiar
> with hyperv can understand it - that's what the commit log is for.
>
> You are sending this patch to stable kernels, patch above has been in
> the kernel from v4.14. The patch you are fixing since v4.11, you ought
> to be careful since you do not want to have broken kernel versions owing
> to stable patches mismatches, that's why I asked and I will ask again,
> are you sure you won't trigger a regression by sending this fix to
> stable ?
>
> I assume the bond driver mechanism is now done and dusted.
>
> That is correct. I have sent a v4 version of the patch. I am sending this
> patch for stable kernel. We have tested and I am sure this should not trigger
> regression by sending this fix to stable.
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-23 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-15 0:03 [PATCH v3]PCI: hv: fix PCI-BUS domainID corruption Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-15 0:03 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-15 12:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-03-15 12:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-03-15 17:56 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-15 17:56 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-15 18:24 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-15 18:24 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-20 17:56 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-20 17:56 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-20 18:32 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-03-20 18:32 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-03-20 23:00 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-20 23:00 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-21 16:26 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-03-21 16:26 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-03-23 16:41 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-23 16:41 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-23 16:47 ` Greg KH [this message]
2018-03-23 16:47 ` Greg KH
2018-03-26 17:32 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-26 17:32 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-21 17:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-03-21 17:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-03-23 16:09 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-23 16:09 ` Sridhar Pitchai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180323164716.GA7794@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Michael.H.Kelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=Sridhar.Pitchai@microsoft.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=jakeo@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.