All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com,
	luto@amacapital.net, efault@gmx.de,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] cpuset: Add cpuset.sched_load_balance to v2
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:02:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180327140259.GN1840639@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf79b45e-7716-65af-03ca-7112dc367371@redhat.com>

Hello,

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 04:28:49PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> Maybe we can have a different root level flag, say,
> sched_partition_domain that is equivalent to !sched_load_balnace.
> However, I am still not sure if we should enforce that no task should be
> in the root cgroup when the flag is set.
> 
> Tejun and Peter, what are your thoughts on this?

I haven't looked into the other issues too much but we for sure cannot
empty the root cgroup.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com,
	luto@amacapital.net, efault@gmx.de,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] cpuset: Add cpuset.sched_load_balance to v2
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:02:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180327140259.GN1840639@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf79b45e-7716-65af-03ca-7112dc367371@redhat.com>

Hello,

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 04:28:49PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> Maybe we can have a different root level flag, say,
> sched_partition_domain that is equivalent to !sched_load_balnace.
> However, I am still not sure if we should enforce that no task should be
> in the root cgroup when the flag is set.
> 
> Tejun and Peter, what are your thoughts on this?

I haven't looked into the other issues too much but we for sure cannot
empty the root cgroup.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-27 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-21 16:21 [PATCH v6 0/2] cpuset: Enable cpuset controller in default hierarchy Waiman Long
2018-03-21 16:21 ` Waiman Long
2018-03-21 16:21 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] " Waiman Long
2018-03-21 16:21   ` Waiman Long
2018-03-21 16:21 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] cpuset: Add cpuset.sched_load_balance to v2 Waiman Long
2018-03-21 16:21   ` Waiman Long
2018-03-22  8:41   ` Juri Lelli
2018-03-22  8:41     ` Juri Lelli
2018-03-22 21:50     ` Waiman Long
2018-03-22 21:50       ` Waiman Long
2018-03-23  7:59       ` Juri Lelli
2018-03-23  7:59         ` Juri Lelli
2018-03-23 18:44         ` Waiman Long
2018-03-23 18:44           ` Waiman Long
2018-03-26 12:47           ` Juri Lelli
2018-03-26 12:47             ` Juri Lelli
2018-03-26 20:28             ` Waiman Long
2018-03-26 20:28               ` Waiman Long
2018-03-27  6:17               ` Juri Lelli
2018-03-27  6:17                 ` Juri Lelli
2018-03-27  6:54               ` Mike Galbraith
2018-03-27  6:54                 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-03-27 14:02               ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-03-27 14:02                 ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-27 14:23                 ` Waiman Long
2018-03-27 14:23                   ` Waiman Long
2018-03-28  6:57                   ` Mike Galbraith
2018-03-28  6:57                     ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180327140259.GN1840639@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.