All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vhost: correctly remove wait queue during poll failure
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:58:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180327165330-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1576bcf-652a-7c1a-9d77-db54931ab979@redhat.com>

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 05:43:14PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2018年03月27日 17:28, Darren Kenny wrote:
> > Hi Jason,
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:47:22AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > We tried to remove vq poll from wait queue, but do not check whether
> > > or not it was in a list before. This will lead double free. Fixing
> > > this by checking poll->wqh to make sure it was in a list.
> > 
> > This text seems at odds with the code below, instead of checking
> > poll-whq, you are removing that check...
> > 
> > Maybe the text needs rewording?
> 
> Yes, I admit it's bad, thanks for pointing out.
> 
> How about:
> 
> "Fixing this by switching to use vhost_poll_stop() which zeros poll->wqh
> after removing poll from waitqueue to make sure it won't be freed twice."
> 
> Thanks

Let's be a bit more specific about the problem maybe?

when vhost's attempt to start polling a descriptor fails, we remove the
poll->wqh entry from wait queue but do not clear it, so the following
cleanup (e.g. on release) will attempt to remove it again.

To fix, switch to vhost_poll_stop() which zeros poll->wqh
after removing poll from waitqueue to make sure it won't be freed twice."


the patch itself is fine though:


Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>


> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Darren.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: syzbot+c0272972b01b872e604a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > > Fixes: 2b8b328b61c79 ("vhost_net: handle polling errors when setting
> > > backend")
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 3 +--
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > > index 1b3e8d2d..5d5a9d9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > > @@ -212,8 +212,7 @@ int vhost_poll_start(struct vhost_poll *poll,
> > > struct file *file)
> > >     if (mask)
> > >         vhost_poll_wakeup(&poll->wait, 0, 0, poll_to_key(mask));
> > >     if (mask & EPOLLERR) {
> > > -        if (poll->wqh)
> > > -            remove_wait_queue(poll->wqh, &poll->wait);
> > > +        vhost_poll_stop(poll);
> > >         ret = -EINVAL;
> > >     }
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > 2.7.4
> > > 
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vhost: correctly remove wait queue during poll failure
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:58:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180327165330-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1576bcf-652a-7c1a-9d77-db54931ab979@redhat.com>

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 05:43:14PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2018年03月27日 17:28, Darren Kenny wrote:
> > Hi Jason,
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:47:22AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > We tried to remove vq poll from wait queue, but do not check whether
> > > or not it was in a list before. This will lead double free. Fixing
> > > this by checking poll->wqh to make sure it was in a list.
> > 
> > This text seems at odds with the code below, instead of checking
> > poll-whq, you are removing that check...
> > 
> > Maybe the text needs rewording?
> 
> Yes, I admit it's bad, thanks for pointing out.
> 
> How about:
> 
> "Fixing this by switching to use vhost_poll_stop() which zeros poll->wqh
> after removing poll from waitqueue to make sure it won't be freed twice."
> 
> Thanks

Let's be a bit more specific about the problem maybe?

when vhost's attempt to start polling a descriptor fails, we remove the
poll->wqh entry from wait queue but do not clear it, so the following
cleanup (e.g. on release) will attempt to remove it again.

To fix, switch to vhost_poll_stop() which zeros poll->wqh
after removing poll from waitqueue to make sure it won't be freed twice."


the patch itself is fine though:


Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>


> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Darren.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: syzbot+c0272972b01b872e604a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > > Fixes: 2b8b328b61c79 ("vhost_net: handle polling errors when setting
> > > backend")
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 3 +--
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > > index 1b3e8d2d..5d5a9d9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > > @@ -212,8 +212,7 @@ int vhost_poll_start(struct vhost_poll *poll,
> > > struct file *file)
> > >     if (mask)
> > >         vhost_poll_wakeup(&poll->wait, 0, 0, poll_to_key(mask));
> > >     if (mask & EPOLLERR) {
> > > -        if (poll->wqh)
> > > -            remove_wait_queue(poll->wqh, &poll->wait);
> > > +        vhost_poll_stop(poll);
> > >         ret = -EINVAL;
> > >     }
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > 2.7.4
> > > 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-27 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-27  3:47 [PATCH net] vhost: correctly remove wait queue during poll failure Jason Wang
2018-03-27  9:28 ` Darren Kenny
2018-03-27  9:43   ` Jason Wang
2018-03-27  9:43   ` Jason Wang
2018-03-27 13:58     ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2018-03-27 13:58       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-03-27  3:47 Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180327165330-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.