From: Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com (Jisheng Zhang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] net: mvneta: split rxq/txq init into SW and HW parts
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 17:04:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180330170413.73320f7f@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180329134259.3fe6165b@windsurf>
Hi,
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:42:59 +0200 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 18:13:56 +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > This is to prepare the suspend/resume improvement in next patch. The
> > SW parts can be optimized out during resume.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
>
> Thanks, I have two very minor nits below, but otherwise:
>
> Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Thanks for reviewing.
>
> > +/* Create a specified RX queue */
> > +static int mvneta_rxq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> > + struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
> > +
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = mvneta_rxq_sw_init(pp, rxq);
> > + if (ret)
>
> Here you're testing if (ret), while in mvneta_txq_init(), in the same
> situation, you're doing if (ret < 0). I don't have a preference for one
> or the other, but having them consistent between the two lpaces would
> be nice.
updated in v2.
>
> > -/* Create and initialize a tx queue */
> > -static int mvneta_txq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> > - struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq)
> > +static int mvneta_txq_sw_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> > + struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq)
> > {
> > int cpu;
> >
> > @@ -2872,7 +2889,6 @@ static int mvneta_txq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> > txq->tx_stop_threshold = txq->size - MVNETA_MAX_SKB_DESCS;
> > txq->tx_wake_threshold = txq->tx_stop_threshold / 2;
> >
> > -
>
> Spurious change.
There's an extra blank line here, so I removed it ;)
Thanks
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: mvneta: split rxq/txq init into SW and HW parts
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 17:04:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180330170413.73320f7f@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180329134259.3fe6165b@windsurf>
Hi,
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:42:59 +0200 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 18:13:56 +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > This is to prepare the suspend/resume improvement in next patch. The
> > SW parts can be optimized out during resume.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
>
> Thanks, I have two very minor nits below, but otherwise:
>
> Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Thanks for reviewing.
>
> > +/* Create a specified RX queue */
> > +static int mvneta_rxq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> > + struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
> > +
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = mvneta_rxq_sw_init(pp, rxq);
> > + if (ret)
>
> Here you're testing if (ret), while in mvneta_txq_init(), in the same
> situation, you're doing if (ret < 0). I don't have a preference for one
> or the other, but having them consistent between the two lpaces would
> be nice.
updated in v2.
>
> > -/* Create and initialize a tx queue */
> > -static int mvneta_txq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> > - struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq)
> > +static int mvneta_txq_sw_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> > + struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq)
> > {
> > int cpu;
> >
> > @@ -2872,7 +2889,6 @@ static int mvneta_txq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> > txq->tx_stop_threshold = txq->size - MVNETA_MAX_SKB_DESCS;
> > txq->tx_wake_threshold = txq->tx_stop_threshold / 2;
> >
> > -
>
> Spurious change.
There's an extra blank line here, so I removed it ;)
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-30 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-29 10:12 [PATCH 0/2] net: mvneta: improve suspend/resume Jisheng Zhang
2018-03-29 10:12 ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-03-29 10:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] net: mvneta: split rxq/txq init into SW and HW parts Jisheng Zhang
2018-03-29 10:13 ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-03-29 11:42 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-03-29 11:42 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-03-30 9:04 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2018-03-30 9:04 ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-03-29 10:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: mvneta: improve suspend/resume Jisheng Zhang
2018-03-29 10:15 ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-03-29 11:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-03-29 11:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-03-30 9:15 ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-03-30 9:15 ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-03-30 9:49 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-03-30 9:49 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180330170413.73320f7f@xhacker.debian \
--to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.