From: Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com (Jisheng Zhang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] net: mvneta: improve suspend/resume
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 11:24:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180402112500.4b58058d@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180402112229.508e1feb@xhacker.debian>
Current suspend/resume implementation reuses the mvneta_open() and
mvneta_close(), but it could be optimized to take only necessary
actions during suspend/resume.
One obvious problem of current implementation is: after hundreds of
system suspend/resume cycles, the resume of mvneta could fail due to
fragmented dma coherent memory. After this patch, the non-necessary
memory alloc/free is optimized out.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index f96815853108..8999a9a52ca2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
@@ -4586,16 +4586,45 @@ static int mvneta_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
static int mvneta_suspend(struct device *device)
{
+ int queue;
struct net_device *dev = dev_get_drvdata(device);
struct mvneta_port *pp = netdev_priv(dev);
+ if (!netif_running(dev))
+ goto clean_exit;
+
+ if (!pp->neta_armada3700) {
+ spin_lock(&pp->lock);
+ pp->is_stopped = true;
+ spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
+
+ cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(online_hpstate,
+ &pp->node_online);
+ cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_NET_MVNETA_DEAD,
+ &pp->node_dead);
+ }
+
rtnl_lock();
- if (netif_running(dev))
- mvneta_stop(dev);
+ mvneta_stop_dev(pp);
rtnl_unlock();
+
+ for (queue = 0; queue < rxq_number; queue++) {
+ struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq = &pp->rxqs[queue];
+
+ mvneta_rxq_drop_pkts(pp, rxq);
+ }
+
+ for (queue = 0; queue < txq_number; queue++) {
+ struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq = &pp->txqs[queue];
+
+ mvneta_txq_hw_deinit(pp, txq);
+ }
+
+clean_exit:
netif_device_detach(dev);
clk_disable_unprepare(pp->clk_bus);
clk_disable_unprepare(pp->clk);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -4604,7 +4633,7 @@ static int mvneta_resume(struct device *device)
struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(device);
struct net_device *dev = dev_get_drvdata(device);
struct mvneta_port *pp = netdev_priv(dev);
- int err;
+ int err, queue;
clk_prepare_enable(pp->clk);
if (!IS_ERR(pp->clk_bus))
@@ -4626,12 +4655,38 @@ static int mvneta_resume(struct device *device)
}
netif_device_attach(dev);
- rtnl_lock();
- if (netif_running(dev)) {
- mvneta_open(dev);
- mvneta_set_rx_mode(dev);
+
+ if (!netif_running(dev))
+ return 0;
+
+ for (queue = 0; queue < rxq_number; queue++) {
+ struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq = &pp->rxqs[queue];
+
+ rxq->next_desc_to_proc = 0;
+ mvneta_rxq_hw_init(pp, rxq);
+ }
+
+ for (queue = 0; queue < txq_number; queue++) {
+ struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq = &pp->txqs[queue];
+
+ txq->next_desc_to_proc = 0;
+ mvneta_txq_hw_init(pp, txq);
}
+
+ if (!pp->neta_armada3700) {
+ spin_lock(&pp->lock);
+ pp->is_stopped = false;
+ spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
+ cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(online_hpstate,
+ &pp->node_online);
+ cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_NET_MVNETA_DEAD,
+ &pp->node_dead);
+ }
+
+ rtnl_lock();
+ mvneta_start_dev(pp);
rtnl_unlock();
+ mvneta_set_rx_mode(dev);
return 0;
}
--
2.16.3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] net: mvneta: improve suspend/resume
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 11:24:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180402112500.4b58058d@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180402112229.508e1feb@xhacker.debian>
Current suspend/resume implementation reuses the mvneta_open() and
mvneta_close(), but it could be optimized to take only necessary
actions during suspend/resume.
One obvious problem of current implementation is: after hundreds of
system suspend/resume cycles, the resume of mvneta could fail due to
fragmented dma coherent memory. After this patch, the non-necessary
memory alloc/free is optimized out.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index f96815853108..8999a9a52ca2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
@@ -4586,16 +4586,45 @@ static int mvneta_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
static int mvneta_suspend(struct device *device)
{
+ int queue;
struct net_device *dev = dev_get_drvdata(device);
struct mvneta_port *pp = netdev_priv(dev);
+ if (!netif_running(dev))
+ goto clean_exit;
+
+ if (!pp->neta_armada3700) {
+ spin_lock(&pp->lock);
+ pp->is_stopped = true;
+ spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
+
+ cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(online_hpstate,
+ &pp->node_online);
+ cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_NET_MVNETA_DEAD,
+ &pp->node_dead);
+ }
+
rtnl_lock();
- if (netif_running(dev))
- mvneta_stop(dev);
+ mvneta_stop_dev(pp);
rtnl_unlock();
+
+ for (queue = 0; queue < rxq_number; queue++) {
+ struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq = &pp->rxqs[queue];
+
+ mvneta_rxq_drop_pkts(pp, rxq);
+ }
+
+ for (queue = 0; queue < txq_number; queue++) {
+ struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq = &pp->txqs[queue];
+
+ mvneta_txq_hw_deinit(pp, txq);
+ }
+
+clean_exit:
netif_device_detach(dev);
clk_disable_unprepare(pp->clk_bus);
clk_disable_unprepare(pp->clk);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -4604,7 +4633,7 @@ static int mvneta_resume(struct device *device)
struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(device);
struct net_device *dev = dev_get_drvdata(device);
struct mvneta_port *pp = netdev_priv(dev);
- int err;
+ int err, queue;
clk_prepare_enable(pp->clk);
if (!IS_ERR(pp->clk_bus))
@@ -4626,12 +4655,38 @@ static int mvneta_resume(struct device *device)
}
netif_device_attach(dev);
- rtnl_lock();
- if (netif_running(dev)) {
- mvneta_open(dev);
- mvneta_set_rx_mode(dev);
+
+ if (!netif_running(dev))
+ return 0;
+
+ for (queue = 0; queue < rxq_number; queue++) {
+ struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq = &pp->rxqs[queue];
+
+ rxq->next_desc_to_proc = 0;
+ mvneta_rxq_hw_init(pp, rxq);
+ }
+
+ for (queue = 0; queue < txq_number; queue++) {
+ struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq = &pp->txqs[queue];
+
+ txq->next_desc_to_proc = 0;
+ mvneta_txq_hw_init(pp, txq);
}
+
+ if (!pp->neta_armada3700) {
+ spin_lock(&pp->lock);
+ pp->is_stopped = false;
+ spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
+ cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(online_hpstate,
+ &pp->node_online);
+ cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_NET_MVNETA_DEAD,
+ &pp->node_dead);
+ }
+
+ rtnl_lock();
+ mvneta_start_dev(pp);
rtnl_unlock();
+ mvneta_set_rx_mode(dev);
return 0;
}
--
2.16.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-02 3:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-02 3:22 [PATCH v3 0/2] net: mvneta: improve suspend/resume Jisheng Zhang
2018-04-02 3:22 ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-04-02 3:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] net: mvneta: split rxq/txq init and txq deinit into SW and HW parts Jisheng Zhang
2018-04-02 3:23 ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-04-02 3:24 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2018-04-02 3:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] net: mvneta: improve suspend/resume Jisheng Zhang
2018-04-02 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " David Miller
2018-04-02 15:14 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180402112500.4b58058d@xhacker.debian \
--to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.