All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, grygorii.strashko@ti.com,
	t-kristo@ti.com, Russ.Dill@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ssantosh@kernel.org,
	haojian.zhuang@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	d-gerlach@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] gpio: omap: Drop the concept of gpio banks not being able to lose context.
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 07:22:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180412142257.GW5700@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523505239-16229-11-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com>

* Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> [180412 03:56]:
> From: Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@ti.com>
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ struct gpio_bank {
>  	bool dbck_enabled;
>  	bool is_mpuio;
>  	bool dbck_flag;
> -	bool loses_context;
> +
>  	bool context_valid;
>  	int stride;
>  	u32 width;

For some SoCs GPIO bank1 won't lose the context ever. So I'd like to
keep loses_context flag around to avoid pointless save and restore.
But maybe this still happens with get_context_loss_count and I'm
misreading this patch?

However..

> @@ -1198,15 +1198,9 @@ static int omap_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
>  	bank->chip.of_node = of_node_get(node);
>  #endif
> -	if (node) {
> -		if (!of_property_read_bool(node, "ti,gpio-always-on"))
> -			bank->loses_context = true;
> -	} else {
> -		bank->loses_context = pdata->loses_context;
> -
> -		if (bank->loses_context)
> -			bank->get_context_loss_count =
> -				pdata->get_context_loss_count;
> +	if (!node) {
> +		bank->get_context_loss_count =
> +			pdata->get_context_loss_count;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (bank->regs->set_dataout && bank->regs->clr_dataout)

.. I do have a patch ready here that I'll post after -rc1 to remove
CONFIG_OMAP_PM_NOOP related stuff, turns out that's noop anyways :)

So yeah the pdata->get_context_loss_count parts are noop and can
be just removed.

Regards,

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/14] gpio: omap: Drop the concept of gpio banks not being able to lose context.
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 07:22:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180412142257.GW5700@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523505239-16229-11-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com>

* Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> [180412 03:56]:
> From: Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@ti.com>
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ struct gpio_bank {
>  	bool dbck_enabled;
>  	bool is_mpuio;
>  	bool dbck_flag;
> -	bool loses_context;
> +
>  	bool context_valid;
>  	int stride;
>  	u32 width;

For some SoCs GPIO bank1 won't lose the context ever. So I'd like to
keep loses_context flag around to avoid pointless save and restore.
But maybe this still happens with get_context_loss_count and I'm
misreading this patch?

However..

> @@ -1198,15 +1198,9 @@ static int omap_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
>  	bank->chip.of_node = of_node_get(node);
>  #endif
> -	if (node) {
> -		if (!of_property_read_bool(node, "ti,gpio-always-on"))
> -			bank->loses_context = true;
> -	} else {
> -		bank->loses_context = pdata->loses_context;
> -
> -		if (bank->loses_context)
> -			bank->get_context_loss_count =
> -				pdata->get_context_loss_count;
> +	if (!node) {
> +		bank->get_context_loss_count =
> +			pdata->get_context_loss_count;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (bank->regs->set_dataout && bank->regs->clr_dataout)

.. I do have a patch ready here that I'll post after -rc1 to remove
CONFIG_OMAP_PM_NOOP related stuff, turns out that's noop anyways :)

So yeah the pdata->get_context_loss_count parts are noop and can
be just removed.

Regards,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-12 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-12  3:53 [PATCH 00/14] arm: OMAP: AM437X: Save restores patches for rtc mode with DDR In self-refresh Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53 ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53 ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53 ` [PATCH 01/14] memory: ti-emif-sram: Add resume function to recopy sram code Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12 16:44   ` santosh.shilimkar
2018-04-12 16:44     ` santosh.shilimkar
2018-04-12 16:44     ` santosh.shilimkar at oracle.com
2018-04-16 10:20     ` Keerthy
2018-04-16 10:20       ` Keerthy
2018-04-16 10:20       ` Keerthy
2018-04-16 10:29     ` Keerthy
2018-04-16 10:29       ` Keerthy
2018-04-16 10:29       ` Keerthy
2018-05-23  8:47       ` Keerthy
2018-05-23  8:47         ` Keerthy
2018-05-23  8:47         ` Keerthy
2018-05-23 16:42         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2018-05-23 16:42           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2018-04-12  3:53 ` [PATCH 02/14] ARM: OMAP2: Add functions to save and restore clockdomain context en-masse Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53 ` [PATCH 03/14] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_hwmod: Introduce HWMOD_NEEDS_REIDLE Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12 14:34   ` Tony Lindgren
2018-04-12 14:34     ` Tony Lindgren
2018-04-12  3:53 ` [PATCH 04/14] ARM: OMAP2: Add functions to save and restore omap hwmod context en-masse Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53 ` [PATCH 05/14] ARM: OMAP2: Add functions to save and restore powerdomain context Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12 14:37   ` Tony Lindgren
2018-04-12 14:37     ` Tony Lindgren
2018-04-12  3:53 ` [PATCH 06/14] ARM: AM33XX: Add functions to save/restore am33xx control registers Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53 ` [PATCH 07/14] ARM: AM43XX: Add functions to save/restore am43xx " Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53 ` [PATCH 08/14] ARM: OMAP2: Add functions to save and restore pinctrl context Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12 14:16   ` Tony Lindgren
2018-04-12 14:16     ` Tony Lindgren
2018-04-13  6:16     ` Keerthy
2018-04-13  6:16       ` Keerthy
2018-04-13  6:16       ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53 ` [PATCH 09/14] ARM: OMAP2: Drop the concept of certain power domains not being able to lose context Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53 ` [PATCH 10/14] gpio: omap: Drop the concept of gpio banks " Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12 14:22   ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2018-04-12 14:22     ` Tony Lindgren
2018-04-12 20:10     ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-04-12 20:10       ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-04-12 20:10       ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-04-12  3:53 ` [PATCH 11/14] gpio: omap: Restore power_mode configuration at resume time Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12 14:39   ` Tony Lindgren
2018-04-12 14:39     ` Tony Lindgren
2018-04-12 20:02     ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-04-12 20:02       ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-04-12 20:02       ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-04-12  3:53 ` [PATCH 12/14] OMAP: CLK: CLKSRC: Add suspend resume hooks Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12 14:27   ` Tony Lindgren
2018-04-12 14:27     ` Tony Lindgren
2018-05-22  7:57     ` Keerthy
2018-05-22  7:57       ` Keerthy
2018-05-22  7:57       ` Keerthy
2018-05-22 13:39       ` Tony Lindgren
2018-05-22 13:39         ` Tony Lindgren
2018-04-12  3:53 ` [PATCH 13/14] ARM: hwmod: RTC: Don't assume lock/unlock will be called with irq enabled Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53 ` [PATCH 14/14] ARM: OMAP2+: prm44xx: Introduce context save/restore for am43 PRCM IO Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy
2018-04-12  3:53   ` Keerthy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180412142257.GW5700@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=Russ.Dill@ti.com \
    --cc=d-gerlach@ti.com \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=haojian.zhuang@linaro.org \
    --cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.