All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 20:35:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180412173558.GB31781@altlinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxdg2bYHtbKXb4mT5UuP2GH_qjkc=WeZY-RYHWZFQ2Gng@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2526 bytes --]

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:50:26AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Does this attached patch perhaps fix the ARM case?
> 
> It just uses FPE_FLTUNK as the default si_code for SIGFPE, which seems
> sane enough. And then gets rid of FPE_FIXME, which should resolve the
> nasty case.
> 
> Hmm? Entirely untested, and I didn't really look at the test-case in
> question since I can't really run it anyway.
> 
> Well, I could run it all on x86-64, but it doesn't have that FPE_FIXME
> case at all.
> 
>                  Linus

>  arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h | 7 -------
>  arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c            | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> index d0513880be21..d87beeedb4c4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> @@ -3,11 +3,4 @@
>  
>  #include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
>  
> -/*
> - * SIGFPE si_codes
> - */
> -#ifdef __KERNEL__
> -#define FPE_FIXME	0	/* Broken dup of SI_USER */
> -#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> -
>  #endif

Looks like the whole file should go away.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
> index 4c375e11ae95..012c6e690303 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
> @@ -251,13 +251,13 @@ static void vfp_panic(char *reason, u32 inst)
>   */
>  static void vfp_raise_exceptions(u32 exceptions, u32 inst, u32 fpscr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> -	int si_code = 0;
> +	int si_code = FPE_FLTUNK;

Note that this change would affect the following code
at the end of vfp_raise_exceptions:

	if (si_code)
		vfp_raise_sigfpe(si_code, regs);

>  	pr_debug("VFP: raising exceptions %08x\n", exceptions);
>  
>  	if (exceptions == VFP_EXCEPTION_ERROR) {
>  		vfp_panic("unhandled bounce", inst);
> -		vfp_raise_sigfpe(FPE_FIXME, regs);
> +		vfp_raise_sigfpe(si_code, regs);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  

To be on the safe side, I'd just change it this way:

diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
index 4c375e1..66a73ba 100644
--- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
+++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static void vfp_raise_exceptions(u32 exceptions, u32 inst, u32 fpscr, struct pt_
 
 	if (exceptions == VFP_EXCEPTION_ERROR) {
 		vfp_panic("unhandled bounce", inst);
-		vfp_raise_sigfpe(FPE_FIXME, regs);
+		vfp_raise_sigfpe(FPE_FLTUNK, regs);
 		return;
 	}

-- 
ldv

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 17:35:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180412173558.GB31781@altlinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxdg2bYHtbKXb4mT5UuP2GH_qjkc=WeZY-RYHWZFQ2Gng@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2526 bytes --]

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:50:26AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Does this attached patch perhaps fix the ARM case?
> 
> It just uses FPE_FLTUNK as the default si_code for SIGFPE, which seems
> sane enough. And then gets rid of FPE_FIXME, which should resolve the
> nasty case.
> 
> Hmm? Entirely untested, and I didn't really look at the test-case in
> question since I can't really run it anyway.
> 
> Well, I could run it all on x86-64, but it doesn't have that FPE_FIXME
> case at all.
> 
>                  Linus

>  arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h | 7 -------
>  arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c            | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> index d0513880be21..d87beeedb4c4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> @@ -3,11 +3,4 @@
>  
>  #include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
>  
> -/*
> - * SIGFPE si_codes
> - */
> -#ifdef __KERNEL__
> -#define FPE_FIXME	0	/* Broken dup of SI_USER */
> -#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> -
>  #endif

Looks like the whole file should go away.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
> index 4c375e11ae95..012c6e690303 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
> @@ -251,13 +251,13 @@ static void vfp_panic(char *reason, u32 inst)
>   */
>  static void vfp_raise_exceptions(u32 exceptions, u32 inst, u32 fpscr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> -	int si_code = 0;
> +	int si_code = FPE_FLTUNK;

Note that this change would affect the following code
at the end of vfp_raise_exceptions:

	if (si_code)
		vfp_raise_sigfpe(si_code, regs);

>  	pr_debug("VFP: raising exceptions %08x\n", exceptions);
>  
>  	if (exceptions == VFP_EXCEPTION_ERROR) {
>  		vfp_panic("unhandled bounce", inst);
> -		vfp_raise_sigfpe(FPE_FIXME, regs);
> +		vfp_raise_sigfpe(si_code, regs);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  

To be on the safe side, I'd just change it this way:

diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
index 4c375e1..66a73ba 100644
--- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
+++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static void vfp_raise_exceptions(u32 exceptions, u32 inst, u32 fpscr, struct pt_
 
 	if (exceptions == VFP_EXCEPTION_ERROR) {
 		vfp_panic("unhandled bounce", inst);
-		vfp_raise_sigfpe(FPE_FIXME, regs);
+		vfp_raise_sigfpe(FPE_FLTUNK, regs);
 		return;
 	}

-- 
ldv

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ldv@altlinux.org (Dmitry V. Levin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 20:35:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180412173558.GB31781@altlinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxdg2bYHtbKXb4mT5UuP2GH_qjkc=WeZY-RYHWZFQ2Gng@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:50:26AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Does this attached patch perhaps fix the ARM case?
> 
> It just uses FPE_FLTUNK as the default si_code for SIGFPE, which seems
> sane enough. And then gets rid of FPE_FIXME, which should resolve the
> nasty case.
> 
> Hmm? Entirely untested, and I didn't really look at the test-case in
> question since I can't really run it anyway.
> 
> Well, I could run it all on x86-64, but it doesn't have that FPE_FIXME
> case at all.
> 
>                  Linus

>  arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h | 7 -------
>  arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c            | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> index d0513880be21..d87beeedb4c4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> @@ -3,11 +3,4 @@
>  
>  #include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
>  
> -/*
> - * SIGFPE si_codes
> - */
> -#ifdef __KERNEL__
> -#define FPE_FIXME	0	/* Broken dup of SI_USER */
> -#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> -
>  #endif

Looks like the whole file should go away.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
> index 4c375e11ae95..012c6e690303 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
> @@ -251,13 +251,13 @@ static void vfp_panic(char *reason, u32 inst)
>   */
>  static void vfp_raise_exceptions(u32 exceptions, u32 inst, u32 fpscr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> -	int si_code = 0;
> +	int si_code = FPE_FLTUNK;

Note that this change would affect the following code
at the end of vfp_raise_exceptions:

	if (si_code)
		vfp_raise_sigfpe(si_code, regs);

>  	pr_debug("VFP: raising exceptions %08x\n", exceptions);
>  
>  	if (exceptions == VFP_EXCEPTION_ERROR) {
>  		vfp_panic("unhandled bounce", inst);
> -		vfp_raise_sigfpe(FPE_FIXME, regs);
> +		vfp_raise_sigfpe(si_code, regs);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  

To be on the safe side, I'd just change it this way:

diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
index 4c375e1..66a73ba 100644
--- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
+++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static void vfp_raise_exceptions(u32 exceptions, u32 inst, u32 fpscr, struct pt_
 
 	if (exceptions == VFP_EXCEPTION_ERROR) {
 		vfp_panic("unhandled bounce", inst);
-		vfp_raise_sigfpe(FPE_FIXME, regs);
+		vfp_raise_sigfpe(FPE_FLTUNK, regs);
 		return;
 	}

-- 
ldv
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180412/8a5a5062/attachment.sig>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-12 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-09 15:22 ppc compat v4.16 regression: sending SIGTRAP or SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Dmitry V. Levin
2018-04-12  1:34 ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending " Dmitry V. Levin
2018-04-12  1:34   ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-04-12  1:45   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-12  1:45     ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-12  9:58   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-12  9:58     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-12 11:03     ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-04-12 11:03       ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-04-12 11:03       ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Dmitry V. Levin
2018-04-12 12:19       ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-12 12:19         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-12 12:19         ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-12 12:49         ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Dmitry V. Levin
2018-04-12 12:49           ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-04-12 12:49           ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Dmitry V. Levin
2018-04-12 13:14           ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-12 13:14             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-12 13:14             ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-12 16:50             ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Linus Torvalds
2018-04-12 16:50               ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-12 16:50               ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Linus Torvalds
2018-04-12 17:20               ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-12 17:20                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-12 17:20                 ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-12 17:22                 ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Linus Torvalds
2018-04-12 17:22                   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-12 17:22                   ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Linus Torvalds
2018-04-13  9:42                   ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-13  9:42                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-13  9:42                     ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-13 16:33                     ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Linus Torvalds
2018-04-13 16:33                       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-13 16:33                       ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Linus Torvalds
2018-04-13 17:08                       ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Dave Martin
2018-04-13 17:08                         ` Dave Martin
2018-04-13 17:08                         ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Dave Martin
2018-04-13 17:54                         ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-13 17:54                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-13 17:54                           ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-13 18:23                           ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Linus Torvalds
2018-04-13 18:23                             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-13 18:23                             ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Linus Torvalds
2018-04-13 18:45                             ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Dave Martin
2018-04-13 18:45                               ` Dave Martin
2018-04-13 18:45                               ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Dave Martin
2018-04-13 19:53                               ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Linus Torvalds
2018-04-13 19:53                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-13 19:53                                 ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Linus Torvalds
2018-04-15 13:12                                 ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-15 13:12                                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-15 13:12                                   ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-15 15:22                                   ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:22                                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:22                                     ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:56                                   ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Dealing with the aliases of SI_USER Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:56                                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:56                                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:56                                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:57                                     ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] signal: Ensure every siginfo we send has all bits initialized Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:57                                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:57                                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:57                                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-17 13:23                                       ` Dave Martin
2018-04-17 13:23                                         ` Dave Martin
2018-04-17 13:23                                         ` Dave Martin
2018-04-17 19:37                                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-17 19:37                                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-17 19:37                                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-18 12:47                                           ` Dave Martin
2018-04-18 12:47                                             ` Dave Martin
2018-04-18 12:47                                             ` Dave Martin
2018-04-18 14:22                                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-18 14:22                                               ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-18 14:22                                               ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-19  8:26                                               ` Dave Martin
2018-04-19  8:26                                                 ` Dave Martin
2018-04-19  8:26                                                 ` Dave Martin
2018-04-15 15:58                                     ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] signal: Reduce copy_siginfo_to_user to just copy_to_user Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:58                                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:58                                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:58                                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:59                                     ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] signal: Stop special casing TRAP_FIXME and FPE_FIXME in siginfo_layout Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:59                                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:59                                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 15:59                                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-15 18:16                                     ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Dealing with the aliases of SI_USER Linus Torvalds
2018-04-15 18:16                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-15 18:16                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-16  2:03                                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-16  2:03                                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-16  2:03                                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-18 17:58                                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-18 17:58                                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-18 17:58                                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-18 17:58                                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-18 17:58                                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-19  9:28                                       ` Dave Martin
2018-04-19  9:28                                         ` Dave Martin
2018-04-19  9:28                                         ` Dave Martin
2018-04-19 14:40                                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-19 14:40                                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-19 14:40                                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-13 18:35                           ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Dave Martin
2018-04-13 18:35                             ` Dave Martin
2018-04-13 18:35                             ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Dave Martin
2018-04-13 18:50                             ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-13 18:50                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-13 18:50                               ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-13 18:56                               ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Dave Martin
2018-04-13 18:56                                 ` Dave Martin
2018-04-13 18:56                                 ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Dave Martin
2018-04-12 17:35               ` Dmitry V. Levin [this message]
2018-04-12 17:35                 ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in si_pid and si_uid Dmitry V. Levin
2018-04-12 17:35                 ` sparc/ppc/arm compat siginfo ABI regressions: sending SIGFPE via kill() returns wrong values in Dmitry V. Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180412173558.GB31781@altlinux.org \
    --to=ldv@altlinux.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.