From: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterhuewe@gmx.de,
jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com, tpmdd@selhorst.net,
jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com, patrickc@us.ibm.com,
Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] tpm: improving granularity in poll sleep times
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:12:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180417131246.434-1-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
The existing TPM polling code sleeps in each loop iteration for time in
msecs ranging from 1 msecs to 5 msecs. However, many of the TPM commands
complete much faster, resulting in unnecessary delays.
This set of patches identifies such iterations and optimizes the sleep
time. The first patch replaces TPM_POLL_SLEEP with TPM_TIMEOUT_POLL and
moves it from tpm_tis_core.c to tpm.h as an enum with value 1 msecs. The
second patch further reduces the TPM poll sleep time in get_burstcount()
and wait_for_tpm_stat() in tpm_tis_core.c by calling usleep_range()
directly.
The change is only in the polling time, and the maximum timeout is still
maintained the same. Thus, it should not affect the overall existing
behavior.
Changelog:
v2:
tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit()
* merged previously defined two patches into this.
* updated patch description as per Jarkko's feedback
tpm: reduce polling time to usecs for even finer granularity
* directly use usleep_range with finer granularity less than 1msec
Nayna Jain (2):
tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit()
tpm: reduce polling time to usecs for even finer granularity
drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 2 +-
drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 5 ++++-
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 11 +++--------
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
2.13.3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Nayna Jain)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] tpm: improving granularity in poll sleep times
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:12:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180417131246.434-1-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
The existing TPM polling code sleeps in each loop iteration for time in
msecs ranging from 1 msecs to 5 msecs. However, many of the TPM commands
complete much faster, resulting in unnecessary delays.
This set of patches identifies such iterations and optimizes the sleep
time. The first patch replaces TPM_POLL_SLEEP with TPM_TIMEOUT_POLL and
moves it from tpm_tis_core.c to tpm.h as an enum with value 1 msecs. The
second patch further reduces the TPM poll sleep time in get_burstcount()
and wait_for_tpm_stat() in tpm_tis_core.c by calling usleep_range()
directly.
The change is only in the polling time, and the maximum timeout is still
maintained the same. Thus, it should not affect the overall existing
behavior.
Changelog:
v2:
tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit()
* merged previously defined two patches into this.
* updated patch description as per Jarkko's feedback
tpm: reduce polling time to usecs for even finer granularity
* directly use usleep_range with finer granularity less than 1msec
Nayna Jain (2):
tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit()
tpm: reduce polling time to usecs for even finer granularity
drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 2 +-
drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 5 ++++-
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 11 +++--------
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
2.13.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2018-04-17 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-17 13:12 Nayna Jain [this message]
2018-04-17 13:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] tpm: improving granularity in poll sleep times Nayna Jain
2018-04-17 13:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit() Nayna Jain
2018-04-17 13:12 ` Nayna Jain
2018-04-18 15:01 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-04-18 15:01 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-04-24 16:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-04-24 16:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-04-17 13:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] tpm: reduce polling time to usecs for even finer granularity Nayna Jain
2018-04-17 13:12 ` Nayna Jain
2018-04-18 15:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-04-18 15:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-04-24 16:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-04-24 16:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180417131246.434-1-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patrickc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=tpmdd@selhorst.net \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.