From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Amit Shah <amit@kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] virtio_console: don't tie bufs to a vq
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:50:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180425055016.GD30843@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180424215318-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:56:33PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 09:30:05AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 09:18:01PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > an allocated buffer doesn't need to be tied to a vq -
> > > only vq->vdev is ever used. Pass the function the
> > > just what it needs - the vdev.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 14 +++++++-------
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> > > index 468f061..3e56f32 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> > > @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ static void reclaim_dma_bufs(void)
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, size_t buf_size,
> > > +static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(struct virtio_device *vdev, size_t buf_size,
> > > int pages)
> > > {
> > > struct port_buffer *buf;
> > > @@ -445,16 +445,16 @@ static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, size_t buf_size,
> > > return buf;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (is_rproc_serial(vq->vdev)) {
> > > + if (is_rproc_serial(vdev)) {
> > > /*
> > > * Allocate DMA memory from ancestor. When a virtio
> > > * device is created by remoteproc, the DMA memory is
> > > * associated with the grandparent device:
> > > * vdev => rproc => platform-dev.
> > > */
> > > - if (!vq->vdev->dev.parent || !vq->vdev->dev.parent->parent)
> > > + if (!vdev->dev.parent || !vdev->dev.parent->parent)
> > > goto free_buf;
> > > - buf->dev = vq->vdev->dev.parent->parent;
> > > + buf->dev = vdev->dev.parent->parent;
> > >
> > > /* Increase device refcnt to avoid freeing it */
> > > get_device(buf->dev);
> > > @@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ static ssize_t port_fops_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
> > >
> > > count = min((size_t)(32 * 1024), count);
> > >
> > > - buf = alloc_buf(port->out_vq, count, 0);
> > > + buf = alloc_buf(port->portdev->vdev, count, 0);
> > > if (!buf)
> > > return -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > @@ -957,7 +957,7 @@ static ssize_t port_fops_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
> > > if (ret < 0)
> > > goto error_out;
> > >
> > > - buf = alloc_buf(port->out_vq, 0, pipe->nrbufs);
> > > + buf = alloc_buf(port->portdev->vdev, 0, pipe->nrbufs);
> > > if (!buf) {
> > > ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > goto error_out;
> > > @@ -1374,7 +1374,7 @@ static unsigned int fill_queue(struct virtqueue *vq, spinlock_t *lock)
> > >
> > > nr_added_bufs = 0;
> > > do {
> > > - buf = alloc_buf(vq, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
> > > + buf = alloc_buf(vq->vdev, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
> > > if (!buf)
> > > break;
> > >
> > > --
> > > MST
> >
> > <formletter>
> >
> > This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
> > stable kernel tree. Please read:
> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
> > for how to do this properly.
> >
> > </formletter>
>
>
> Thanks!
> I have some questions about this one:
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3.x: a1f84a3: sched: Check for idle
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3.x: 1b9508f: sched: Rate-limit newidle
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3.x: fd21073: sched: Fix affinity logic
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3.x
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> 1. what does the kernel version mean? can I omit it?
Did you read the document?, it explains that the version can be used to
say "this kernel version and newer"
> 2. so when I rebase to add the tag, this changes commit IDs for
> following tags in the same tree, breaking their tags
> in the process. Pretty annoying. Any idea how to do it better?
You only put tags there if you want me to pick up pre-requisite patches
that are already in Linus's tree. If you have a patch series that all
needs to go into stable, just add the "cc: stable@" to the tags on all
of them and I'll pick them up in the correct order then.
hope this helps,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-25 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-20 18:18 [PATCH 0/6] virtio-console: spec compliance fixes Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-20 18:18 ` [PATCH 1/6] virtio_console: don't tie bufs to a vq Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-20 18:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-21 7:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-04-24 18:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-24 18:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-25 5:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-04-25 5:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2018-04-21 7:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-04-20 18:18 ` [PATCH 2/6] virtio: add ability to iterate over vqs Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-20 18:18 ` [PATCH 3/6] virtio_console: free buffers after reset Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-20 18:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-24 2:40 ` Jason Wang
2018-04-24 2:40 ` Jason Wang
2018-04-20 18:18 ` [PATCH 2/6] virtio: add ability to iterate over vqs Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-20 18:18 ` [PATCH 4/6] virtio_console: drop custom control queue cleanup Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-20 18:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-20 18:18 ` [PATCH 5/6] virtio_console: move removal code Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-20 18:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-20 18:18 ` [PATCH 6/6] virtio_console: reset on out of memory Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-20 18:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-24 18:41 ` [PATCH 0/6] virtio-console: spec compliance fixes Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-25 14:01 ` Amit Shah
2018-05-03 3:34 ` Amit Shah
2018-05-03 3:34 ` Amit Shah
2018-05-03 3:45 ` Amit Shah
2018-05-03 19:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-03 19:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-06 17:56 ` Amit Shah
2018-05-06 17:56 ` Amit Shah
2018-05-06 18:24 ` Amit Shah
2018-05-06 19:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-06 19:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-24 18:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180425055016.GD30843@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=amit@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.