From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: thor.thayer@linux.intel.com, mchehab@kernel.org,
robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [2/3] edac: altera: Add support for Stratix10 SDRAM EDAC
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:08:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180426060815.GA7931@pd.tnic> (raw)
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:14:27PM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> Does it make sense to have the support for this in separate files?
No. Per vendor or per uarch/processor type, standalone EDAC drivers are
fine. But not per the RAS capability of a functional unit.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: bp@alien8.de (Borislav Petkov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] edac: altera: Add support for Stratix10 SDRAM EDAC
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:08:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180426060815.GA7931@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2d310ff0-fa0e-e432-ae11-ba34080b4f6e@kernel.org>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:14:27PM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> Does it make sense to have the support for this in separate files?
No. Per vendor or per uarch/processor type, standalone EDAC drivers are
fine. But not per the RAS capability of a functional unit.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
thor.thayer@linux.intel.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will.deacon@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] edac: altera: Add support for Stratix10 SDRAM EDAC
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:08:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180426060815.GA7931@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2d310ff0-fa0e-e432-ae11-ba34080b4f6e@kernel.org>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:14:27PM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> Does it make sense to have the support for this in separate files?
No. Per vendor or per uarch/processor type, standalone EDAC drivers are
fine. But not per the RAS capability of a functional unit.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
next reply other threads:[~2018-04-26 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-26 6:08 Borislav Petkov [this message]
2018-04-26 6:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] edac: altera: Add support for Stratix10 SDRAM EDAC Borislav Petkov
2018-04-26 6:08 ` Borislav Petkov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-26 15:06 [1/3] Documentation: dt: socfpga: Add Stratix10 ECC Manager binding Rob Herring
2018-04-26 15:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Rob Herring
2018-04-26 15:06 ` Rob Herring
2018-04-26 15:01 [1/3] " Dinh Nguyen
2018-04-26 15:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Dinh Nguyen
2018-04-26 15:01 ` Dinh Nguyen
2018-04-26 14:58 [1/3] " thor.thayer
2018-04-26 14:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Thor Thayer
2018-04-26 14:58 ` Thor Thayer
2018-04-26 14:43 [1/3] " thor.thayer
2018-04-26 14:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Thor Thayer
2018-04-26 14:43 ` Thor Thayer
2018-04-26 14:42 [2/3] edac: altera: Add support for Stratix10 SDRAM EDAC thor.thayer
2018-04-26 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] " Thor Thayer
2018-04-26 14:42 ` Thor Thayer
2018-04-26 2:16 [1/3] Documentation: dt: socfpga: Add Stratix10 ECC Manager binding Dinh Nguyen
2018-04-26 2:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Dinh Nguyen
2018-04-26 2:16 ` Dinh Nguyen
2018-04-26 2:14 [2/3] edac: altera: Add support for Stratix10 SDRAM EDAC Dinh Nguyen
2018-04-26 2:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] " Dinh Nguyen
2018-04-26 2:14 ` Dinh Nguyen
2018-04-24 18:35 [3/3] arm64: dts: stratix10: add sdram ecc thor.thayer
2018-04-24 18:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] " thor.thayer
2018-04-24 18:35 ` thor.thayer at linux.intel.com
2018-04-24 18:35 [2/3] edac: altera: Add support for Stratix10 SDRAM EDAC thor.thayer
2018-04-24 18:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] " thor.thayer
2018-04-24 18:35 ` thor.thayer at linux.intel.com
2018-04-24 18:35 [1/3] Documentation: dt: socfpga: Add Stratix10 ECC Manager binding thor.thayer
2018-04-24 18:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] " thor.thayer
2018-04-24 18:35 ` thor.thayer at linux.intel.com
2018-04-24 18:35 [PATCH 0/3] Add SDRAM ECC support for Stratix10 thor.thayer at linux.intel.com
2018-04-24 18:35 ` thor.thayer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180426060815.GA7931@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=thor.thayer@linux.intel.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.