* [PATCH 0/3] Optimize use of DBuf slices
@ 2018-04-26 14:25 Mahesh Kumar
2018-04-26 14:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/icl: track dbuf slice-2 status Mahesh Kumar
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mahesh Kumar @ 2018-04-26 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: paulo.r.zanoni, lucas.demarchi, rodrigo.vivi
Patches in this series were originally part of series:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36993/
Reposting it here after rebase
use kernel types u8/u16 etc instead of uint8_t
Changes:
- Rebase the series
Mahesh Kumar (3):
drm/i915/icl: track dbuf slice-2 status
drm/i915/icl: Enable 2nd DBuf slice only when needed
drm/i915/icl: update ddb entry start/end mask during hw ddb readout
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 15 +++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 6 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++-----
6 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
--
2.16.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/icl: track dbuf slice-2 status 2018-04-26 14:25 [PATCH 0/3] Optimize use of DBuf slices Mahesh Kumar @ 2018-04-26 14:25 ` Mahesh Kumar 2018-04-26 14:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/icl: Enable 2nd DBuf slice only when needed Mahesh Kumar ` (5 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Mahesh Kumar @ 2018-04-26 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx; +Cc: paulo.r.zanoni, lucas.demarchi, rodrigo.vivi This patch adds support to start tracking status of DBUF slices. This is foundation to introduce support for enabling/disabling second DBUF slice dynamically for ICL. Changes Since V1: - use kernel type u8 over uint8_t Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com> Reviewed-by: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 5 +++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 4 ++++ 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 8444ca8d5aa3..193176bcddf5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h @@ -1189,6 +1189,7 @@ struct skl_ddb_allocation { /* packed/y */ struct skl_ddb_entry plane[I915_MAX_PIPES][I915_MAX_PLANES]; struct skl_ddb_entry uv_plane[I915_MAX_PIPES][I915_MAX_PLANES]; + u8 enabled_slices; /* GEN11 has configurable 2 slices */ }; struct skl_ddb_values { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 09e96d547c01..e5ad95d0af1b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -11445,6 +11445,11 @@ static void verify_wm_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc, skl_ddb_get_hw_state(dev_priv, &hw_ddb); sw_ddb = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb; + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) + if (hw_ddb.enabled_slices != sw_ddb->enabled_slices) + DRM_ERROR("mismatch in DBUF Slices (expected %u, got %u)\n", + sw_ddb->enabled_slices, + hw_ddb.enabled_slices); /* planes */ for_each_universal_plane(dev_priv, pipe, plane) { hw_plane_wm = &hw_wm.planes[plane]; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index 4baab858e442..a29e6d512771 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -3567,6 +3567,23 @@ bool ilk_disable_lp_wm(struct drm_device *dev) return _ilk_disable_lp_wm(dev_priv, WM_DIRTY_LP_ALL); } +static u8 intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_num(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +{ + u8 enabled_slices; + + /* Slice 1 will always be enabled */ + enabled_slices = 1; + + /* Gen prior to GEN11 have only one DBuf slice */ + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11) + return enabled_slices; + + if (I915_READ(DBUF_CTL_S2) & DBUF_POWER_STATE) + enabled_slices++; + + return enabled_slices; +} + /* * FIXME: We still don't have the proper code detect if we need to apply the WA, * so assume we'll always need it in order to avoid underruns. @@ -3870,6 +3887,8 @@ void skl_ddb_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, memset(ddb, 0, sizeof(*ddb)); + ddb->enabled_slices = intel_enabled_dbuf_slices_num(dev_priv); + for_each_intel_crtc(&dev_priv->drm, crtc) { enum intel_display_power_domain power_domain; enum plane_id plane_id; @@ -5088,6 +5107,7 @@ skl_copy_ddb_for_pipe(struct skl_ddb_values *dst, sizeof(dst->ddb.uv_plane[pipe])); memcpy(dst->ddb.plane[pipe], src->ddb.plane[pipe], sizeof(dst->ddb.plane[pipe])); + dst->ddb.enabled_slices = src->ddb.enabled_slices; } static void diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c index ec59992cf87a..afc6ef81ca0c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c @@ -2656,6 +2656,8 @@ static void icl_dbuf_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) if (!(I915_READ(DBUF_CTL_S1) & DBUF_POWER_STATE) || !(I915_READ(DBUF_CTL_S2) & DBUF_POWER_STATE)) DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n"); + else + dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices = 2; } static void icl_dbuf_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) @@ -2669,6 +2671,8 @@ static void icl_dbuf_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) if ((I915_READ(DBUF_CTL_S1) & DBUF_POWER_STATE) || (I915_READ(DBUF_CTL_S2) & DBUF_POWER_STATE)) DRM_ERROR("DBuf power disable timeout!\n"); + else + dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices = 0; } static void icl_mbus_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) -- 2.16.2 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/icl: Enable 2nd DBuf slice only when needed 2018-04-26 14:25 [PATCH 0/3] Optimize use of DBuf slices Mahesh Kumar 2018-04-26 14:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/icl: track dbuf slice-2 status Mahesh Kumar @ 2018-04-26 14:25 ` Mahesh Kumar 2018-11-05 16:00 ` Imre Deak 2018-04-26 14:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/icl: update ddb entry start/end mask during hw ddb readout Mahesh Kumar ` (4 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Mahesh Kumar @ 2018-04-26 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx; +Cc: paulo.r.zanoni, lucas.demarchi, rodrigo.vivi ICL has two slices of DBuf, each slice of size 1024 blocks. We should not always enable slice-2. It should be enabled only if display total required BW is > 12GBps OR more than 1 pipes are enabled. Changes since V1: - typecast total_data_rate to u64 before multiplication to solve any possible overflow (Rodrigo) - fix where skl_wm_get_hw_state was memsetting ddb, resulting enabled_slices to become zero - Fix the logic of calculating ddb_size Changes since V2: - If no-crtc is part of commit required_slices will have value "0", don't try to disable DBuf slice. Changes since V3: - Create a generic helper to enable/disable slice - don't return early if total_data_rate is 0, it may be cursor only commit, or atomic modeset without any plane. Changes since V4: - Solve checkpatch warnings - use kernel types u8/u64 instead of uint8_t/uint64_t Changes since V5: - Rebase Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 10 +++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 6 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 4 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index e5ad95d0af1b..a61909dc90ba 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -12256,6 +12256,8 @@ static void skl_update_crtcs(struct drm_atomic_state *state) bool progress; enum pipe pipe; int i; + u8 hw_enabled_slices = dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices; + u8 required_slices = intel_state->wm_results.ddb.enabled_slices; const struct skl_ddb_entry *entries[I915_MAX_PIPES] = {}; @@ -12264,6 +12266,10 @@ static void skl_update_crtcs(struct drm_atomic_state *state) if (new_crtc_state->active) entries[i] = &to_intel_crtc_state(old_crtc_state)->wm.skl.ddb; + /* If 2nd DBuf slice required, enable it here */ + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11 && required_slices > hw_enabled_slices) + icl_dbuf_slices_update(dev_priv, required_slices); + /* * Whenever the number of active pipes changes, we need to make sure we * update the pipes in the right order so that their ddb allocations @@ -12314,6 +12320,10 @@ static void skl_update_crtcs(struct drm_atomic_state *state) progress = true; } } while (progress); + + /* If 2nd DBuf slice is no more required disable it */ + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11 && required_slices < hw_enabled_slices) + icl_dbuf_slices_update(dev_priv, required_slices); } static void intel_atomic_helper_free_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h index 9bba0354ccd3..11a1932cde6e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h @@ -144,6 +144,10 @@ #define KHz(x) (1000 * (x)) #define MHz(x) KHz(1000 * (x)) +#define KBps(x) (1000 * (x)) +#define MBps(x) KBps(1000 * (x)) +#define GBps(x) ((u64)1000 * MBps((x))) + /* * Display related stuff */ @@ -1931,6 +1935,8 @@ bool intel_display_power_get_if_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum intel_display_power_domain domain); void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum intel_display_power_domain domain); +void icl_dbuf_slices_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, + u8 req_slices); static inline void assert_rpm_device_not_suspended(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index a29e6d512771..3e72e9eb736e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -3771,9 +3771,42 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_atomic_state *state) return true; } +static unsigned int intel_get_ddb_size(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, + const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate, + const unsigned int total_data_rate, + const int num_active, + struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb) +{ + const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode; + u64 total_data_bw; + u16 ddb_size = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->ddb_size; + + WARN_ON(ddb_size == 0); + + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11) + return ddb_size - 4; /* 4 blocks for bypass path allocation */ + + adjusted_mode = &cstate->base.adjusted_mode; + total_data_bw = (u64)total_data_rate * drm_mode_vrefresh(adjusted_mode); + + /* + * 12GB/s is maximum BW supported by single DBuf slice. + */ + if (total_data_bw >= GBps(12) || num_active > 1) { + ddb->enabled_slices = 2; + } else { + ddb->enabled_slices = 1; + ddb_size /= 2; + } + + return ddb_size; +} + static void skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_device *dev, const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate, + const unsigned int total_data_rate, + struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb, struct skl_ddb_entry *alloc, /* out */ int *num_active /* out */) { @@ -3796,11 +3829,8 @@ skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_device *dev, else *num_active = hweight32(dev_priv->active_crtcs); - ddb_size = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->ddb_size; - WARN_ON(ddb_size == 0); - - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11) - ddb_size -= 4; /* 4 blocks for bypass path allocation */ + ddb_size = intel_get_ddb_size(dev_priv, cstate, total_data_rate, + *num_active, ddb); /* * If the state doesn't change the active CRTC's, then there's @@ -4261,7 +4291,11 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate, return 0; } - skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(dev, cstate, alloc, &num_active); + total_data_rate = skl_get_total_relative_data_rate(cstate, + plane_data_rate, + uv_plane_data_rate); + skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(dev, cstate, total_data_rate, ddb, + alloc, &num_active); alloc_size = skl_ddb_entry_size(alloc); if (alloc_size == 0) return 0; @@ -4296,9 +4330,6 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate, * * FIXME: we may not allocate every single block here. */ - total_data_rate = skl_get_total_relative_data_rate(cstate, - plane_data_rate, - uv_plane_data_rate); if (total_data_rate == 0) return 0; @@ -5492,8 +5523,12 @@ void skl_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev) /* Fully recompute DDB on first atomic commit */ dev_priv->wm.distrust_bios_wm = true; } else { - /* Easy/common case; just sanitize DDB now if everything off */ - memset(ddb, 0, sizeof(*ddb)); + /* + * Easy/common case; just sanitize DDB now if everything off + * Keep dbuf slice info intact + */ + memset(ddb->plane, 0, sizeof(ddb->plane)); + memset(ddb->uv_plane, 0, sizeof(ddb->uv_plane)); } } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c index afc6ef81ca0c..3fffbfe4521d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c @@ -2619,32 +2619,69 @@ static void intel_power_domains_sync_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock); } -static void gen9_dbuf_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +static inline +bool intel_dbuf_slice_set(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, + i915_reg_t reg, bool enable) { - I915_WRITE(DBUF_CTL, I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) | DBUF_POWER_REQUEST); - POSTING_READ(DBUF_CTL); + u32 val, status; + val = I915_READ(reg); + val = enable ? (val | DBUF_POWER_REQUEST) : (val & ~DBUF_POWER_REQUEST); + I915_WRITE(reg, val); + POSTING_READ(reg); udelay(10); - if (!(I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) & DBUF_POWER_STATE)) - DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n"); + status = I915_READ(reg) & DBUF_POWER_STATE; + if ((enable && !status) || (!enable && status)) { + DRM_ERROR("DBus power %s timeout!\n", + enable ? "enable" : "disable"); + return false; + } + return true; +} + +static void gen9_dbuf_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +{ + intel_dbuf_slice_set(dev_priv, DBUF_CTL, true); } static void gen9_dbuf_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { - I915_WRITE(DBUF_CTL, I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) & ~DBUF_POWER_REQUEST); - POSTING_READ(DBUF_CTL); + intel_dbuf_slice_set(dev_priv, DBUF_CTL, false); +} - udelay(10); +static u8 intel_dbuf_max_slices(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +{ + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11) + return 1; + return 2; +} - if (I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) & DBUF_POWER_STATE) - DRM_ERROR("DBuf power disable timeout!\n"); +void icl_dbuf_slices_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, + u8 req_slices) +{ + u8 hw_enabled_slices = dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices; + u32 val; + bool ret; + + if (req_slices > intel_dbuf_max_slices(dev_priv)) { + DRM_ERROR("Invalid number of dbuf slices requested\n"); + return; + } + + if (req_slices == hw_enabled_slices || req_slices == 0) + return; + + val = I915_READ(DBUF_CTL_S2); + if (req_slices > hw_enabled_slices) + ret = intel_dbuf_slice_set(dev_priv, DBUF_CTL_S2, true); + else + ret = intel_dbuf_slice_set(dev_priv, DBUF_CTL_S2, false); + + if (ret) + dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices = req_slices; } -/* - * TODO: we shouldn't always enable DBUF_CTL_S2, we should only enable it when - * needed and keep it disabled as much as possible. - */ static void icl_dbuf_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { I915_WRITE(DBUF_CTL_S1, I915_READ(DBUF_CTL_S1) | DBUF_POWER_REQUEST); -- 2.16.2 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/icl: Enable 2nd DBuf slice only when needed 2018-04-26 14:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/icl: Enable 2nd DBuf slice only when needed Mahesh Kumar @ 2018-11-05 16:00 ` Imre Deak 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Imre Deak @ 2018-11-05 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mahesh Kumar; +Cc: intel-gfx, lucas.demarchi, paulo.r.zanoni, rodrigo.vivi On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 07:55:16PM +0530, Mahesh Kumar wrote: > ICL has two slices of DBuf, each slice of size 1024 blocks. > We should not always enable slice-2. It should be enabled only if > display total required BW is > 12GBps OR more than 1 pipes are enabled. > > Changes since V1: > - typecast total_data_rate to u64 before multiplication to solve any > possible overflow (Rodrigo) > - fix where skl_wm_get_hw_state was memsetting ddb, resulting > enabled_slices to become zero > - Fix the logic of calculating ddb_size > Changes since V2: > - If no-crtc is part of commit required_slices will have value "0", > don't try to disable DBuf slice. > Changes since V3: > - Create a generic helper to enable/disable slice > - don't return early if total_data_rate is 0, it may be cursor only > commit, or atomic modeset without any plane. > Changes since V4: > - Solve checkpatch warnings > - use kernel types u8/u64 instead of uint8_t/uint64_t > Changes since V5: > - Rebase > > Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Hi, could you take a look at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108654 ? Looks like we're calculating dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices or intel_state->wm_results.ddb.enabled_slices incorrectly when outputs are disabled, leading to an invalid HW access by a set_plane IOCTL while runtime suspended. > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 10 +++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 6 +++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 4 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index e5ad95d0af1b..a61909dc90ba 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -12256,6 +12256,8 @@ static void skl_update_crtcs(struct drm_atomic_state *state) > bool progress; > enum pipe pipe; > int i; > + u8 hw_enabled_slices = dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices; > + u8 required_slices = intel_state->wm_results.ddb.enabled_slices; > > const struct skl_ddb_entry *entries[I915_MAX_PIPES] = {}; > > @@ -12264,6 +12266,10 @@ static void skl_update_crtcs(struct drm_atomic_state *state) > if (new_crtc_state->active) > entries[i] = &to_intel_crtc_state(old_crtc_state)->wm.skl.ddb; > > + /* If 2nd DBuf slice required, enable it here */ > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11 && required_slices > hw_enabled_slices) > + icl_dbuf_slices_update(dev_priv, required_slices); > + > /* > * Whenever the number of active pipes changes, we need to make sure we > * update the pipes in the right order so that their ddb allocations > @@ -12314,6 +12320,10 @@ static void skl_update_crtcs(struct drm_atomic_state *state) > progress = true; > } > } while (progress); > + > + /* If 2nd DBuf slice is no more required disable it */ > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11 && required_slices < hw_enabled_slices) > + icl_dbuf_slices_update(dev_priv, required_slices); > } > > static void intel_atomic_helper_free_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > index 9bba0354ccd3..11a1932cde6e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > @@ -144,6 +144,10 @@ > #define KHz(x) (1000 * (x)) > #define MHz(x) KHz(1000 * (x)) > > +#define KBps(x) (1000 * (x)) > +#define MBps(x) KBps(1000 * (x)) > +#define GBps(x) ((u64)1000 * MBps((x))) > + > /* > * Display related stuff > */ > @@ -1931,6 +1935,8 @@ bool intel_display_power_get_if_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > enum intel_display_power_domain domain); > void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > enum intel_display_power_domain domain); > +void icl_dbuf_slices_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > + u8 req_slices); > > static inline void > assert_rpm_device_not_suspended(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > index a29e6d512771..3e72e9eb736e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > @@ -3771,9 +3771,42 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_atomic_state *state) > return true; > } > > +static unsigned int intel_get_ddb_size(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > + const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate, > + const unsigned int total_data_rate, > + const int num_active, > + struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb) > +{ > + const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode; > + u64 total_data_bw; > + u16 ddb_size = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->ddb_size; > + > + WARN_ON(ddb_size == 0); > + > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11) > + return ddb_size - 4; /* 4 blocks for bypass path allocation */ > + > + adjusted_mode = &cstate->base.adjusted_mode; > + total_data_bw = (u64)total_data_rate * drm_mode_vrefresh(adjusted_mode); > + > + /* > + * 12GB/s is maximum BW supported by single DBuf slice. > + */ > + if (total_data_bw >= GBps(12) || num_active > 1) { > + ddb->enabled_slices = 2; > + } else { > + ddb->enabled_slices = 1; > + ddb_size /= 2; > + } > + > + return ddb_size; > +} > + > static void > skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_device *dev, > const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate, > + const unsigned int total_data_rate, > + struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb, > struct skl_ddb_entry *alloc, /* out */ > int *num_active /* out */) > { > @@ -3796,11 +3829,8 @@ skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_device *dev, > else > *num_active = hweight32(dev_priv->active_crtcs); > > - ddb_size = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->ddb_size; > - WARN_ON(ddb_size == 0); > - > - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11) > - ddb_size -= 4; /* 4 blocks for bypass path allocation */ > + ddb_size = intel_get_ddb_size(dev_priv, cstate, total_data_rate, > + *num_active, ddb); > > /* > * If the state doesn't change the active CRTC's, then there's > @@ -4261,7 +4291,11 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate, > return 0; > } > > - skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(dev, cstate, alloc, &num_active); > + total_data_rate = skl_get_total_relative_data_rate(cstate, > + plane_data_rate, > + uv_plane_data_rate); > + skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(dev, cstate, total_data_rate, ddb, > + alloc, &num_active); > alloc_size = skl_ddb_entry_size(alloc); > if (alloc_size == 0) > return 0; > @@ -4296,9 +4330,6 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate, > * > * FIXME: we may not allocate every single block here. > */ > - total_data_rate = skl_get_total_relative_data_rate(cstate, > - plane_data_rate, > - uv_plane_data_rate); > if (total_data_rate == 0) > return 0; > > @@ -5492,8 +5523,12 @@ void skl_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev) > /* Fully recompute DDB on first atomic commit */ > dev_priv->wm.distrust_bios_wm = true; > } else { > - /* Easy/common case; just sanitize DDB now if everything off */ > - memset(ddb, 0, sizeof(*ddb)); > + /* > + * Easy/common case; just sanitize DDB now if everything off > + * Keep dbuf slice info intact > + */ > + memset(ddb->plane, 0, sizeof(ddb->plane)); > + memset(ddb->uv_plane, 0, sizeof(ddb->uv_plane)); > } > } > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > index afc6ef81ca0c..3fffbfe4521d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > @@ -2619,32 +2619,69 @@ static void intel_power_domains_sync_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock); > } > > -static void gen9_dbuf_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > +static inline > +bool intel_dbuf_slice_set(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > + i915_reg_t reg, bool enable) > { > - I915_WRITE(DBUF_CTL, I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) | DBUF_POWER_REQUEST); > - POSTING_READ(DBUF_CTL); > + u32 val, status; > > + val = I915_READ(reg); > + val = enable ? (val | DBUF_POWER_REQUEST) : (val & ~DBUF_POWER_REQUEST); > + I915_WRITE(reg, val); > + POSTING_READ(reg); > udelay(10); > > - if (!(I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) & DBUF_POWER_STATE)) > - DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n"); > + status = I915_READ(reg) & DBUF_POWER_STATE; > + if ((enable && !status) || (!enable && status)) { > + DRM_ERROR("DBus power %s timeout!\n", > + enable ? "enable" : "disable"); > + return false; > + } > + return true; > +} > + > +static void gen9_dbuf_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > +{ > + intel_dbuf_slice_set(dev_priv, DBUF_CTL, true); > } > > static void gen9_dbuf_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > { > - I915_WRITE(DBUF_CTL, I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) & ~DBUF_POWER_REQUEST); > - POSTING_READ(DBUF_CTL); > + intel_dbuf_slice_set(dev_priv, DBUF_CTL, false); > +} > > - udelay(10); > +static u8 intel_dbuf_max_slices(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > +{ > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11) > + return 1; > + return 2; > +} > > - if (I915_READ(DBUF_CTL) & DBUF_POWER_STATE) > - DRM_ERROR("DBuf power disable timeout!\n"); > +void icl_dbuf_slices_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > + u8 req_slices) > +{ > + u8 hw_enabled_slices = dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices; > + u32 val; > + bool ret; > + > + if (req_slices > intel_dbuf_max_slices(dev_priv)) { > + DRM_ERROR("Invalid number of dbuf slices requested\n"); > + return; > + } > + > + if (req_slices == hw_enabled_slices || req_slices == 0) > + return; > + > + val = I915_READ(DBUF_CTL_S2); > + if (req_slices > hw_enabled_slices) > + ret = intel_dbuf_slice_set(dev_priv, DBUF_CTL_S2, true); > + else > + ret = intel_dbuf_slice_set(dev_priv, DBUF_CTL_S2, false); > + > + if (ret) > + dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb.enabled_slices = req_slices; > } > > -/* > - * TODO: we shouldn't always enable DBUF_CTL_S2, we should only enable it when > - * needed and keep it disabled as much as possible. > - */ > static void icl_dbuf_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > { > I915_WRITE(DBUF_CTL_S1, I915_READ(DBUF_CTL_S1) | DBUF_POWER_REQUEST); > -- > 2.16.2 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/icl: update ddb entry start/end mask during hw ddb readout 2018-04-26 14:25 [PATCH 0/3] Optimize use of DBuf slices Mahesh Kumar 2018-04-26 14:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/icl: track dbuf slice-2 status Mahesh Kumar 2018-04-26 14:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/icl: Enable 2nd DBuf slice only when needed Mahesh Kumar @ 2018-04-26 14:25 ` Mahesh Kumar 2018-04-27 7:49 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Optimize use of DBuf slices (rev3) Patchwork ` (3 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Mahesh Kumar @ 2018-04-26 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx; +Cc: paulo.r.zanoni, lucas.demarchi, rodrigo.vivi Gen11/ICL onward ddb entry start/end mask is increased from 10 bits to 11 bits. This patch make changes to use proper mask for ICL+ during hardware ddb value readout. Changes since V1: - Use _MASK & _SHIFT macro (James) Changes since V2: - use kernel type u8 instead of uint8_t Changes since V3: - Rebase Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++------- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 2dad655a710c..b94fa933530e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -6481,6 +6481,9 @@ enum { #define _PLANE_BUF_CFG_1_B 0x7127c #define _PLANE_BUF_CFG_2_B 0x7137c +#define SKL_DDB_ENTRY_MASK 0x3FF +#define ICL_DDB_ENTRY_MASK 0x7FF +#define DDB_ENTRY_END_SHIFT 16 #define _PLANE_BUF_CFG_1(pipe) \ _PIPE(pipe, _PLANE_BUF_CFG_1_A, _PLANE_BUF_CFG_1_B) #define _PLANE_BUF_CFG_2(pipe) \ diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index 3e72e9eb736e..4126132eb707 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -3864,10 +3864,18 @@ static unsigned int skl_cursor_allocation(int num_active) return 8; } -static void skl_ddb_entry_init_from_hw(struct skl_ddb_entry *entry, u32 reg) +static void skl_ddb_entry_init_from_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, + struct skl_ddb_entry *entry, u32 reg) { - entry->start = reg & 0x3ff; - entry->end = (reg >> 16) & 0x3ff; + u16 mask; + + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) + mask = ICL_DDB_ENTRY_MASK; + else + mask = SKL_DDB_ENTRY_MASK; + entry->start = reg & mask; + entry->end = (reg >> DDB_ENTRY_END_SHIFT) & mask; + if (entry->end) entry->end += 1; } @@ -3884,7 +3892,8 @@ skl_ddb_get_hw_plane_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, /* Cursor doesn't support NV12/planar, so no extra calculation needed */ if (plane_id == PLANE_CURSOR) { val = I915_READ(CUR_BUF_CFG(pipe)); - skl_ddb_entry_init_from_hw(&ddb->plane[pipe][plane_id], val); + skl_ddb_entry_init_from_hw(dev_priv, + &ddb->plane[pipe][plane_id], val); return; } @@ -3903,10 +3912,13 @@ skl_ddb_get_hw_plane_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, val2 = I915_READ(PLANE_NV12_BUF_CFG(pipe, plane_id)); if (fourcc == DRM_FORMAT_NV12) { - skl_ddb_entry_init_from_hw(&ddb->plane[pipe][plane_id], val2); - skl_ddb_entry_init_from_hw(&ddb->uv_plane[pipe][plane_id], val); + skl_ddb_entry_init_from_hw(dev_priv, + &ddb->plane[pipe][plane_id], val2); + skl_ddb_entry_init_from_hw(dev_priv, + &ddb->uv_plane[pipe][plane_id], val); } else { - skl_ddb_entry_init_from_hw(&ddb->plane[pipe][plane_id], val); + skl_ddb_entry_init_from_hw(dev_priv, + &ddb->plane[pipe][plane_id], val); } } -- 2.16.2 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Optimize use of DBuf slices (rev3) 2018-04-26 14:25 [PATCH 0/3] Optimize use of DBuf slices Mahesh Kumar ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2018-04-26 14:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/icl: update ddb entry start/end mask during hw ddb readout Mahesh Kumar @ 2018-04-27 7:49 ` Patchwork 2018-04-27 8:03 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork ` (2 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2018-04-27 7:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mahesh Kumar; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: Optimize use of DBuf slices (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/41180/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim sparse origin/drm-tip Commit: drm/i915/icl: track dbuf slice-2 status -drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/../i915_drv.h:2211:33: warning: constant 0xffffea0000000000 is so big it is unsigned long -drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/../i915_drv.h:3659:16: warning: expression using sizeof(void) +drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/../i915_drv.h:2212:33: warning: constant 0xffffea0000000000 is so big it is unsigned long +drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/../i915_drv.h:3660:16: warning: expression using sizeof(void) Commit: drm/i915/icl: Enable 2nd DBuf slice only when needed Okay! Commit: drm/i915/icl: update ddb entry start/end mask during hw ddb readout Okay! _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Optimize use of DBuf slices (rev3) 2018-04-26 14:25 [PATCH 0/3] Optimize use of DBuf slices Mahesh Kumar ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2018-04-27 7:49 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Optimize use of DBuf slices (rev3) Patchwork @ 2018-04-27 8:03 ` Patchwork 2018-04-27 9:50 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork 2018-04-28 0:15 ` [PATCH 0/3] Optimize use of DBuf slices Rodrigo Vivi 6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2018-04-27 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mahesh Kumar; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: Optimize use of DBuf slices (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/41180/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4106 -> Patchwork_8815 = == Summary - SUCCESS == No regressions found. External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/41180/revisions/3/mbox/ == Known issues == Here are the changes found in Patchwork_8815 that come from known issues: === IGT changes === ==== Issues hit ==== igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank: fi-cfl-s3: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#100368) ==== Possible fixes ==== igt@prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip: fi-ilk-650: FAIL (fdo#104008) -> PASS fdo#100368 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368 fdo#104008 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104008 == Participating hosts (39 -> 35) == Missing (4): fi-byt-j1900 fi-ctg-p8600 fi-ilk-m540 fi-skl-6700hq == Build changes == * Linux: CI_DRM_4106 -> Patchwork_8815 CI_DRM_4106: dd4a65248ce636039848b97f0b8e4704aa2f32b2 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGT_4450: 0350f0e7f6a0e07281445fc3082aa70419f4aac7 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools Patchwork_8815: 5c516df104b953f7868147d104cdfa4b4596dacd @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux piglit_4450: b57600ba58ae0cdbad86826fd653aa0191212f27 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit == Linux commits == 5c516df104b9 drm/i915/icl: update ddb entry start/end mask during hw ddb readout 4d96ef7a65c8 drm/i915/icl: Enable 2nd DBuf slice only when needed 2e0eb86b46f1 drm/i915/icl: track dbuf slice-2 status == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_8815/issues.html _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for Optimize use of DBuf slices (rev3) 2018-04-26 14:25 [PATCH 0/3] Optimize use of DBuf slices Mahesh Kumar ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2018-04-27 8:03 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork @ 2018-04-27 9:50 ` Patchwork 2018-04-28 0:15 ` [PATCH 0/3] Optimize use of DBuf slices Rodrigo Vivi 6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2018-04-27 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mahesh Kumar; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: Optimize use of DBuf slices (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/41180/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4106_full -> Patchwork_8815_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes coming with Patchwork_8815_full need to be verified manually. If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes introduced in Patchwork_8815_full, please notify your bug team to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/41180/revisions/3/mbox/ == Possible new issues == Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_8815_full: === IGT changes === ==== Warnings ==== igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-rc6-vebox: shard-kbl: SKIP -> PASS +1 igt@kms_fbcon_fbt@fbc-suspend: shard-snb: PASS -> SKIP == Known issues == Here are the changes found in Patchwork_8815_full that come from known issues: === IGT changes === ==== Issues hit ==== igt@gem_render_copy_redux@normal: shard-kbl: PASS -> INCOMPLETE (fdo#103665) igt@kms_atomic_transition@1x-modeset-transitions-nonblocking-fencing: shard-apl: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#103207) igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursor-vs-flip-toggle: shard-hsw: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#103355) igt@kms_flip@absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible: shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#106087) igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible: shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#100368) ==== Possible fixes ==== igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-1us: shard-glk: FAIL (fdo#105957) -> PASS igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctxn: shard-kbl: INCOMPLETE (fdo#106023, fdo#103665) -> PASS igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-ts-check-interruptible: shard-glk: FAIL (fdo#100368) -> PASS igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-rgb565-draw-pwrite: shard-glk: DMESG-WARN -> PASS igt@kms_rotation_crc@primary-rotation-180: shard-hsw: FAIL (fdo#103925) -> PASS igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-accuracy-idle: shard-hsw: FAIL (fdo#102583) -> PASS fdo#100368 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368 fdo#102583 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102583 fdo#103207 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103207 fdo#103355 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103355 fdo#103665 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103665 fdo#103925 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103925 fdo#105957 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105957 fdo#106023 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106023 fdo#106087 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106087 == Participating hosts (6 -> 5) == Missing (1): shard-glkb == Build changes == * Linux: CI_DRM_4106 -> Patchwork_8815 CI_DRM_4106: dd4a65248ce636039848b97f0b8e4704aa2f32b2 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGT_4450: 0350f0e7f6a0e07281445fc3082aa70419f4aac7 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools Patchwork_8815: 5c516df104b953f7868147d104cdfa4b4596dacd @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux piglit_4450: b57600ba58ae0cdbad86826fd653aa0191212f27 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_8815/shards.html _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] Optimize use of DBuf slices 2018-04-26 14:25 [PATCH 0/3] Optimize use of DBuf slices Mahesh Kumar ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2018-04-27 9:50 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork @ 2018-04-28 0:15 ` Rodrigo Vivi 6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Rodrigo Vivi @ 2018-04-28 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mahesh Kumar; +Cc: intel-gfx, lucas.demarchi, paulo.r.zanoni On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 07:55:14PM +0530, Mahesh Kumar wrote: > Patches in this series were originally part of series: > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36993/ > > Reposting it here after rebase > use kernel types u8/u16 etc instead of uint8_t > > Changes: > - Rebase the series pushed to dinq, thanks. > > Mahesh Kumar (3): > drm/i915/icl: track dbuf slice-2 status > drm/i915/icl: Enable 2nd DBuf slice only when needed > drm/i915/icl: update ddb entry start/end mask during hw ddb readout > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 15 +++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 6 ++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++----- > 6 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.16.2 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3] Optimize use of DBuf slices @ 2018-04-05 9:17 Mahesh Kumar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Mahesh Kumar @ 2018-04-05 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx; +Cc: paulo.r.zanoni, lucas.demarchi, rodrigo.vivi Patches in this series were originally part of series: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36993/ Reposting it here after rebase use kernel types u8/u16 etc instead of uint8_t Mahesh Kumar (3): drm/i915/icl: track dbuf slice-2 status drm/i915/icl: Enable 2nd DBuf slice only when needed drm/i915/icl: update ddb entry start/end mask during hw ddb readout drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 15 ++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 6 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++----- 6 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) -- 2.16.2 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3] Optimize use of DBuf slices @ 2018-04-05 6:00 Mahesh Kumar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Mahesh Kumar @ 2018-04-05 6:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx; +Cc: lucas.demarchi, paulo.r.zanoni, rodrigo.vivi Patches in this series were originally part of series: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36993/ Reposting it here after rebase Mahesh Kumar (3): drm/i915/icl: track dbuf slice-2 status drm/i915/icl: Enable 2nd DBuf slice only when needed drm/i915/icl: update ddb entry start/end mask during hw ddb readout drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 15 ++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 6 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++----- 6 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) -- 2.16.2 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-05 16:00 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-04-26 14:25 [PATCH 0/3] Optimize use of DBuf slices Mahesh Kumar 2018-04-26 14:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/icl: track dbuf slice-2 status Mahesh Kumar 2018-04-26 14:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/icl: Enable 2nd DBuf slice only when needed Mahesh Kumar 2018-11-05 16:00 ` Imre Deak 2018-04-26 14:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/icl: update ddb entry start/end mask during hw ddb readout Mahesh Kumar 2018-04-27 7:49 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Optimize use of DBuf slices (rev3) Patchwork 2018-04-27 8:03 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2018-04-27 9:50 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork 2018-04-28 0:15 ` [PATCH 0/3] Optimize use of DBuf slices Rodrigo Vivi -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2018-04-05 9:17 Mahesh Kumar 2018-04-05 6:00 Mahesh Kumar
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.