All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Satendra Singh Thakur <satendra.t@samsung.com>,
	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Hemanshu Srivastava <hemanshu.s@samsung.com>,
	Madhur Verma <madhur.verma@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/atomic: Handling the case when setting old crtc for plane
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 13:55:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180503105503.GQ23723@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180503092458.GH12521@phenom.ffwll.local>

On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 11:24:59AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 11:19:32AM +0530, Satendra Singh Thakur wrote:
> > In the func drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_plane, with the current code,
> > if crtc of the plane_state and crtc passed as argument to the func
> > are same, entire func will executed in vein.
> > It will get state of crtc and clear and set the bits in plane_mask.
> > All these steps are not required for same old crtc.
> > Ideally, we should do nothing in this case, this patch handles the same,
> > and causes the program to return without doing anything in such scenario.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Satendra Singh Thakur <satendra.t@samsung.com>
> > Cc: Madhur Verma <madhur.verma@samsung.com>
> > Cc: Hemanshu Srivastava <hemanshu.s@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > index 7d25c42..5bd3365 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > @@ -1421,7 +1421,9 @@ drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_plane(struct drm_plane_state *plane_state,
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_plane *plane = plane_state->plane;
> >  	struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> > -
> > +	/* Nothing to do for same crtc*/
> > +	if (plane_state->crtc == crtc)
> > +		return 0;
> 
> I didn't do this (both here and in the set_crtc_for_connector functions)
> because the overhead is probably way down in the noise compared to the
> overall atomic commit machinery. Do you really see this as a hotpath?

drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_connector() actually has this since commit
e2d800a3ce1b ("drm: Avoid connector reference imbalance on error path")

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Satendra Singh Thakur <satendra.t@samsung.com>,
	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Hemanshu Srivastava <hemanshu.s@samsung.com>,
	Madhur Verma <madhur.verma@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/atomic: Handling the case when setting old crtc for plane
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 13:55:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180503105503.GQ23723@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180503092458.GH12521@phenom.ffwll.local>

On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 11:24:59AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 11:19:32AM +0530, Satendra Singh Thakur wrote:
> > In the func drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_plane, with the current code,
> > if crtc of the plane_state and crtc passed as argument to the func
> > are same, entire func will executed in vein.
> > It will get state of crtc and clear and set the bits in plane_mask.
> > All these steps are not required for same old crtc.
> > Ideally, we should do nothing in this case, this patch handles the same,
> > and causes the program to return without doing anything in such scenario.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Satendra Singh Thakur <satendra.t@samsung.com>
> > Cc: Madhur Verma <madhur.verma@samsung.com>
> > Cc: Hemanshu Srivastava <hemanshu.s@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > index 7d25c42..5bd3365 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > @@ -1421,7 +1421,9 @@ drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_plane(struct drm_plane_state *plane_state,
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_plane *plane = plane_state->plane;
> >  	struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> > -
> > +	/* Nothing to do for same crtc*/
> > +	if (plane_state->crtc == crtc)
> > +		return 0;
> 
> I didn't do this (both here and in the set_crtc_for_connector functions)
> because the overhead is probably way down in the noise compared to the
> overall atomic commit machinery. Do you really see this as a hotpath?

drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_connector() actually has this since commit
e2d800a3ce1b ("drm: Avoid connector reference imbalance on error path")

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-03 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20180503055008epcas5p2e98aff943c031a90a14df1a85e359d6c@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2018-05-03  5:49 ` [PATCH] drm/atomic: Handling the case when setting old crtc for plane Satendra Singh Thakur
2018-05-03  9:24   ` Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03  9:24     ` Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 10:55     ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2018-05-03 10:55       ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-05-03 13:33       ` Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 13:33         ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180503105503.GQ23723@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
    --cc=hemanshu.s@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=madhur.verma@samsung.com \
    --cc=satendra.t@samsung.com \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.