Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] Revert "ssb: Prevent build of PCI host features in module"

["Michael Büsch" <m@bues.ch>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1478 bytes --]

On Sat, 12 May 2018 10:50:42 +0300
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:

> Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> writes:
> 
> > On 05/11/2018 05:13 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:  
> >> Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> writes:
> >>  
> >>> On 11 May 2018 at 11:17, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:  
>  [...]  
> >>>
> >>> As these patches fix regression/build error, I believe both should get
> >>> into 4.17.  
> >>
> >> How much confidence do we have that we don't need to end up reverting
> >> patch 2 as well? I rather be pushing patch 2 to 4.18 so that there's
> >> more time for testing and waiting for feedback.  
> >
> > Although I do not have the hardware to test the builds, I worked
> > closely with the OP in the bug at b.r.c noted above. From that effort,
> > it became clear what configuration variables were missing to cause the
> > x86 failures. Patch 2 satisfies the requirement, and prevents the
> > build problems found by the MIPS users. Both patches are needed in
> > 4.17.  
> 
> And I assume Michael is ok with this approach as well as I haven't heard
> from him. I'll then push both of these to 4.17.
> 

Yes, I'm OK with the patch, if we have a third patch that cleans up the
PCI_DRIVERS_LEGACY dependency by moving it to SSB_PCICORE_HOSTMODE
where it belongs. (This doesn't need to go into the stable tree.)
We currently implicitly get that via dependency chain, so this is OK
for now as-is.

-- 
Michael

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]